Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

Good job debunking the myth :slight_smile:

New Delhi: Mumbai Indians vs Kochi Tuskers Kerala should have been discussed for all the right reasons. There was an excellent exhibition of batting and of a fearlessness that defined the game. Sachin Tendulkar’s first IPL and T20 hundred came in a trademark classy style and then Mahela Jayawardene and Brendon McCullum replied with a fearlessness that was imperative to lift the team after two straight losses.
But what was disappointing to see was the usual refrain about how the team loses when Tendulkar hits a century. In the last one year and despite the fact that he was instrumental in India lifting the World Cup just over a couple of weeks ago, there has been this myth that seems to have been built around his hundreds. While everyone eagerly waits for a big knock from Tendulkar, they are equally wary about the outcome of a game once he gets to the three-figure mark. And so it has become important to bust the myth and state the facts as they stand.

http://static.cricketnext.com/pix/sitepix/04_2011/tendulkarton_1604_630.jpg

Sachin Tendulkar has hit 99 international hundreds with 51 coming in Test matches and 48 in one-day internationals.
In Tests alone, 20 of Tendulkar’s hundreds have come in winning causes, another 20 have come in games that have either been draws or no results, and only 11 have come in a losing cause. Of those 11 occasions, it was often Tendulkar who stood tall amongst the ruins. His 114 against Australia at Perth in 1991-92 series is considered to be among his finest hundreds. But with no support from the other end and Kiran More, who batted at No. 10 in that game, being the second top scorer with 43 there was no way India could have won the match.
In the second innings of the first Test against England at Edgbaston in 1996, it was Tendulkar again who scored a masterly 122 out of a total of 219 as Chris Lewis picked up a five-wicket haul to run through the Indian innings.
His third hundred in a losing cause came when he captained the team to South Africa in the 1996-97 series. Playing the New Year Test at Newlands, Cape Town and facing South Africa’s mammoth first innings score of 529/7 declared, Tendulkar walked in at No. 5 with the team reeling at 33/4. It soon became 58/5 but the champion was undeterred. He smashed 169 in an innings that was studded with 24 boundaries. And for once he found support in Mohammad Azharuddin who scored an excellent 115. But once Azhar was run out after a 222-run stand, the others failed to keep their wickets. Tendulkar was the last man to be dismissed.
The 1998-99 season was surely the heartbreak year for the little master. His 177 against Australia in the Bangalore Test gave India a healthy total of 424, but with a second innings collapse India lost the Test by eight wickets. Then during the tour of New Zealand, Tendulkar scored 113 in the second innings of the Wellington Test, thereby giving India the chance to set the Kiwis a target of 213 that they chased down with four wickets to spare. A month later, Tendulkar - battling an immense back pain - hit 136 against Pakistan in the Chennai Test that India lost by an agonising 12 runs. Nayan Mongia (58) and Rahul Dravid (10) were the only other two batsmen to get to double figures in that match.
Again and again, it was Tendulkar who put up a fight. It was Tendulkar who fought till the last ball.
Seven of his eleven Test hundreds in losing causes came in the decade of the 90s. And as Team India turned over a new leaf and Tendulkar found support, his hundreds came in more and more winning causes. From 2001 to 2011, Tendulkar has hit 27 Test hundreds - 15 of which have come in winning causes.
In one-day internationals as well, 33 of Tendulkar’s 48 hundreds have come in winning causes, while 13 have come in losing causes and two in matches that yielded no result.
His first five one-day hundreds, each against different opponents, all came in winning causes and it wasn’t till the league game against Sri Lanka in Delhi during the 1996 World Cup that a hundred from Tendulkar’s blade had gone in vain.
While his Test hundreds in 1998-99 ended up in losing causes, the champion - starting with that amazing 134 against Australia in Sharjah in 1998 - hit 11 of his next ODI hundreds in winning causes.
From 2001 to 2011, Tendulkar has hit 21 ODI hundreds and 12 of those have come in winning causes, while one came in the tied game against England in the World Cup. And again his hundreds in losing causes too came in games where the others failed the team.
Chasing 329 against Pakistan in Rawalpindi in 2003-04, Tendulkar hit 141 with extras coming in second best with 37. His next hundred, 123 vs Pakistan at Motera, Ahmedabad in 2004-05 helped India get to 315, but the bowlers failed to defend the target. And who can forget the 175 against Australia in Hyderabad where India lost by three runs chasing 350. In that game as well, the other batsmen barring Suresh Raina (59) failed to contribute and Tendulkar was once again the lone ranger.
In all, his 99 international hundreds have seen India home on 53 occasions, while 24 of them have come in losing causes and 22 have come in games that have been either drawn or tied or seen no results. I rest my case!
(Statistical inputs by Rajneesh Gupta)

http://cricketnext.in.com/news/mega-myth-busted-sachin-tons-dont-win-games/56595-13.html

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

Did we ever have any doubt.person who is following sachin would know how many of his centuries gave victory.even those lost games like175,143 against aussies,143 against pakistan test match were one of his finest innings ever its the team that's let him down

About the haters
ignorance is bliss :)

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

The thing is that he has scored so many centuries that probably despite a W/L of more than 2, he probably would still have scored more centuries being on loosing side than any other player.
But i do think he is obsesses with his personal performance and someone said all superachievers like Tendulkar have to be. I dont think even on Indias WC win he was entirely happy, the look on his face showed that.

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

Icon.... disagreed... the look on sachins face at the WC win said at alll..I have no idea how you can say that he did not look happy...

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low

:smack:

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low

:smack: :smack: :smack: :smack:

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

More than the number of matches won with Sachin scoring 100s, I think the number of matches that India would have LOST MISERABLY if he hadn't fired (whether 50 or 100) is a huge and much bigger number.

Only fools and some smart but jealous people can truly feel taht Sachin 100s are no good for India.

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

and yet two days ago - he scored his first century in IPL and mumbai indians lost that match :D

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

^ so you can decide which if the two categories of naysayers you want to be in! :)

or hopefully, you are in a 3rd category, which says that just for the fun of it

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

:D

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

Tendulkar is a selfish player....a great player...but mighty selfish

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

Its more of a teasing from opponents than any reality.

There was a time when Indian team was depended on his batting but since the other three (Gangs, Laxman and Dravid) geared up to their full capacity the burden was shared equally. I don't think Tendulkar played any Misbahuesqe selfish innings, though he had be accused on couple of occasions. But a player like him would always believe in giving his 100%. He is in different league than what people drag him into.
I think when Pakistanis drag him down in their talks/posts during Ind-Pak matches, its purely because they know he can ruin the game for their team. Deep inside everyone in cricket world salutes him regardless of his/her nationality.

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

Indeed he is a great and respected player..

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

how many of his hundreds among (33 winning ODI 100's) came against Mino's ?

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low

Who cares ? :snooty:

Btw, also look at games that India won where Sachin did not score a century but was still the highest scorer for the team.

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low

i think its 15 or 16 :hehe:

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low

Its actually 9 considering Zimbabwe a minnow, but well tried :smiley:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_international_cricket_centuries_by_Sachin_Tendulkar

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low

Anyone can change the stats from Wikipedia :smiley:

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

Sure they can...so prove that it was changed ;)

re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low

I dont want to prove anything i just said what i knew :)