Re: SC orders Qadri to submit details of Canadian nationality
Altough i do not visit nor post here any more, but i knew that the mods of this forum out of there love to pti would be talking against the decision using dual nationals as there sheild...and rightly so, this has been the case...
Anyway this what happend Dr. Tahirul Qadri petition was NOT rejected on the point of DUAL nationality. Hussain Farooqui? This thread opened by you has manufacturing defect.
For admittance of his petition directly in the SC, the Doctor sahib filed the same under article 184 (3)b which attracts matter of public Interest and basic human rights.
In the arguments Dr. Saheb started arguments under article 199, which calls the question of procedural defects in the formation of independent and unbiased institution like Election Commission (for which the legal Court for adjudication is High court (and that is what was told to him by the Hon'ble Court during the course of hearing).
Dr. Saheb was repeatedly asked to explain what his or Pakistani nationa as a whole, their fundamental rights were affected by the formation of EC, for which Dr. Saheb used his speaking power at his best but could not address the question put forth.
Neither in the short orders nor in the detailed one there is mention of his Dual nationality as basis of rejection of his petition. For maintainibility of petition in SC under article 184 the petitioner has to prove a) Public interest b) human rights violation and most importantly c) his bona fide intention. Dr. saheb could not satisfy the court on all these basic requirement.
If, at all, there is a fall out and dent in PTI election program of which I am not aware of, sorry this happened. But that does not mean one starts coloring wrongly the judgment to injure the feelings of expatriats and dual nationals that are as Pakistanis as we in Pakistan are.
Thanks to my friends on other forum for above point
If you think that CJ is doing what he is doing because he is a constitutional constructionist, you couldn't be more wrong. I can give you half of dozens examples of where he is just being a bully who is abusing power of court & contempt laws to jail anyone who questions his idiotic decisions.
Btw, keep in mind that he is the same guy who took oak from the military dictator and gave them power to amend the Constitution as they pleased.