Re: QUESTIONS TO A SHIA
^ i not only quoted from Naubakhti..
but also from """""Rigal Kashi""""""" ...which you people call "Shaik-us-Soodooq" ..maens the leader of true people....
most of shia scolars consider Rigal Kashi as great...true..true-faith...and religiously committed to shia-sm....and consider its books...Rigal Kashi as the most important...oldest...and authority on the "Ilm -e-Kalam" ...te full name of book is "Marafatul Naqaleen Anil Aimmaa tus Sadiqeen"......
his full name was Abu Amr bin Abdul Aziz alkashi ....he was in fourth century ....and all shia scholars belive that his house was the centre of shiaism at that time....
Similarly this is also given in the book "Tanqehuul Miqaal"
written by .... Mamaqaqni
status...great shia historian and muhaddis
volume: 2
pg. 184
printed in tehran
i also quoted from the book Rozat-us-Safa ....
vol. 2
pg.292
persian
printed in tehran
"""""""""' May Allah curse all who blame us for nothing.....when i heard of Ibne Saba...i start trmbling with fear ...he attributed many wrong things towards ali(ra)....howver ..ali(ra) was just the great companion of prophet(pbuh) and ...and whatever his sattus is due to obedience of allah and hhis Rasool(pbuh) ........""""
Imam Zain-ul-Abideen (son of hussain(ra)
Rigal Kashi (Shiek-us-Sadooq)
pg. 100
""""Many false things are dedicated towards our family....Musailma Kazzab raised the flag of prophethood after muhammad(pbuh) death...similarly Ibne Saba attributed many holy things to ali(ra) and which ali(ra) never claimed...."""""
Imam Jaffar Sadiq(6 Imam)
Rigal Kashi
pg.101
and in previous page...khanbabax has given you another book in arabic printed in iran with full scan pages of title and iner page about Ibne Saba....
these are all proofs of the shia great scholars which according to Khoemieni....
our fuqhas and ayatullahs...neither sleep...nor get tired...and you cannot even expect the least minute false from them.....
1.Rigal Kashi
2.Tanqewhul Miqaal
3.Rozat-us-safa
4.Naubakhti
5.Anwar Nuumania
6.Bihaar-ul-Anwaar
thes are shia books...if Naubakhti is wrong...rest all are also wrong...i have also given the status of Rigal Kashi above in shia scholars....
regarding suuni and western great historians...they are 100 %^% agreed upon that Ibne Saba is the founder of Shiaism to divide muslims...and in some previous posts...i have given some glimpses of Judaism in past 3000 years....
so accept it or not,...its upon you.....
"""""""" La Kum Dennu Kum Wali Yadeen"""""""""
and bye
allah-hafiz
rub rakha
from me and my dear friends who contributed more than me ......
end.
AOA Brother
I think u missed my point.
Until and unless some thing is in quran (repeat ONLY QURAN), every thing else is questionable and open for u as wellas me and all others in SHIA school of thought, so whome ever writes and what ever he writes can be objected, questioned and debated upon in the light of quran.
If hadith is open for debat in the sense to be compared with quran, transmitters, and so on then who is nobhakhti, sadooq or some one else.
Once again simple statment:
NOTHING IS SAHIH ( LIKE SAHIH BUKHARI, MUSLIM and so on) IN SHIA SCHOOL OF THOUGHT, SO IF SOME THING IS WRONG ( IF PROVED WRONG, SOME TIMES ONLY LOOK WRONG) THEN WE ARE READY TO CONDEMN IT( WHOM EVER WRITES/SAYS IT).
u (every body) r well come to ask any thing but for learning and understanding.
to give u idea, I HAVE BEEB THRU THE BOOKS OF HINDU, SIKH, JENISM, TAUSIM, CONFUSIM, BEHAIISM, BRELWIISM, DEOBANDISM, SHIAISM, CHRISTIANITY, JUDISM
AND ONLY THEN
I AM SHIA MUSLIM BUT WITH LOVE AND UNDERSTANDING FOR ALL.
take care
Khuda Hafiz
Khwadye pa amman
khwadye day oo bakhaah
Khwadeye da ,aal