Zardari interview in WSJ/asks for $100billion, terms Kashmir fighters as terrorists

One thing is certain and that is, between two evils, Zardari and Nawaz ... Zardari harmed the country least and is 100s of time much better than Nawaz for the country.

:rotfl:

Re: Zardari interview in WSJ/asks for $100billion, terms Kashmir fighters as terroris

^ exactly!

Re: Zardari interview in WSJ/asks for $100billion, terms Kashmir fighters as terroris

Ama ! Kya patriotism hai. President ko hi gali de rahe??????????.

Presidents dekhne ho to hamare yahan aiye............

Re: Zardari interview in WSJ/asks for $100billion, terms Kashmir fighters as terroris

In the closed parliament session, Gen. Pasha has named India as one of the culprits behind the destabilization of Pakistan.

So if Bal Thackery/Advani becomes your president, would you start loving him (if not already)? Do all Americans love Bush?

Re: Zardari interview in WSJ/asks for $100billion, terms Kashmir fighters as terroris

^ yes in true democracy people should be able to criticise their leaders and their policy..

Re: Zardari interview in WSJ/asks for $100billion, terms Kashmir fighters as terroris

^ Tell that to imanindian

i m curious how do u know that, yea i havent been in touch with news so dont ambush me.

simple, jang.com.pk

Re: Zardari interview in WSJ/asks for $100billion, terms Kashmir fighters as terroris

[QUOTE]
So if Bal Thackery/Advani becomes your president
[/QUOTE]

' IF ' is a vauge term 'Are Not' is reality.

'IF' is not a "vauge" term, it presents a hypothetical situation, thank you for dodging the answer though... as expected.

Re: Zardari interview in WSJ/asks for $100billion, terms Kashmir fighters as terroris

Ah yes a hypothical situation like:

OBL running Pakistan.

Pak nukes in hands of terrorists.

Whole Kashmir a part of India.

4) I am Bill Clintons Daddy :)


Thank you again for proving your dodging capabilities.