Sheer hypocrisy of Netherlands!

Yes they were in poor state: i.e. they were in desparate need for immigrants to do the uneducated work, which no gora wanted to do.

Re: Sheer hypocrisy of Netherlands!

^ It’s okay DP, what do we know. It’s not like we’ve learnt all this crap already at primary school, taught by Dutch teachers at Dutch schools. :rolleyes: And it’s not like we friggin LIVE in Holland. What do WE know! :phati:

And you learned in DUTCH PRIMARY school (and never went any higher) from DUTCH teachers that
**
DUTCH were poor poor poor pooor [perhaps like Bangla Desh] before immigrants showed up? (as per your post #49).

Then suddenly all the "horse power" of immigrants propelled Holland into space? and they became richie rich, and

they got so much money that they started drawing cartoons about Arabs,

And Arabs twisted them KARTOONS and sent them back to jannat Mulak of Lebanon and Palestine,

And all Arabs got mad as hell

Then Pakistanis got mad as hell

Then Pakistanis suicide bombed Dutch embassy

And them immigrants who studied primary school, started mocking and making KARTOONS of poor jews (only immigrants are rich in holland)

And then pooor poooor pooooooooor dutch government threw the ARABs and their KARTOON supporters in jail.

And that as they say was the sheer hypocrisy of DUTCH and thus the subject of this discussion.

**
Looks like very good primary school story in DUTCHland taught by DUTCH teachers.

BERY BERY GOOD.

Because the question is not relevant. You miss the point. The attack isnt on Jews, its on Laws thats say denying the Holocaust is a capital offense. The Holocaust could have involved ginger kids, and it wouldnt have a made a difference. The issue is free speech, however repugnant, not Jews per say.

The relevant question is, why is it ok to offend Muslims, but not ok to deny the holocaust and offend Jews among others?

Im not for offending anyone. But free speech shouldnt discriminate. Everyone is an open target when it comes to free speech in a free society.

So you are talking about legislative process. Correct?

YOu want to change laws that don't sit well with your vision. If that is so, then learn the MODERN process of legislation. It is done in the parliament house and not on the dunda-maar quom's street protests and death and suicide bombings.

Learn the civilized ways and use them to change laws. And not rely on the ways of primitive uncouth tribals.

There are limits as per the legislation. FREEDOM is not absolute.

For example, a person doesn't have free speech protection if he starts shouting fire in a movie theater filled with people.

The police will beat the cr@p out of him and then put him in jail. No matter how hard he cries mama or free speech or both.

ah the blinded defenders. so they can make laws so that 'Nazi ideology' (which was anti-Jews) doesn't come back, but retards can allow hatred for others because it is against Muslims.

Let me know when Muslim countries claim to be 'freedom of speech for all', 'champion of this and that' then you can come here and rub it, till then shove it.

They don't bother, looks like you know every bit about Muslims right? or is your head buried where sun don't shine?

You do know you’re making a fool out of yourself don’t you? :rolleyes:

Country's law prohibit the denial of holocaust...If muslims have a problem with it they can take it to the court(which they have in case of wilders)..But since muslims themselves(atleast in pakistan) are so good at cooking theories on people who kill their own civilians no wonder no one is moved on theories on holocaust..

Muslim countries prohibit n things and claim to be exp(n,n) things...Anyone wanting to go against the prohibited is asked to find a place in the free world or silenced. So is the situation in netherlands..few hundred dollars of plane ticket is all that is needed..

^ So when do you need your ticket? Abhi chahiye tau will send right away.

Socha baar baar ‘ticket ticket’ lagayee rakhi hai,
let me help a hand.

:k:

KyuN deewar meiN taang takranay ki koshish kartay haiN?

Once Burqa, a spot on analysis.

I can't why the Arabs went for holocost denial. Why satirise a million other things. And it wasn't the Isrealis that published the cartoons, so why abuse them . Unfortunately, with in the large immigrant North African community, there many anti-semites.

Well using red fonts will not make the nonsense (with all due respect) you are uttering here become the truth :).

Do you really know what you are saying? Did you read back what you have said? :D
Really its always a joy to read your comments because it makes my day.
You could be very successful stand up comedian mate :)

Thank you.

If a non-Jewish DUTCH KARTOONIST makes a KARTOON about an arab,

only a doofas would take it seriously, let alone associate the KARTOON with our Prophet pbuh. In Arabistan, it is customary to call some one ya-Mohammad if you don't know his name. By calling someone Mohammad, you DO NOT make him prophet. Otherwise we'll have millions of prophets in the form of all those people who have the name Mohammad.

and then

only a maha-doofas would take the anger out on Jews who had nothing to do with this KARTOON in the first place.

But then sadly, some Paks have decided to make KARTOONS as their main issue in the life.

No one is moved? You must be God, are you? Now read other postings, if a country can make law to defend one minority then why do they allow insulting of other minorities... oh wait, they are Muslims.

Atleast Muslim countries didn't invite immigrants in name of false freedom.

This is incorrect. How can you forget about people of many sections of Pakistan? Will you call them free when more muslims are killed in Pakistan which is supposed to be a muslim country when compared secular countries such as India or the USA or most European countries?

One thing has become increasingly certain. Actually make that two:

1) there is no freedom or safety for people, whether muslim or not, in muslim countries
2) it is more dangerous to be muslims in muslim countries than in non-msuslim countries.

agree?

Completely disagree, you are only looking at Glasses 2001 when the world has gone thru many many changes. How insecure were people in 'muslim' countries say 20-30 years ago? You have to take into account how foreign forces have played/manipulated the geopolitics in the region/muslim world.

Re: Sheer hypocrisy of Netherlands!

that's true that foreign manipulation in region. but that's been going on for a 1000 years, not 20 30. the moghuls the french the english portugese all forigners, right?

the widespread use of terrorism in the name of mujahideen is not manipulation?

whereas, muslims enjoy better rights outside of so called muslim countries

That 1000 years of 'manipulation' you are talking about is not really 'manipulations', those were open/all-out wars. Last few decades we are seeing 'proxy-wars', in proxy war there is no clear enemy, no clear battle-ground, its the common public that suffers more than the actual armies. In those wars there was clear out-come after some days/weeks of fighting and country/region would go back to normal life afterwards.

As for spreading terrorism in name of 'mujahideen', why don't you ask Mr Perfect Democracy about the definition?

Re: Sheer hypocrisy of Netherlands!

ofcourse they were manipulations. the English were given a trading post and the right tp fortify it and that's how it started. Mongolian, Moghul and Arabic visitors and tradesmen were welcomed and given preferential hospitaility and that's how those things started.

And in all cases not just armies but common people suffered. For example, a large number became or were converted to islam as a result of those wars and subsequent occupation (but for that there wont be a Pakistan or the muslim population of some 150+ million in India). If the US occupies Pakistan and converts a large percentage of Pakistanis to Christianity or Judiasm, would you consider that sufferings or not?

I know it is bitter pill and you'd like to think you're victims of the west but not victims of arabs and moghuls but facts say otherwise.

Re: Sheer hypocrisy of Netherlands!

^ Seriously what is your problem? You think India will have the culture it boasts of had it not been for the Moghuls??

And on what basis are you saying that people were converted based on these wars? Please stop reading pathetic books promoting propaganda with absolutely no facts or an accurate account of history. Muslims were first known to be in India back in the 7th Century when the Arab traders came! You know it was Muslims who brought culture, decency, art and music to India. I am sorry but we're not going to apologize for the fact that we had amazing leaders like Muhammad bin Qasim etc and subsequently the Moghul emperors who ruled India and were able to introduce some very vital components of culture and art.

Islam has done a lot more for India than it has ever done for Pakistan. So pls cut the crap and stop justifying WHY Pakistan was every formed...Pakistan was formed for a multitude of reasons but certainly NOT because we 'forced people to become Muslims who were our slaves who then fought for us"

If anything, it's YOU who is exhibiting the victim mentality!