Solution to problems in South East Asia

It is abundantly clear that the rifts amongst India Pakistan Afghanistan Bangla Desh are only working to keep us all down.

India’s problems of poverty and hygiene requires full crisis mode attention - not for impressing foreign visitors to IT corridors but as a basic human right.

Pakistan’s problems religious extremism and poverty similarly require same attention for same reasons.

Afghanistan’s problems of religious extremism and illiteracy …same thing

Bangla Desh’s problems of assured flooding and poverty…same thing

With each of the parties focusing on bilateral issues these fundamental problems have gone largely unattended to.

The only smart solution I see is for these four to merge into a federation with a federated government, shared resources and one united front in facing America, Russia, Europe and the rest of the world.

This has to be done as a federation of equals in a way that does not insult any of the parties, with sufficient safeguards to keep the religious and sectoral extremist elements out of power. For example the three smaller countries should not feel subordinated in any shape or form. I would suggest a name such as FSA / SAF (South Asian Federation), so that pre-fed identities such as Indian, Pakistani etc disappear gradually.

Ethnic, religious and linguistic borders for administrative states and provinces should be avoided, since these have proven divisive in all the 4 countries involved. Instead we’ll find a more scientific non-divisive way - may be by inhabited land area or number of people etc.

Water, Electricity, Defence, Highways, broadband Internet, free Education upto high school, primary income taxation, foreign policy, Shipping and a few other items should be at the federation.

The waterways should be connected so that the floods of east are diverted to the drylands of the west.

We can build from there.

How else do we stop apologizing for each other’s existence my friends?

Re: Solution to problems in South East Asia

The title should be South Asia, not South East Asia. How do I change that?

Re: Solution to problems in South East Asia

Give Kashmir the right to self-determination. Problem solved.

... for that to happen .... UN resolutions have to be "implemented" ... Pakistani forces and Pakistani origin people have to vacate the areas in POK and Northern Areas .... wanna press Pakistan to do that :D

Re: Solution to problems in South East Asia

LMAO! After 7 weeks, you still haven’t answered my one and only question :hehe:

It is you who is always running away fromthe fact … come on in simple Yes or No … tell me … as per UN resolutions … the solution to the Kashmir problem is “implementaion” of the UNCIP resolutions by India and Pakistan … you always run away … this time i will make it easy for you :smiley:

That hasn't happened in so many decades, so why would you think that is feasible. be realistic

Re: Solution to problems in South East Asia

Jalaludding
I get very emotional by your love for India. I know personally Pakistani Muslims who do not love Pakistan so much as you love India as being a Muslim minority who is being discriminated daily. So all the respect to you my friend.

I believe you are a Muslim right? If i am wrong please forgive me. I know Christian women
and Christian organisations who are fighting for the right of self determination of Indian Occupied Kashmir. They are raising their voice against rape of Kashmiri women and killings of innnocent Kashmiri's in Indian occupied Kashmir.

I cannot grasp that as a Muslim u ignore the issue of Kashmir. Even as non-Muslim you should raise your voice wherever there is injustice and human rights violation. Can i ask you why you never mention or raise the issue of Kashmir ?? Just curious!!!

I am not talking here about Pakistan we know what is happening in Pakistan but i specificly ask you about India since its your country.

Re: Solution to problems in South East Asia

^
HH - I see something in your above post that tells me your questions are genuinely felt rather than the India baiting hatred based questions I see from a number of others; hopefully my instinct is well placed.

On Kashmir all I can say is that you don't understand. Most Indians, regardless of religious affiliations, believe that the Indian government and the military should have handled Kashmir very differently. However we think most of the blame for atrocity committed against civilians lie with cross border terrorists either directly or indirectly. 'Directly' means when a terrorist comes across teh border and attacks civilians or police or military. 'Indirectly' means when our police or military is put in a situation where they are unable to distinguish between citizen and foe. The police and military have suffered so much for so long (including attacks on their respective families in their quarters) that many of them go berserk and next next thing you know, you end up with brutality. In other words we think Indian government has been ineffective in dealing with Pakistan in this respect.

Now, I am not anywhere near Kashmir - obviously somebody from there or having family there will I am sure feel differenly. But I am just telling you what people from where my near and dear live and work, feel about the Kashmir issue you brought up. It is up to you to believe or reject it, but you have to feel and know India to really understand how Indian Muslims or Christians or Sikhs or Hindus or Jains or Jews or atheists have a clear separation between feelings for the country and their faith - they by far do not encounter and allow conflicting emotions between the two. Most importantly (according to me) there is a healthy distrust amongst the educated, of so called 'holy people' in all majore religious (probably because there have been so many frauds!).

Communal conflicts occur sometimes and some of them get out of hand. But in each case the knowledgeable person knows it was politics that made the 'conflict' into 'violent conflict' - not real religious hegemony.

Where we live (even though I am settled abroad, very close relatives and family live in various parts of India), I can tell you this: the mainstream of people have no time or energy to care about the religion of the next person they are dealing with. At least in cities that is the case. I have spent time in Faridabad/Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai and a little bit Kolkota - I can say the above in most parts true. People just don't care what religion the next guy is.

While studying I had classmates and friend with ni idea, other than by name, about religion. I had have Muslim clasmates I did not like and and Muslim, Hindu and Christian friends that would have given their right hand for me (and vice versa) - it had nothing to do with religion; simply that the 'gangs' (not in the nasty American sense of gangs - I mean gang of firends hanging out and having mostly decent fun) you hung out with.

When I read messages in this board from people like Marasi, mo239 etc I simply cannot fathom where these guys are getting such impotent hatred from. I know people from Karachi - they are not like that at all. In fact most people I know from Pakistan share the Indian attributes I listed above (namely, they just don't care what religion or faith - they also do not have time or energy for that).

It is just when people get on a keyboard and in the anonymity of the www, I guess they start making fun and sooner or later tempers flare up and next thing you know, we are talking big words like war, atom bomb, religion etc

Re: Solution to problems in South East Asia

^^

I could not agree with you more on this one. Though I am a Christian, most of my friends are Hindu. I personally do not care about the religion of my friend. I have been abroad too for a limited period of time and have met a few Pakistanis. They too did not care about my religion. They just interacted with me as a person from the same "mulkh".
I always thought it was so with the majority of the Pakistanis. Coming here I am surprised and shocked that most of the posters attribute basic behaviours to the religion. I for one strongly believe that religion plays only a small part in my behaviour. It is the upbringing. A hindu can be as nice or as bad as a Christian. I havent heard even one of the people that I know say "He is doing that because he is a Christian/Muslim/Hindu".

All this said and done, I am not saying that there are no issues. There are issues and people are aware of the same and are consciously working to mitigate them. Hope for the best.

LMAO! Already did. UNCIP is non-binding. Thus need not be implemented.

Also two threads. Same question. You never come back to the thread:
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/pakistan-affairs/308938-miliband-s-kashmir-remarks-upset-india-7.html

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/world-affairs/350974-indian-army-deploy-prostitutes-women-battalion-held-kashmir-9.html?highlight=Kashmir

Both times you run away with your tail between your legs. :hehe:

I did not ask for your opinion if UNCIP resolutions are non-binding or not. I was asking if for a simple yes or no on … if the UNSC resolution of 1957 specifically ask for the implementation of UNCIP resolutions … i can understand your discomfort in replying to this :smiley:

As for “thread” of Miliband … well he himself hasn’t uttered a word on Kashmir after that … need i say more … Infact the press in Pakistan went to town with these comments … here is an article from Dawn linking his comments to “action” by Obama …

Miliband’s Kashmir remarks reflect Obama’s plan: report -DAWN - Top Stories; January 23, 2009

And you know very well what Obama had to say on Kashimr :smiley:

Regards the prostitute story … as i have time and again said … in discussion on this board we shoudl leave some space for people like you … to blow steam … cause you know what is going to hapepn if you are not allowed to … you might just “blow up” :smiley:

No i ask you again … do the UNSC resolution of 1957 ask for the implementation of the UNCIP resolutions … simple yes or no would do … would go from there !!!

Well i do not have the time to reply your post in detail so forgive me for that.
One think i can tell you is that your feeling after reading my posts is genuine.
I have no grudge against India nor Indian its only that i do try to show mirror to Indians
because only thing they do here is talk about Pakistan and never point one finger to their own country.

Personally I believe that people of both countries have so much in commen and they should live with each other peacefully there is no other way out.
My biggest problem with India is that everytime they are having cordial relationship and there is a bomblast in india then indain goverments breaks teh dialogue.
I do not get that, Pakistani government cannot even control what is happening in Pakistan (unfortuantly) let alone what extremists are doing in India.
Its very immature to everytime break dialogue whenever something bad happens.
India all the times blames Pakistan for any mishap happening in India whilst when Pakistan blames India (occasionally) then there is hue and cry from indian side.

lets be honest RAW is not a Salvation Army nor is ISI their main aim is to protect the country from outside forces with evil intention and both do their level best to destabilize and manipulate the climate.

cheers !!

Well if you have cared to look at the history you would have realized why Indians have concerns about Pakistan. Take the case of Kargil ....in 1999 India had agreed to discuss every dispute and was really a welcome step to improving ties .... how did Pakistan respond. Do tell me your views.

Secondly you say Pakistan cannot control the extremist going from Pakistan to India. I for one totally agree with that .... but then that is not the issue. Once they have done so what needs to be done .... action .... one that is clear and shows that you mean bussinesss. Just a few days back Lahore high court fined the government of Pakistan for not appealing against JuD and Hafeez Syed. Why is it that Pakistan government is not following up on this case? Now specificall on the case of Hafeez Syed ...... you know why he was let of by the court !!!! The propaganda is that Indians did not have enough evidence .... while as if you read the court directive ... they claim that JuD is not a banned organisation in Pakistan . While as Pakistani goverment claims to have banned JuD !!!! So what is the truth. Trust needs action from both sides ..... India began a new chapter in 1999 by the then PM going across to Pakistan.

Now let us take the question of Baluchistan ..... Indian PM said in Egypt ... ok if you have concerns let us discuss it .... he made it a point in the joint declaration. And what did Pakistan do with that .... they went to town saying a "dossier" was given to India and they have agreed to India's invovlement in Baluchistan !!! Finally after a few weeks of "kabbadi" ... Pakistan had to step down and say ... no such "dossier" existed !!!!!!

Re: Solution to problems in South East Asia

And a third thread. 8 weeks later still no answer to my question. And for your question.

If a UNSC resolution requires UNCIP resolutions to be implemented show me the paragraph. If its so obvious, you should have the paragraph available. Show it to me.

Maybe someone here will help you to decipher the simple english language which you have not been to READ for last 8 weeks :D

  1. Requests the United Nations Representative for India and Pakistan to make any recommendations to the parties for further appropriate action with a view to making progress towards the implementation of the resolutions of the U.N.C.I.P of 13 August 1948 and 5 January and towards a peaceful settlement ;

so lets put it under the carpet right? isnt it like "oh well you did not come to dentist for so long why now?"

No one is asking for brushing it under the carpet ..... but you cannot have talks on one side and plan attacks on the other side.

Indian PM went to Pakistan with an open mind to talk .... what was the response .... he was gifted Kargil !!!!!!

Even now .... talks had been going on .... till last year.

But there are groups within Pakistan who have survived for last 20 years on Kashmir .... now they suddenly see this coming to an end so they had to take matter into their hand so India was presented with 26/11.

For years I have been told that NOT PROBLEM can be solved without addressing the ROOT CAUSE which India was (and is) not willing to solve from last 60 years.

You can keep cutting the branches to get rid of the tree but unless you take the root out, there is no way you can get rid of the tree. What India is saying that we will not take out the root of the tree but its pakistan's duty to not allow branches to grow.

First and very minor and mandatory step towards solving a problem is that you acknowledge that problem exists and India is not even willing to do that let alone solving it. So much for atoot ang for 60 years!

And 8 weeks later. Same question. Please show me where it states that the Nations of India and Pakistan must do so.

You see the problem is that the paragraphs speaks of the United Nations Representative and not the Nation states.

And only the Nation states can implement any resolution.

In other words you can't read and you are simply posting this because you know you are wrong. You have no come back and instead of accepting you are wrong you are merely posting the same stuff which I have proven is incorrect.