Re: SC orders Qadri to submit details of Canadian nationality
This was pointed out by all lawyers that the petition was itself without any legal point . It was very necessary to establishment of loss to the petitioner but it was not narrated by petitioner , Election is not an issue for any dual national so it it was without merit .
Have you done PhD in writing crap?
Why election is not an issue for dual National?
I personally have millions invested in Pakistan, have house and plots in Pakistan, and I am giving taxes on those investment several hundred thousand rupees every year, much more than most corrupts who get elected to parliament give (even though they are richer than me). These corrupt in power when loot, plunder, do nepotism, mismanage country, and destroy Pakistan, they are looting me too, effecting my well being too, and destroying my country too.
Anyhow, let see what you wrote and what corrupt Iftikhar and his team of corrupt judges did:
When you are quoting lawyers who on media justifying SC, You are talking about Lawyers who are towing the line of Supreme Court without merit. I bet if Supreme Court judges would interpret constitution that all lawyers should massage back-side bottom of Iftikhar Chaudhary then they would do that and would justify that too.
Fact is that, crooks in supreme court did not even heard the case and were just lingering around TUQ dual nationality, his loyalty due to Canadian oath, and throughout pretending to suspect TUQ agenda (just to justify their own haddi they get from their master), when TUQ had no agenda other than application of Pakistani Constitution in selection of election commission … that should be agenda of all Pakistanis who are not corrupt or are not on payroll of ruling thugs in provinces.
Now coming to ‘loss to the petitioner’ than that is obvious too (and it is same loss that all Pakistanis, other than corrupts and people living on thrown bones from corrupts, would suffer). That is:
1: Petitioner (TUQ) was ‘voter’ and being voter, he should be confident that the candidate contesting election in constituency he would vote, would be eligible to contest election or not (according to Pakistani constitution), and for that he as petitioner wanted an election commission that should be neutral to investigate candidates according to Pakistani constitution whoever wants to contest election.
2: Petitioner (TUQ) being a Pakistani, it is his loss (and loss of all Pakistanis) that candidates anywhere in Pakistan should be allowed to contest election even when they do not qualify to contest (according to Pakistani constitution), as these ineligible and corrupt candidates, if they contest election and win (by hook or crook), then they would make laws that would affect all Pakistanis and would loot, mismanage, and plunder Pakistan that would harm all Pakistanis (including petitioner).
So, there are two valid losses to the petitioner (and also to all decent Pakistani voters), thus TUQ was right in asking court to interfere … as present corrupt politicians in provinces have managed to get appointed ‘biased and impartial people in election commission’ without going through proper constitutional requirements, so that these corrupt politicians can get allowed to contest election without proper investigation and win election by hook or crook.
Only corrupts in Pakistan and corrupt officials on payroll of corrupt politicians would do everything to let bias election commission continue so that they can 'safeguard corrupt politicians' when contesting election. And that is what SC judges did, used every irrelevant reasons (like questioning petitioner loyalty and B-Sh*ing about TUQ nationality, oath, and agenda) to make petitioner quite regarding continuation of bias and partial election commission, and later to cover their own obvious collusion with corrupts start given excuses that TUQ was not clear about his motives.