Re: Eid milad un nabi is biddat - Saudi mufti
Nope, I am not angry, nor full of rage, nor jumping up and down [at present] although i do do this at times.
Good for you than.****
If your objection is to me and that ‘‘I said’’ …does it even need answering. This is not about me
You will have to be braver, if you actually object to the people who totally forbid Mawlid to be referred to as deviants and state this.
If your objection is to me, then that is neither here nor there
**Well, at least you got one part right this is not about you. And the other part is this is not about me too. It’s about deen, the way it was thought, the way it was followed by sahabas and that’s the way we need to follow. At least for me this is what it’s about. Now, I know for a fact from Quran and Haidths that Mawlid were not celebrated back than nor this was the teaching of ****RasoolAllah SallAllahu Alaihi wa Ahlihi wa Sallam. ******
So since you have been claiming that “Mawlids were celebrated back than too and it’s an active part of Islam and person who does not celebrate it is not from us (muslims)” so on and so forth. Hence my question to you is if that is your claim, prove it in the light of Quran and Sahi haidths?
Ok, you do not see that you both came with a similar shaitanic non islamic attachments clearly visible? and that you both agree with each other on Mawlid as well. The similarities are interesting
Shaitanic attachments??? Well I don’t know about the other person and at this point I don’t care. But could you point out my attachment?? BUT if you are once again referring to my previous signature, than don’t even bother. Because to me that is already dealt with.****
I understand, but what is it about Mawlid that you are contending? Is it that it that it is celebrated, is it that its a birth celebration or that its a birthday celebration? or do you say it is Bidah dalala [bad innovation], or it is Haram, or it is impermissible? or something else, like if you have to practice it?
Also 1400 years ago when the Deen was introduced to us we were given Shariah, this is what we use to see the permissibility of an act or occasion. Earlier you asked regarding who we follow and I said we follow Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah, who in turn follow Tabieen and Sahaba who in turn followed RasoolAllah SallAllahu Alaihi wa Ahlihi wa Sallam, we WILL have to go back to this point because although you did not contend this point at the time, i think you failed to grasp the stark differences between our approach your approach [the salafi fallacy]
Allah says in the Quran: “This day I have perfected your religion for you, completed my favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion” [Noble Quran 5:4]****
RasoolAllah SallAllahu Alaihi wa Ahlihi wa Sallam****** said: “I have left behind me two things, if you cling to them you will never go astray. They are the Book of Allah and my Sunnah” [al-Hakim]******
And “…so cling to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly guided caliphs after me, even if it be with your teeth” [Bukhari]****
**And “every newly invented matter (in religion) is a bid’ah and every bid’ah is a dalaalah (misguidance) and every dalaalah is in the (hell) Fire.” [Reported by At-Tirmithi].
So my friend you tell me in lightof the above does you claim stands about Mawlid, which is it can be and should be celebrated??****
—Quote—
"This fact has been presented here to you. Its not something you are familiar with but its a FACT. Your trip up an innovated path which see such action as Shirk is not from Islam. That is why Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah built Mazaars from the east to the west, from the north to the south! Because the Muslims were keen on seeking aid at Qabars. Any way its a practice that we had had in our [Muslims] Entirety. You have me on record claiming this!
The reason you are surprised by this is because of the propagation of newer sects as I have mentioned. "
*Prove it, prove your above claim, can you?? I’m all ears to you. * —End Quote— Yes, this is certainly an area that I can prove, In Sha Allah
My believe is on Quran and sahi Ahadith and not because of any propaganda or any new sects. Hence I’m waiting for you to still prove you claims in light of Quran and sahi Ahadith.****
You were contending my words ‘‘like i said’’ so I explained, if you wanted me to prove my claims you need to object to the claim. You need to understand yourself what you are saying and doing.
Hmmm, well I thought I was. I thought asking one to prove one’s claim comes only after objecting to it. I thought you we paying attention.. I guess I thought wrong and I hope it’s clear to you know. If not ask.****
I notice you are concerned about how you look to others and another reference here to others. Dude there is no-one reading this
You say you are standing up to me, but its not exactly clear what you are standing up to me regarding. You have done your talking in questions, which do not clarify your view at all. I wouldn’t exactly call that standing up, I’d say it was a position so protective of your ego/pride/image that you wont even state your opinions. Btw since you have asked questions and not made statements, i am not encouraging you to make statements that you do not have.
Once again, I thought you were smart enough to get my questions right on the first place. I guess you can only talk nothing ells.****
By the way will have to try much more harder to get me upset. Making me sound as if I’m making it a personal issue by talking about ego, pride, image, propaganda, new sect will not even tickle me. In fact I suggest quit doing that.****
**You know what, i it might me difficult explaining yourself here or putting forward your proves or whatever it might me. So I’ll make it easy for you. I can meet you and talk about it that is if you are in same place as I am or I can call you. Maybe than you would be able to convenience me with proven facts that your claims false / **bid’ah / dalaalah. What say?