Re: Thousands-strong mob attacks police station, burns man to death for alleged blasp
..there you go again , repeating your own earlier arguments , I said religion all religions ] , ....especially Abrahimic as a case among religion ] , because it claims Divine roots .
... Religion sanctions barbarity , its an inbuilt trait in any religion .... of course there are other factors too for the human barbarity ,but then it is called barbarity , ....but when its done in the name of religion , its condoned because religion allows it .......and people find arguments and justifications and reasons from within religion ....
Christanity sanctioned Inquistion , Islam sanctions blasphemy as well as Takfeer to declare other Kafirs , hence wajub-ul-Qatl ] ... you can argue about the wrongness of interpretations ...but that is exactly the point ...it is there ..in the first place ...that why its interpreted ....
so you see , we are going in circles ... so this is my last post on this subject ... if you want to understand it again.... then read my earlier posts again ...
I asked you if you belong to any non-Ibrahimic religion like Hinduism. You did not answer that.
So far you have not been able to show if you have anything against non-Ibrahim religions, I wonder why.
You have shown your inability to get the point that religious doctrines and even non-religious ideas or differences may not be at fault if individuals commit legal crimes and use these ideas as their motives.
You say people find reasons to commit barbarism in religions.
So why do you think people find reasons for barbarism in non-religious ideas or differences?
I expect you answer directly and say people are at fault, not the differences.
Can you?
BTW: Islam does not say a person automatically deserves death penalty on the basis of being infidel or Kaafir. You just made it up. Or have been reading biased media.