Best thing is to stay silent ... We should say that Muslims should be buried on one hand, but if there was no human to bury then what? I would sooner like to believe that OBL was killed and his body thrown in the sea than think it was all a hoax and the throwing in the sea was just a matter of convenience - for those who say OBL was killed. Convenience because there is no way evidence for authentication can swing against them.
On the other hand what was not anticipated was the reaction of the Muslims who would stand up and say ... Muslims need to be buried ... deep down in their minds they want to know the truth as well. I just feel powerless to tell the molvis "forget it" - however they probably do not see eye to eye with me anyway. I say it matters not if he is revered in this life or not ... we know nothing about the truth of this man ... for all we know he may have been peace loving and killed early after 9/11 and then there after his 'name' was used to propagate long war on the other hand he could well have been that evil person portrayed in the West, and on the other hand again he could still be alive ...
If someone used to die on a Islamic ship in olden days they used to toss the dead body in the sea. So I have read. All those burials were non-Islamic ?
no country wanted him buried on their land so they dumped him in the sea and why is it important that the muslim scholars should have said something about OBL not showing any care for the muslims that died and that didn't get proper burial rites, i wish he had cared for both the nonmuslims and muslims that died in 9/11. with that statement it makes me feel like the life of a muslim is of more value than a nonmuslim's life.
It's high time we accept that bin Ladin and 9/11 go hand in hand. And even the in rare rare possibility that they don't, the truth still remains that there is a bigger group of Muslim fanatics than that of any other religion. And they hate the west.
It's high time we accept that bin Ladin and 9/11 go hand in hand. And even the in rare rare possibility that they don't, the truth still remains that there is a bigger group of Muslim fanatics than that of any other religion. And they hate the west.
I don't want to judge anyone here and give my opinions but I just don't understand one thing what was the hurry of dumping him in the sea ? They could have kept his body like they did with sadam . I mean he was killed and his country was given a chance for burial they disagreed so they dumped him in the sea and this all happened in less than 24 hours wow !
I dunno it all sounds fishy to me. One would think that the man who had been the most wanted person for the past decade and after whose killing obama said, ‘today justice was served’, his body would be paraded over all channels for all to see again and again, rather than burying him in the sea within 24 hours
Osama Bin laden was already old when 9/11 happened. I think he died in around 2004 or 05 in Afghanistan somewhere in a mountain. They probably buried him somewhere in a cave. The lack of images shown by the media suggests that America is using another incentive to invade Pakistan on the basis of increased terrorist activity after OBL's death.
Osama Bin laden was already old when 9/11 happened. I think he died in around 2004 or 05 in Afghanistan somewhere in a mountain. They probably buried him somewhere in a cave. The lack of images shown by the media suggests that American is using another incentive to invade Pakistan on the basis of increased terrorist activity after OBL's death.
You saved me posting, that's what I believe aswell. I wonder how long it is before Pakistan gets invaded.
Yes there are milliions plus consipracy theories but as Occam razor's states the hypothesis with least assumption has the highest chances of being the truth.
Occam's razor doesn't really state that though. It says we should lean towards a theory with the least assumptions and then start replacing the easy assumptions with others until we reach the most plausible state. So no, the hypothesis with the least assumption is almost never the one with the highest chances of being the truth. Sorry for being anal about it.
And even the in rare rare possibility that they don't, the truth still remains that there is a bigger group of Muslim fanatics than that of any other religion. And they hate the west.
Eh while that stands true, there's millions of Xenophones who hate Islam and are fanatical enough to work against it and undermine the religion.
Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor[1]), often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae, translating to law of parsimony, law of economy or law of succinctness, is a principle that generally recommends selecting the competing hypothesis that makes the fewest new assumptions, when the hypotheses are equal in other respects.[2] For instance, they must both sufficiently explain available data in the first place.
What you said and what the Wiki article says might look like the same thing but its more about eliminating all obvious possibilities. Basically you select the simplest hypothesis and then pick at its simplicities until you reach a point where you are satisfied with it. It is not just about saying 'The simplest hypothesis is the most accurate one'. I hope I've been coherent in my explanation. :o
