Re: Zardari interview in WSJ/asks for $100billion, terms Kashmir fighters as terroris
Here the obvious truth is, Benazir ki death se Zardari ki lottery nikal aai hai. As we can see, he is the whole sole authority in the Govt. No one else can say or do anything, especially those from the ruling coalition. Neither anyone utters a word, when he goes flat before Sarah Palen making a mockery of himself, nor anyone says anything when he asks for $100 bn. Ofcourse he wants to make the most of whatever comes to Pakistan, on the name of democracy, Benazir Bhutto, economy or fighting Terrorism. Poor people of Pakistan have to just wait and see Zardari looting the whole nation and then moving abroad as self-exile till he gets another NRO.
And by the way, this time is the President, so constitionally, no court can summon him up.
Isay kehte hen , sahi Lottery!!!
I wonder what happened to accountability sense of parhay likhay while they blame "jaahil" of electing worst leaders.
In todays world, parhay likhay can be jaahil too.
100 billion $ is more than twice current debt of the country (and 25% of the GDP in terms of PPP).. so Zardari want to triple the total loan overnight !!
He asked for grants, not loans. Grants, you do not pay back. $100b loan is more likely to happen than a $100b grant.
The guy is out of his mind, and it nothing but a reflection of the people.
First ? I thought we have been through the election drill many times but we always end up having same crooks turn by turn and now its Zardari's Turn while NS waiting to turn the tables :)
Nope, everytime there is "dictatorship-break" the cycle restarts, so this is first election :)
perhaps you did not understand my question. In the absence of any polls on this issue, what makes you certain, that people in sindh or sarhad, share the same sentiments as people of punjab. It may not be a high priority issue for them, as it is for punjab. May be Zardari knows it.
The sentiments of the people are obvious, they are behind the Kashmiris, no matter what the ruling politicians think. The people of Sarhad have even fought for the Kashmiris.
Re: Zardari interview in WSJ/asks for $100billion, terms Kashmir fighters as terroris
AAZ humiliates himself and Pak everyday. I sadly feel its better if Pak collapses economically, atleast then it can rebuild from the bottom up-properly. Else, its just papering over cracks until the next time.
He asked for grants, not loans. Grants, you do not pay back. $100b loan is more likely to happen than a $100b grant.
The guy is out of his mind, and it nothing but a reflection of the people.
hmm grant is more problematic than loan.. b'cos grants will come with certain conditions.. No one give free money or without interest that too in such times..
Like in India's case during 1991 we had to open our market for US and other western companies (in name of free trade..)..
^^ I thought democratically elected leaders were a reflection of the people?
Great Zardari (The President of Pakistan) is indeed reflecting the Pakistani people's opinion. He is elected as President of Pakistan with over 2/3 of the votes, and is the Chairman of PPP - the party leading the government that was voted in by the people for the people. So when Great Zardari (President of Pakistan) says that Inida is NOT, and has NEVER BEEN a threat to Pakistan, then it is the position of Pakistani government and people. :)
hmm grant is more problematic than loan.. b'cos grants will come with certain conditions.. No one give free money or without interest that too in such times..
Like in India's case during 1991 we had to open our market for US and other western companies (in name of free trade..)..
That is why I laugh so hard.. Zardari is an idiot, asking for such large grants.
No they didnt, criminals are barred from contesting elections BUT we have the NRO. End of Discussion.
Re: Zardari interview in WSJ/asks for $100billion, terms Kashmir fighters as terroris
People voted for the MNAs of their choice, not Zardari. Zardari is a criminal, and if the legal system wasn't raped by the dictator, Zardari would have been barred from holding office.
People voted for the MNAs of their choice, not Zardari. Zardari is a criminal, and if the legal system wasn't raped by the dictator, Zardari would have been barred from holding office.
People knew very well who would come in to power when they cast their votes. Zulfiqar A. Bhutto, Benazir Bhutto, Asif Zardari, now Bilawal's name is changed to Bhutto so he too can cling on to power. Do you not see a trend?
The people democratically voted for a corrupt monarchy.
People knew very well who would come in to power when they cast their votes. Zulfiqar A. Bhutto, Benazir Bhutto, Asif Zardari, now Bilawal's name is changed to Bhutto so he too can cling on to power. Do you not see a trend?
The people democratically voted for a corrupt monarchy.
The law bars Zardari from holding office. If there is anyone to blame for Zardari being 'above' the law, its the NRO, which is illegal. We dont have an independent judiciary to rule the NRO as being illegal. Wasnt Nawaz Sharif prevented from taking office because of his record, by the law? Ironically, the person who came up with the NRO in hopes to retain his kursi was sent packing a little while after.