Yup .. when west .............
...................., else i do not care to reply.
Your post is completely biased and based on limited knowledge.
**I do not see a single link in your post. Just read and do your own search/research. **One clue I can give is you read about what those muslims rulers had to say when they came to this land....start by looking their books.
Muslims prior to Babar had to come to Indiain subcontinent since local hindu ruler being the bad guy and treating locals ruthlessly and abducted arab families for which a teenager had to come and fight with local ruler after repeated warnings were ignored.
Babar was disaapointed that he had no other place to go but dark place Hindustan/India while his other family members ruled places like China.
Babur was not even a warrior but a gentleman with qualities like a writer and a poet.
The concept of universities is very young perhaps just after medieval times....
Before that knowledge was transferred to others by walking and talking teachers and professors......
BTW you gave examples of Harvard.....Do you know the even west is not ashamed of admitting their dark ages and gives credit to muslms and their knowledge which later on became the basis of modern knowledge.
Arab scientists knew many things BEFORE west came to know how to use those things..which west did not know..in terms of astronomy, chemistry and mathematics, metallergy, music, art and clothigs,.....Your assignment is to look for those things and read books on it.
Your denial just makes me think you hate muslims and are being thankless person.
Muslims thoughout the indian subcontinent and brought people of knowledge from all over the world and had discussions and lectures in Indian subcontinent.
Muslims rulers even tried to give incentives to the Just do search on muslims universities or teaching institutions.. Also you will learn how systematically muslim universities and institutions are being forced to lose their identity and curriculum is being changed.
Sati..the ultimate crime against humanity and women....
You mentioned Sati reason like other before tried to make us believe...not new to me at least...
Sati has nothing to do with muslims....its a hindu religious tradition in telling women they will go to swarg if they die with her husband and their husband is the final destiny for them...and..... if they live after their husband dies NO one will consider you honorable women...there has been a long thread on it on this forum and no one could prove YOUR point.....
and *it was banned by Aurengzeb in some 1659 .....way before Mohan even dreamed of banning it ( he was born in 1771). Indian/Bharati media is DEAD WRONG! *
Later, British also tried to ban this act in 1829.
Now remember..........Sati was present BEFORE muslims even came to Indian subcontinent and is described in your own book Mahabharta!
Tell me why it is still practiced after 1947 in parts of India/Bharat?
I bet you..you cannot bring anything to this forum which would link muslims to being the reason for this crime against humanity practiced in hinduism for centuries.
This should be the last time any Hindu try to blame Muslims for this horrible and inhuman crime against women and (their children). And this post can be made a reference to all ignrant people who try to impose all their ill- deeds on muslims.
I am surprised you ask me about the language......this shows your lack of knowledge of your own land.
So did you ask why mother/father-in-law do not allow widowed women to be married?...Answer will perhaps surprise you...Its been a hindu religious practice...a woman who's husband dies has no right to re-mary.
All other points you raised have no meaning....and if i have time will answer...
You sure have proven to be ill-educated /biased/full of hatred aginst muslims..perhaps you had learned wrong things about muslims in schools in India/Bharat or read only those things which some muslims did indeed do wrong,,but not the greater good to this piece of land.