Re: Terrorism?
i meant he always appears to be looking kinda away, and I was wondering if its because he is hiding his eyes..or does he have similar eye problems like zia did. cross eyed I mean.
lol, it was meant for PCG. she kind of left me speechless. yes he does have some eye problem.
Re: Terrorism?
I think the news of him drowning are a bit exaggerated, he has weakened, and the powers that be have sent a message that he is not indispensible, and now expect him to be be a good boy and do their bidding in a beter manner, and you will see that happen once teh current wave is over.
and right now with the national mood against MQM he would be shooting himelf in the foot if he was appealing on an ethnic angle.
Re: Terrorism?
lol, it was meant for PCG. she kind of left me speechless. yes he does have some eye problem.
Thank u, i wanted to confirm because first I was going to say something but thought aybe I should not because if it is a physical condition then it would not be right to say anything about it. Thank you for confirming.
Re: Terrorism?
Iman se, I have so many galian bubbling up inside me towards this not-so Chief of a bacha justice
just your President..is now...begging **on the streets of Washington...like a beggar...from **NATO...from democrates...that send more soldiers in Afghanistan...send more in Iraq...send more money..to them....as your Political Bush has totally failed...hahahha...super power is begging **due to some thousands millitannts...so he now begging for **Iran and Syria to stop violence....
since your political President has also failed ...with all his advisors and hawks in his administration...i request you ...plz...start a compaign...for C in C of USA to take hold of White House...to restore your pride of Super Power..LOL.....as in your opinion...General in Pakistan.......can be better option...as he can fight on all fronts....just give a chance to C in C of USA also to try this....
well...inform me immediately ..when you will launch this campaign ...OK
Re: Terrorism?
oh but W is going to go byebye soon, and with a dem congress he is a lame duck president, he knows it, dems know it, and he knows that dems know it.
as far as US interests go, US will use iran and syria, who will play ball..such is
PS: US has had one president booted out before his term ended, how many PMs in pakistan? lets not compare an established democratic process with one which is dhakka start
Re: Terrorism?
lets not get personal here, I am not in a charitable mood these days.
oh yeah 2 minutes to edit that crap, cuz if i do it, it comes with a price :)
PS: Thank you
Re: Terrorism?
The political process was encountered in** 1954 when Gen.Ayub...having best relations over Sento or SEATO..with USA...in the **hotel of london...made a plan to throw off political govenment...but its another story...his friends latter became the masters...!!!!!!
every time USA played with us..not us...with every country....once the biggest supporter of Shah of Iran...and now he has a ulcer problem in introducing democracy in Iran and Iraq...need not to tell that USA previously also supported Saddam...
if this is** "established democratic process"** ...then 1000 lanat on that system..and on that country......
so lets try..Gen.Abi Zaid..or any Central Comman 5 stars guy....may be the beggar President of USA ...may restore some extra time from Begging !!!!!!
Re: Terrorism?
every country does whag it needs to do, its not that Pakistan has not used others or influenced others one way or the other in the pursuit of its goals.
btw...that post of yours is still there. so u leave me no choice.
Re: Terrorism?
correct...but when his chair is shaking...he is on the way of ethnicity...a drowning man catches at a straw....
He is fool then! How can a community representing only 5% of th population can save him. I think army and ISI is still backing him and they too sponsored Karachi carneage by keeping a blind eye just to punish the people who are bashing army. The bar assoication from Chakwal - the strong hold of army - demostrated that famous banner - saray murrabay tumharay liayan.
Moreover where all this carneage took place in Karachi is a mainly cantt and army area. In 60 years of Karachi's history - even in the worst cases of viloence here. This shahr-e-faisal was never shut down! Violence never occured here.
The army stood over there and saw people being killed - punishing them for condeming them.
Even you yourself requested the Karachi Corp commander to intervene. Somewhere you condemn the army and at other place u call them for help buddy.
Re: Terrorism?
with all due respect sir, that is exactly what MQM apologists say. (not at all calling you one). it was funny as well as annoying listening to mazhar abbas, the journalist, who has apparently pro-mqm leanings, blaming agnecies for blocking the transmission of cable channels in Sindh when the CJ was on his way to lahore. every other opposition person was telling mqm not to stage a counter rally in karachi. they didn’t listen because, as we all know, ‘MQM was always powerful’, and it had to tell the world that they own the city.
i’m not at all absolving agencies of their wrong doings in the past, but if truth be told, musharraf has been digging up his own grave. in any case, such scenario had to arise sooner or later, because musharraf wants himself elected again through the same parliament, and as per constitution, he cannot hold two office after this year. so if he wants to maintain status-quo he has to manipulate the system.
and btw, If musharraf is so stupid that he failed to see the outcome of such actions (and bragged about how people in karachi showed their power), he probably does not deserve to rule the country. 
Re: Terrorism?
errr which part do MQm apologists say .. about him being given messages from powers that be? I dont think MQM apologists even think about that stuff. I was not referring to agencies..atleast pakistani ones btw. something that has been under speculation for some time, with some recent high profile visits and daant, the writing was on the wall. remember Zia?
ppl in karachi did show their power, like it or not, they showed it, the statement is a fact, take political biases out of the assessment of that statement and people of karachi..in some way shape or form did show their power. Now that is a diff story that it was not ordinary citizens but political ghunday, but they did show their power. CJ had to go back..the city burnt etc etc.
as far as him ruling the country, i dont care if he does or someone else does as long as they can deliver positive results. if we go by a show of stupidity in some scenario as a reason to not be in power then our corridors of power would be empty.
Re: Terrorism?
umm so we shouldn't get rid of musharraf because we'd playing into hands of US? or we should get rid of him regardless of what US has in store and find a better replacement?
Re: Terrorism?
i don't understand why present us administration would like to weaken him. but the stream of 'strategic leaks' by western newspapers and the statements of newly elected democrats certainly did not strengthen him. which powers exactly you were referring to?
Re: Terrorism?
I am saying that....he not condemened MQM for killing...all know that who killed them...but why he not condemen that...just because of this cheap mentality !!!!
Re: Terrorism?
Pakistan..never involved in such dirty and malicious politics of others....these dirt and mud wrapping techniques are the hall mark of "established Democratic country" for 60 years...after WW2....a CIA is like a "angel jibreel" type reputation for it....!!!!!!
Pakitan never involved in this games of dirty mentality...chee chee chee ....
Re: Terrorism?
Pakistan..never involved in such dirty and malicious politics of others....these dirt and mud wrapping techniques are the hall mark of "established Democratic country" for 60 years...after WW2....a CIA is like a "angel jibreel" type reputation for it....!!!!!!
Pakitan never involved in this games of dirty mentality...chee chee chee ....
yeah taleban were a creation of nepal.
Re: Terrorism?
He is fool then! How can a community representing only 5% of th population can save him. I think army and ISI is still backing him and they too sponsored Karachi carneage by keeping a blind eye just to punish the people who are bashing army. The bar assoication from Chakwal - the strong hold of army - demostrated that famous banner - saray murrabay tumharay liayan.
Moreover where all this carneage took place in Karachi is a mainly cantt and army area. In 60 years of Karachi's history - even in the worst cases of viloence here. This shahr-e-faisal was never shut down! Violence never occured here.
The army stood over there and saw people being killed - punishing them for condeming them.
Even you yourself requested the Karachi Corp commander to intervene. Somewhere you condemn the army and at other place u call them for help buddy.
Mostar, on whose orders were roads blocked? On whose orders the IG police was made 'helpless'? police/rangers/army are supposed to take action when they're ordered to take action. the truth is MQM messed up big time and showed their dormant killer instinct once again, and now musharraf, who depends on their political support for the survival of present govt., will have to willingly or unwillingly defend them.
Re: Terrorism?
i don't understand why present us administration would like to weaken him. but the stream of 'strategic leaks' by western newspapers and the statements of newly elected democrats certainly did not strengthen him. which powers exactly you were referring to?
because Pakistan is run by military, this can all go away in a matter of weeks and the message to musharraf would be, you are not indispensible, so play ball. The acute weakness would be history and the lingering one would just be a reminder to be a good boy.
basially the same message Cheney recently delivered.
Re: Terrorism?
Mostar, on whose orders were roads blocked? On whose orders the IG police was made 'helpless'? police/rangers/army are supposed to take action when they're ordered to take action. the truth is MQM messed up big time and showed their dormant killer instinct once again, and now musharraf, who depends on their political support for the survival of present govt., will have to willingly or unwillingly defend them.
No doubt it was all MQM's work! But I think for the first time in history - army and ISI patronized them.
Re: Terrorism?
Army was never bashed in the history of Pakistan as it is being done today. The voices are coming up against it from its very own stronghold - the upper punjab.