Diamonnd if you read my earlier post on this thread u would get it.
r.v i wasnt directing at u personaly as a perve accuser- although u have too like other guppans have supported this female ideology on gup.shup.
my posts are not personally directed at you...however it does seems that wherever or whenever i enter a thread on gup.shup in no short time you find i see u having to pop up forming an inclusive section to argue with me.
as i asserted in my above post. Im not advocating modern or past polygamous manly behaviour. Infact I possess a extreme dislikeing for it....to which i like raising the awareness of towards in answering to some extent the modern day popular social problem of women complaining about cheating/two timeing men.
and i read your given link above on the law of 4 wives.
well...and i found something related rather interesting
Prophet King Soloman (pbuh) had 700 wives and 300 concubines.
Now Would you kindly enlighten us what the Oxford citionary meaning and of Concubine means. And what are the purpose of concubines?
I would place a million pound bet if in todays time a man had not 300 but even 3 concubines....no women would stand short of calling him a perve.
why the double standards.....
once again im not advocating men with polygamous inclinations..
All im doing here is trying, to express thats its possible that such intrinsic natures of men have been there throughout time, including with thre prophets and pious personalites, as you see above.
So rather than shun men particular men or 90% of men, maybe and maybe this knowledge can benefit you, that maybe it is a partly a genetic problem.
and help answering to some extent the questions of such threads opened.
botom line:
I mean that as in the same way in every male and female the natural God-given sexual urges are present- it is possible that opposed to womens but monogamous, males have been additinally procreated with with polygamous urges.
Therefore the same way you see phenomenon on society of pre-marriage fornicating men and women, due to them being unable to contain the innate urges, it is very posible the ever increasing phenomenon in men being unable to contain themslves wtih single ladies could be similarly relating to the innate polygamous nature they possess.
In todays time, men and women are still the same as they were in since thier creation.
they have the same carnal desires as the men and women of earlier times, except that society and conditions have changed.
The legal and financial ease with which a man could have another women in the past, does not exist today. But as the carnal desires still exist, you see some men who succumb.
Maybe in simple terms.,..maybe this is partly why men cannot bloody contain themself, even after already having one girl for the the outlet....and the reason for somany of girls frustratiuons feeling cheated.
I dont like to quote this. But it is not uncommon 1400 years ago, pious sahabi personalities have upset thier wives i.e h.fatima by having extre-maritia;l relations.
There is are some sahah hadiths on H.Ali having had polygamnous s.relations in additon to his current wife. H.Fatima, to which he incurred complainst on to the Prophet (pbuh).
And the girl/girls he was involved with were not his wive whom he had to bear the burden of treating equally, they/she was his slave girl/s, similar as above to the one of KING SOLOMAN (pbuh) and his 300 concubines (PBUH) above.
And I think now i will have to quote the related hadiths very soon.
Lastly: If anybody find it hard to comprehand what im saying..please read me again slowly and carefully from the beggining, and my posts on the previous poge.
Im sure i have made myself clear.I hope i dont have to make myself clearer, because i have already recieved postive feedback on my posts from Women on this thread shwoing im doing ok, and for certain lacking individuals i am not going to keep repeating myself.
And my only purpose is to help this thread by pointing out the truth.
