Sins

[Mostar95]

Re: Sins

Pakistan’s problem could be solved very easily - check population growth, end animosity with India, reduce defence budget, increase education & health spending, keep religion personal matter and control extremism. But the religious beliefs of majority of Pakistan people are the major obstacle in achieving these goals.

[IsaidwhatIsaid]

Re: Sins

@aqua70

And who is pretending there aren’t glaring issues present? Everyone living in Pakistan or abroad knows Pakistan has a lot of problems. How exactly are you tackling these issues? By berating the country, its people, and their religion on a forum? Lol how very considerate of you. Lagi raho.

How is pointing out the very real problem that is how religion has been utilized in that society “herp derp berating its people and their religion!!!111 herp derp”? If it hurts your feelings then sorry boo boo, I don’t care.

[aqua70]

Re: Sins

@IsaidwhatIsaid

How is pointing out the very real problem that is how religion has been utilized in that society “herp derp berating its people and their religion!!!111 herp derp”? If it hurts your feelings then sorry boo boo, I don’t care.

You must live a very sad and miserable life since civility has missed you by 100 miles. Like I said lagi raho.

[IsaidwhatIsaid]

Re: Sins

@aqua70

You must live a very sad and miserable life since civility has missed you by 100 miles. Like I said lagi raho.

My life is pretty great cause I like to face reality instead of having everything sugarcoated, so I get to the root of my problems and get them solved. Also, I give civility to those who deserve it =)

[aqua70]

Re: Sins

@IsaidwhatIsaid

My life is pretty great cause I like to face reality instead of having everything sugarcoated, so I get to the root of my problems and get them solved. Also, I give civility to those who deserve it =)

And here I was, wasting my civility on you when you gave me every reason not to. Thanks for bringing it to my attention “boo boo”. I shall take your advice and not engage in any further discussion with such a prized and special individual.

[IsaidwhatIsaid]

Re: Sins

@aqua70

And here I was, wasting my civility on you when you gave me every reason not to. Thanks for bringing it to my attention “boo boo”. I shall take your advice and not engage in any further discussion with such a prized and special individual.

Good for you sis! Buenos noches.

[Mostar95]

Re: Sins

The mullahs have not got many seats and votes in all the general elections in Pakistan but they have the capability of changing and affecting political decisions in Pakistan which is evident from the events which took place in 1977.

[ajazali]

Re: Sins

@IsaidwhatIsaid

Buddy, you called my explanation bakwas cause your feelings got hurt

yes, this is the best a looser can do. you know slander is tool of a looser

The idea of a “soul” is a philosophical and religious one so it doesn’t belong in the context of this specific discussion.

It seems like you do not read or understand anything, so you seem to be a the real blubbering idiot. So I am going to copy and paste again:

“i*f something that contradicts the current body of knowledge that exists for what is considered a living being is discovered/created then the knowledge will be modified. That is the point of science stupid”

Infact philosophy or logical reasoning is the first thing to do that help investigating a subject, especially when science has not done any advance regarding the subject.
so you are a restless soul

[ajazali]

Re: Sins

@IsaidwhatIsaid

I did not even praise my own intellect in that reply, so LMAO at you. I don’t believe that being a disbeliever by itself will make you a better critical thinker, so there is you making up positions for me again.

idiot, what does it mean when you are taunting someone as if he/she is lacking critical thinking?

Sis, I reply to you for my own amusement and because you reply back. If I have such bakwas explanations and I am a jahil, why do *you *reply back? Why do you keep entertaining my so called “restless soul”?

this amusement making you resort to loose patience or it is how your parents grew you up?

And of course I’m going to care about the issues in my community. It is my community and I care about the overall community progressing instead of attaching to ideals that should not be replicated in the 21st century. Also, many religious folk don’t need disbelief to be greedy and you do not need religion to have a moral compass.

LOL at my community.
religious people can have same argument.

[IsaidwhatIsaid]

Re: Sins

@ajazali

yes, this is the best a looser can do. you know slander is tool of a looser

Infact philosophy or logical reasoning is the first thing to do that help investigating a subject, especially when science has not done any advance regarding the subject.
so you are a restless soul

If slander is a tool of a loser you are in the same boat as me, buddy. Also, I use “”“slander”“” as the cherry on top. I do not simply call you an idiot, I answer your questions as well.

No, philosophy is not the “first thing” used to help investigate a subject. The “first thing” is an observation.

Philosophy itself comes out of observations and experiences as as well. There has to something grounded to explain before there can be a scientific, religious, or philosophical explanation. Sis, you aren’t good at this.

[IsaidwhatIsaid]

Re: Sins

@ajazali

idiot, what does it mean when you are taunting someone as if he/she is lacking critical thinking?

this amusement making you resort to loose patience or it is how your parents grew you up?

LOL at my community.
religious people can have same argument.

Me telling you that you lack critical thinking skills is not saying I am a genius. It is simply me telling you that you lack critical thinking skills. My critical thinking skills do not even have to be good for me to say since I am telling you that you have none.

Me insulting you and you getting triggered is my amusement. Also, you still didn’t answer my question.

Keep “LOLing.” I am of Pakistani heritage and I don’t like the current state of Pakistani people regarding their relationship with their religion, so it is my community and I have a right to call y’all out.

[ajazali]

Re: Sins

@IsaidwhatIsaid

If slander is a tool of a loser you are in the same boat as me, buddy. Also, I use “”“slander”“” as the cherry on top. I do not simply call you an idiot, I answer your questions as well.

No, philosophy is not the “first thing” used to help investigate a subject. The “first thing” is an observation.

Philosophy itself comes out of observations and experiences as as well. There has to something grounded to explain before there can be a scientific, religious, or philosophical explanation. Sis, you aren’t good at this.

Idiot, comparing two objects state and characteristics is an observation. results can be argue and analyzed.
I am not good at this, my every reply bother you to reply. In fact you were the first to quote my post, you restless soul

[ajazali]

Re: Sins

@IsaidwhatIsaid

Me telling you that you lack critical thinking skills is not saying I am a genius. It is simply me telling you that you lack critical thinking skills. My critical thinking skills do not even have to be good for me to say since I am telling you that you have none.
..

lol, you mean, you dont have to be in good mental state to judge others

[IsaidwhatIsaid]

Re: Sins

@ajazali

Idiot, comparing two objects state and characteristics is an observation. results can be argue and analyzed.
I am not good at this, my every reply bother you to reply. In fact you were the first to quote my post, you restless soul

Comparing objective realities about things is an observation, but you didn’t do that dummy! You brought up a hypothetical situation and tried to make a case with it and starting bringing up “herp herp philosophy and logical reasoning” to make yourself look smart. You failed.
Someone replying to stupidity does not mean the person making the initial claim is good at arguing. I reply to your replies to my posts for amusement and cause I do not back down from arguments. You have yet to answer me why you keep replying to my posts even though I am a “jahil” and “restless soul.”

[IsaidwhatIsaid]

Re: Sins

@ajazali

lol, you mean, you dont have to be in good mental state to judge others

Of course anybody regardless of their mental capabilities is able to judge and make conclusions. It is why you keep thinking I am a lost and confused soul and were the one seriously presenting a case about largely non religious countries having higher suicide rates cause their populations don’t strongly adhere to the Abrahamic sky daddy

[ajazali]

Re: Sins

@IsaidwhatIsaid

Of course anybody regardless of their mental capabilities is able to judge and make conclusions. It is why you keep thinking I am a lost and confused soul and were the one seriously presenting a case about largely non religious countries having higher suicide rates cause their populations don’t strongly adhere to the Abrahamic sky daddy

You can judge others thinking capabilities when you know your own thinking skills are not good enough
It shows how great critical thinker you are
Idiot i replied to a post where moster was suggesting believers that reject the believe to be happy. You restless soul

[ajazali]

Re: Sins

@IsaidwhatIsaid

Comparing objective realities about things is an observation, but you didn’t do that dummy! You brought up a hypothetical situation and tried to make a case with it and starting bringing up “herp herp philosophy and logical reasoning” to make yourself look smart. You failed.
Someone replying to stupidity does not mean the person making the initial claim is good at arguing. I reply to your replies to my posts for amusement and cause I do not back down from arguments. You have yet to answer me why you keep replying to my posts even though I am a “jahil” and “restless soul.”

Replying because we have purpose from our belief. Replying to expose you jahalat more and make your soul more restless
Neither your body nor is the energy your body possess are real. Just because you cannot quantify as where that energy goes after death you can say therw is nothing objective to discuss or argue.
Lol at objective reality. You idiot doesn’t know that its atheists belief that everything is subjective.

[IsaidwhatIsaid]

Re: Sins

@ajazali

You can judge others thinking capabilities when you know your own thinking skills are not good enough
It shows how great critical thinker you are
Idiot i replied to a post where moster was suggesting believers that reject the believe to be happy. You restless soul

I didn’t make an actual judgement of my critical thinking skills considering it was presented in a hypothetical way. I see your reading skills are failing you again. Also, anybody can make a judgement on anything regardless of their own skill level. It doesn’t have to mean that the judgement has weight, it just means they can make it. I cannot sing well, but I still have the capability to say that others cannot sing well either. LMFAO. Also, your reply to MoStar was quite pathetic regardless of your intent. Instead of trying to debunk his claims you presented your presented your own joke of an argument.

[IsaidwhatIsaid]

Re: Sins

@ajazali

Replying because we have purpose from our belief. Replying to expose you jahalat more and make your soul more restless
Neither your body nor is the energy your body possess are real. Just because you cannot quantify as where that energy goes after death you can say therw is nothing objective to discuss or argue.
Lol at objective reality. You idiot doesn’t know that its atheists belief that everything is subjective.

Aww, you really think your pathetic arguments are making some kind of dent in my belief system or making my soul more restless. Your “purpose from your belief” is also a pretty lame reason. LMFAO. As if not adhering to a religion made in the 7th century means that you can’t have a moral code or a purpose in life.

Also, let’s look at this hot take: “Neither your body nor is the energy your body possess are real?” What kind of dumbass assertion is that?

There has to be tangible proof of something for it to be “objective.”
No, atheists do not have a set belief system besides “There are no Gods/Goddesses.” So, how do atheists believe “everything” is subjective again? There are objective realities, that funnily enough, religious people constantly want to disprove because it goes against their religious beliefs. That is the real joke of the day. See, you have demonstrated that you do no actually know what you are arguing against. You think you know about atheists and what they must be like, but your assertions in that post show that you do not.

[SaeedinPakistan]

Re: Sins