I want to ask the same question to Numb. :)
My first question is regarding mirza ghulam ahmed Qadyani's quotes about cursing. here they are:
mirza writes;
"Cursing is not the style of a Truthful person. Faithful (M’omin) does not curse."
(Izala-e-Auham p.660)
Yet when you open his book Nur-ul-Haq, volume 8 of Roohani Khazain. From pages 158 - 162, 5 pages, he has cursed his opponent thousand times, LITERALLY, writing CURSE1 CURSE2 CURSE3 and so on, until he literally finishes writing thousand curses.
what should I call him? A liar? A person suffering from amnesia? The unfaithful curser?
There are some more examples of his abusive and foul language;
"The** STUPID and ILLITERATE and EVIL (KAMEENA) NATURED** certain Aryans of Qadian...." (Nuzool-e-Maseeh p.6)
"Wicked-natured Lekhram. Alas! This seed of profanity and obscenity was brought by Dayanand in this country.... Lekhram Peshawari who was absolutely stupid and a boil (Aablaa)." (Cashma-e-Maarifat p.3)
"These** KAMEENA-natured** people were already eager to criticise and on top of that they got hold of some Mischievous and Stupid Christians and Satanic Inclinations instructed them they are all true, thus they also took their share of this Black face and Embarrassment, which is now evident on the faces of Stupid Christian Priests." (Arya dharam. p.47)
- "Except for the CHILDREN OF PROSTITUTE, whose hearts have been sealed by God, everyone else believes in me and has accepted me.”
(Aina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, Roohani Khazain vol.5 p.547)
- "I have God’s inspiration that 'he who does not follow you and will not enter your Ba’ith and remain your opponent, he is disobedient of God and His Prophet, Hellish."
(Advertisement in M’ayaar-ul-Akhyar by Mirza Ghulam p.8)
And another one:
It is never our way to address our opponents with any kind of harsh words in debates and disagreements or in our writings or to utter heart-breaking words for hi or for his elders....(Shuhna-e-Haq...)
How chilidish is this compilation!
Let me list the "cursing" you have pointed out.
1: La'nat to his opponents. It is nothing strange. God sends Lanat to Kuffar who oppose the prophets and He doesn't stop at that alone. He also includes Lanat from all the angels and all the people who ever existed, will exist to go out against the opponents of Prophets. read suah Baqarah. So sending Lanat against the blasphemers, enemies of Allah and Islam is not wrong, but absolutely Islamic.
Stupid, Jahil and Kameena etc etc. Quran uses the same words against the enemies of Islam, and Arya were the worst enemies of Islam in those days.. research the key words "Rangeela Rusool" on google. Quran also calls such enemies as Dogs, Monkeys, Pigs, Cattle, Donkey etc etc.
Again, Stupid Christians, Idiot priests etc etc. Nothing wrong with that, especially if the Christians are attacking the Holy Prophet (saw).
Children of Prostitutes!! Where did you get that from.. The word is Zuriyyatul Baghaya, translated Children of Wickedness.. But Mullah prefers the word prostitute.. So no wonder this allegations comes up every time.
Again, the promise of not using harsh words was for those who stick to standards of debate. Those who attacked the Holy Prophet (saw) lose the right to be addressed mildly. This is the Quranic way.