Re: What has Hinduism given to the world?
This is what I wrote yesterday in response to a thread (Hindu Philosophy) with a question from Sadiyah. Some of the issues debated in this thread are relevant to my message. I am taking the liberty to copy and paste my message to Sadiyah.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sadiyah
Also, if Hinduism is a way of life, then it should be covering all aspects of how to lead one's life. Is such the case? If it is, then shouldn't there be teachings telling you what to do in most situations. If it does, do people follow it and could you give examples of such teachings where it shows how to lead one's life..
There is no ONE book that lays out the rules of life. There are all kinds of scriptures, some of them tell parables with a moral. These scriptures were not revealed to ONE person and then put down on paper. They are an amalgamation of thousands of years of life experiences and they were added onto through the ages. This is why a lot of the scriptures are dynamic in thier flow.. a lot of them reflect the social and political situation at THAT PARTICULAR TIME OF WRITING. For example the Laws of Manu.. that are quoted with relish by western and non hindu people. The laws of Manu are harsh towards women and are totally reflective of the time they were written. Since then much else has been written that negates what Manu said. The laws of Manu have been eclipsed by change in time and circumstances. There are other scriptures you can look at or follow if you do not agree with what Manu says. Hinduism lays great emphasis on individual beings making decisions on morality by themselves. The books are just pointers. This is why Hinduism is so inclusive of many sects and subsects and has remained dynamic through the ages.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sadiyah
I am a little confused because at one end some are saying it's mainly a philosophy; however, at the other end you're telling me that it's a way of life. I don't have a problem with either one. Given that this has confused me, could you please clarify the two and tell me how the two go together. Thank you. .
There is the freedom given (implicitly not explicitly) to Hindus to follow the religion as a philosophy or as a way of life. Those that wish to treat the scriptures as gospel and live thier lives ritually just as described in the scriptures can do that. Those that wish to just take the essence of the scriptures are also allowed to do that and use that as a philosophical touchstone may do that too. Hinduism is quite laise faire in its application and it seems to work well since people can tailor it to thier needs. It can sometimes lead to strife (acute casteism etc), but people are given the freedom to make the good and bad decisions by themselves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sadiyah
ssingh, I have a few convert friends who converted from Hinduism to Islam. Initially their families didn't take it well and were not very pleased with it. They weren't happy with the fact that they converted out of Hinduism. Could you please shed some light on it, as you said conversion is something Hindus don't care about? .
There is general concensus in the scriptures that Hindus are born and not made... in other words there is no ritualistic conversion. Anyone can live or think like a Hindu, but does not have to have a Hindu star pinned to his lapel to declare that he lives or thinks like a Hindu. If it makes someone happy to create a shiny star and create some sort of ritual to pin it on themselves they are free to do so. The more conservative Hindus will not consider it of any importance. They will appreciate that someone else appreciates thier philosphy or way of life but thats it.. no need to change themselves.
Apart from historic reasons of hindu/muslim strife, the families of your friends who converted may also be upset because conversion is so NOT a part of Hinduism, they do not know why anyone needed to or could convert.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sadiyah
Also, in general, I'd appreciate if someone could explain the Hindu philosophy. I know Rahul made an attempt; however, it was way too concise for me to get the actual essence of the message. It doesn't have to be too long, but detailed enough that I can get a clear picture. Thank you..
Philosophy is simple.. there is some entity that created the world. Call it Eshwar or what have you. That is the BIG CHEESE. There are other dieties created to keep us all in place and upright moral citizens. These dieties live lives like us.. make war, have lovers, have fights, have children, hold jobs etc. These are called the Avatars (Krishna, Ganesh, Shiva etc). Indian Mythology is based on thier colorful lives. We learn from thier examples to lead our own lives. There is no... Krishna said to .. jump 3 times so we do it.... even the Gita is philosphical in nature. You do not have to do what it says in a literal sense. Idols of these Avatars are made and worshipped so that we always have an example close to us, something that reminds us to live good lives... something concrete to jog our conciense if we make wrong choices in life.
Reincarnation is a whole another kettle of fish. There is no concept of heaven (except as a place that gods build thier mansions) and hell or hell fire. If we make bad or immoral choices in this life we will come back to this earth as a less evolved being and will have to start from scratch to build up our good deed account all over again. There is always hope! The blameless ones slip out of the birth death cycle and attain nirvana. Not really sure where nirvana folks go... some nice carribean island perhaps.. that would be nice!