re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low
^^ Some times i feel i shld have gone for rather than engineering. ![]()
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low
^^ Some times i feel i shld have gone for rather than engineering. ![]()
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
First Player wanted me to compare sachin's percentage with Jayawardene and then he didnt like it so he got me a list of players assuming i wont be able to collect the data and when i did bring the data he put it aside saying Tendulkar has better rate of scoring 100's. I mean if u think the data i collected means nuthing why wud u even ask for it and if u did ask for it then do agree with me that he doesnt enjoy winning bites after scoring a 100 as often as other players do. Y ... well we have number of reasons but we can discuss em when Player does agree that other players are better at winning games after scoring 100 :).
Kyon jhooth bolte ho mere bhai ? Allah se daro :D
Lets compare the Tendulkar and Jawardene ... who has better percentage of winning the game after hitting a ton.... Shell we ?
My point was in the original title of the thread which has now been changed :( The point was to look at Sachin's record in isolation and say whether his tons means a loss for the team, and a 69% win ratio means an emphatic NO !!
I never started the thread to say that Sachin has a better win record than X,Y, Z.
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
he doesnt enjoy winning bites after scoring a 100 as often as other players do. Y ... well we have number of reasons but we can discuss em when Player does agree that other players are better at winning games after scoring 100 :).
That was not the topic of this thread at all. Maybe that deserves a separate thread :D
Re: Sachin has lost the most matches after scoring a 100
Pakilarka does have a point and he has showed it by stats. There is no need to be personal, rather shows you are loosing an argument.
My post was on a DIFFERENT thread that he opened.. when it was being dscussed on this thread... obviously a mod agrees with me since somebody merged the threads..
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
well we have number of reasons but we can discuss em when Player does agree that other players are better at winning games after scoring 100 :).
This makes no sense. Its a team game. It isnt SRTs fault if the other batters dont support him or the bowling is bakvaas.
I am still waiting for you reason. If the reason is just badluck, then heck why are we even dscussing this :)
Re: Sachin has lost the most matches after scoring a 100
My post was on a DIFFERENT thread that he opened.. when it was being dscussed on this thread... obviously a mod agrees with me since somebody merged the threads..
Maybe it does make sense to have a separate thread for the point that Pakilarka is trying to make - that Sachin's tons have a lower win percentage than others.
Re: Sachin has lost the most matches after scoring a 100
Pakilarka does have a point and he has showed it by stats. There is no need to be personal, rather shows you are loosing an argument.
The original post targets the notion that SACHIN HITS 100 MEANS INDIA LOSES.. the stat produced by pakilarka itself proves the point.. India loses only 30% of the game where SRT scores a ton.. hence SACHIN HITS 100 MEANS INDIA LOSES is incorrect.. nobody has lost the argument.
Also.. you lose an argument.. not loose it :D
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low
I asked for u permission before comparing players and u aquasized on the condition that i have data to back my argument up… but once data was provided u went on with rate of scoring 100.
Your point doesnt need back of his whole record if tendulkar scored only one ton where he won the match it wud be suffiecint to say Tendulkar ton doesnt mean india will lose.
Thats y opened a new thread.
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
This makes no sense. Its a team game. It isnt SRTs fault if the other batters dont support him or the bowling is bakvaas.
I am still waiting for you reason. If the reason is just badluck, then heck why are we even dscussing this :)
Well lets just agree on the first part that YES TENDULKAR DIDNT WIN AS MANY GAMES AS OTHER STAR BATSMAN AFTER SCORING A TON. I understand its a team game and it doesnt really matter if makes sense to u or not coz i am talking FACTS HERE.
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low
No doubt Sachine is great batsman ![]()
but i was wondering that he scored 5 Centuries against Pakistan and India won only 1 match and lost remaining 4.
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low
He is not great against Pakistan ![]()
Re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning % comparatively lo
Title of thread now politically correct
Re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning % comparatively lo
I think its 5
Re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning % comparatively lo
Politically correct but not factually correct ![]()
My stand is that “Sachin’s tons do not win games is a myth”.
Re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning % comparatively lo
I think its 5
Its 4...India won the Sharjah game.
Re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning % comparatively lo
I wonder who is the unluckiest bowler who has worst percentage of losing the game after claiming 5 wickets.
Re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning % comparatively lo
it appears that the point of the "sachin loses more than others after 100" is just to point out that he is unlucky.... alright point taken. not digested or agreed with but taken.
Re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning % comparatively lo
Or cud be that he scored mostly on flat tracks where 100 didnt really mean a lot ?
Here is something more.
These are Statistics Against Major Teams, Aus, SA, Pak, WI, Sri, NZ, ENG
Restored attachments:
Re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning % comparatively lo
.
Re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning % comparatively lo
pakilarka.. take a look at his test avgs in various continents as well.. the real cricket..
i also dont agree that 100s on the subcontinent "dont mean a lot"