Re: Sins
I’m not arguing with you. I just stated the reality that was presented in the article, which was that birth rates was the reason for the increase and not actual conversions.
Re: Sins
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..p.
O
S
T
.
D
E
L
E
E
D.
.
.
Re: Sins
Comparing US with Saudi Arabi not significant. Then comparing US with other irreligious countries doesn’t make sense to you. What makes sense to you is what you like and get from fake links 
Re: Sins
So if scientists will be able to create those “artificial objects” they will also be able to make them immortal. That those artificially created objects will not have point of death. So you do not understand the subject and I suggest you dont stuff your mind with things it cannot handle
expecting a typical arrogant and ignorant reply.
Re: Sins
Dummy, I stated my reasons for not doing country by country comparisons. You just decided to gloss over that and give this “herp derp” response. Ironically, you claim that I only look at things that I “like” but call the information I give to you as “fake links” and do not even bother reading it. You are a joke.
Re: Sins
Expecting an arrogant and ignorant reply is what I expect from you. You are the one who has nothing but nonsense typed up and wants to call it a response 
You are the one who demonstrates you do not really know anything about subjects and are treating me like I am a simple minded individual. You are projecting dude.
Here is the beautiful thing about science. If something that deviates from the norm is created or discovered, science can make exceptions and work around it to add it in to the body of knowledge so it will overall make sense. Science, ideally, allows for improvement on the knowledge that is already known. Do you know that viruses are not considered to be living things because they do not meet the requirements to be a living thing? Those hypothetical “artificial objects” that are immortal (lol) do not violate any of the requirements of being a living being, then they will be considered a living being because they are currently alive and meet the requirements. It is not a hard concept to fathom. You really look pathetic trying to put me in some sort of trap when the reality is, unlike you, I do not treat science like how people treat their religion. If something gets discovered/created that contradicts earlier knowledge then there should be an effort made to understand where it is coming from and how it works instead of discrediting it, calling it sin, banning it..etc.
Re: Sins
Idiot, you said death is a characteristic of living being then you say, an artificial object that will have no point of death will also be a living being. In no way, life can be created because it has a point of death, you need digest it first. or get your bakwas back that you said only two categories are enough 
I think my last reply was a shut up call but you are too jahil to cope up with your ignorance.
Re: Sins
yes, only fake links are your resort
as you already said you like critique of religion and has no purpose just out of random thinking, you came here wandering
Re: Sins
Nothing is a shut up call for you. All you do is post nonsense. There is that arrogance you can’t back up again!
Also, you illiterate, did you skip that entire last paragraph I typed up? The situation you came up isn’t even real and I already stated that if something that contradicts the current body of knowledge that exists for what is considered a living being is discovered/created then the knowledge will be modified. That is the point of science stupid.
Re: Sins
Keep calling stuff you do not like “fake links.” That is the only claim someone as stupid as you can cough up.
Also, look at your selective reading. The post literally above the one you quoted me from said this:
So, no, my attitude towards religion doesn’t just come out of nowhere. You are a prime example of how religion can be utilized to make people lack critical thinking skills.
Re: Sins
We have seen the results of the lack of critical thinking skills recently in Islamabad and Rawalpindi - Pakistan can never progress and is now being termed as the most dangerous country in the world.
Re: Sins
Tbh, even if Pakistan wasn’t the worst of the worst, I seriously for the life of me cannot see why people do not want to confront this issue. People are really trying to sidestep the issues caused by how overall Pakistani society uses their religion. I am not naive enough to think that religion is the only reason why Pakistan and even the Muslim world in general are in their current condition, but lets not act like people’s ignorance and bigotries that are religious based weren’t exploited to create the societies they have now.
Re: Sins
Have you ever stayed in Pakistan?
Re: Sins
best example of self praising. your disbeliever, and it automatically implies you are critical thinker, oh that is a thinker!
IF my replies are not making sense are illogical, why are you even bothering to reply? restlessness, right
Who asked you to take care of community? and why are you doing so?
Religious also claim to take care of community. they believe disbelief is making this world hell of greed and curse.
Re: Sins
Even if it is not real, if there is a possibility of third category you should still take that bakwas back that only two categories are sufficient, got it? I am purposly calling your claim bakwas because that was not only arrogant but also full of personal attacks.
or you believe there is no possibility?
well that was to bring you to senses. Now the point is death is also characteristic of living being. I am sure you are an idiot and hypocrite because despite my point will bother you as hell to reply me, you will still say it doesn’t make sense to you. we shall see it
The existence of soul in living bieng can implied by a test. We know any artificiality created object if stops functioning can be made functioning again while living being once stop functioning cannot be brought back to functioning state even if there is no deterioration of the parts of the living object. that is why I said ‘you restless soul’
Re: Sins
Yeah I have. Even if it is not the literal worst place ever there is no point in pretending there aren’t glaring issues present.
Re: Sins
How many seats do these mullahs involved in Rwp/Isb sit-ins get?
Ho many votes did they get in 2013 election?
How many did they get in 2008 election?
Answer these ‘precisely’ and we’ll talk
Re: Sins
I did not even praise my own intellect in that reply, so LMAO at you. I don’t believe that being a disbeliever by itself will make you a better critical thinker, so there is you making up positions for me again.
Sis, I reply to you for my own amusement and because you reply back. If I have such bakwas explanations and I am a jahil, why do *you *reply back? Why do you keep entertaining my so called “restless soul”?
And of course I’m going to care about the issues in my community. It is my community and I care about the overall community progressing instead of attaching to ideals that should not be replicated in the 21st century. Also, many religious folk don’t need disbelief to be greedy and you do not need religion to have a moral compass.
Re: Sins
Buddy, you called my explanation bakwas cause your feelings got hurt
The idea of a “soul” is a philosophical and religious one so it doesn’t belong in the context of this specific discussion.
It seems like you do not read or understand anything, so you seem to be a the real blubbering idiot. So I am going to copy and paste again:
“i*f something that contradicts the current body of knowledge that exists for what is considered a living being is discovered/created then the knowledge will be modified. That is the point of science stupid”
Re: Sins
And who is pretending there aren’t glaring issues present? Everyone living in Pakistan or abroad knows Pakistan has a lot of problems. How exactly are you tackling these issues? By berating the country, its people, and their religion on a forum? Lol how very considerate of you. Lagi raho.