re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
So why r a bunch of india fans harping about tendu here? I mean did the indian forums kick you out or you get special high by coming to a pak cricket site and doing this?
OK so we now clearly understand that Sachin is god for the indians. Anything else that needs to be shared here?
yes just the following:
no no.. sachin sux.. i wish he wasn't indian..
:D
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
antumal alola take it ez
BP control karle apna.
say after me .sachiiiiiin sucks.. he is selfish.. plays for records only.. he was not happy when india won.. india loses EVERYTIME ( yes everytime, we dont care what the records say, they are tampered by BCCI ) sachin scores 100...
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
..
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
Jayewardene scored a ton in the WC finals, and SL still lost. Those days are long gone when a ton ensured a victory. 2-3 players playing knocks of 50+ runs is far more valuable in ODIs than one person scoring a ton and the rest just collapsing.
Lets compare the Tendulkar and Jawardene ... who has better percentage of winning the game after hitting a ton.... Shell we ?
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low
Go ahead :k: Put some data behind your arguement.
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
Lets compare the Tendulkar and Jawardene ... who has better percentage of winning the game after hitting a ton.... Shell we ?
Let's see some numbers for the top 15-20 players in the last 20 years and see if there is some extraordinary proof againt SRT.. the onus is on you to produce these numbers..
And lets say if SL's win % after Jaya's 100 IS higher than India's win% after SRT's ton.... does this really mean that "SRT 100 = India lose" ? Does this mean SRT is selfish and plays for records?
Nope.
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low
ODI’s
Sachin’s ODI Record when he scored a 100
Total tons : 48
Won the game : 33
Lost the game : 13
Winning % = 33/48 * 100 = 68.75 %
Jayawardene’s ODI Record when he scored a 100
Total tons : 14
Won the game : 13
Lost the game : 01
Winning % = 13/14 * 100 = 92.85 %
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
ODI's
Sachin's ODI Record when he scored a 100
Total tons : 49 Won the game : 33 Lost the game : 13
Winning % = 33/49 * 100 = 67.34 %
Jayawardene's ODI Record when he scored a 100
Total tons : 14 Won the game : 13 Lost the game : 01
Winning % = 13/14 * 100 = 92.85 %
Good, now we are talking :D
MJ has scored 14 centuries in 332 ODIs i.e. 1 century in every 24 ODIs
SRT has scored 48 centuries in 453 ODIs i.e. 1 century in every 9 ODIs
Their records are not even comparable. Why don't you get a batsman whose record is more comparable to Sachin's ? Or better still, look at the top 10 ODI centurymakers of all time and lets see how Sachin stacks up against them.
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
Let's see some numbers for the top 15-20 players in the last 20 years and see if there is some extraordinary proof againt SRT.. the onus is on you to produce these numbers..
And lets say if SL's win % after Jaya's 100 IS higher than India's win% after SRT's ton.... does this really mean that "SRT 100 = India lose" ? Does this mean SRT is selfish and plays for records?
Nope.
Tendulkar is probably only indian i like (take my frnds and relatives out). I have nuthing against him.....He is the best batsman in today's cricket .... If tendulkar scores a ton and india loses doesnt mean its tendulkars fault, its just that Indian bowling hasnt been very consistent in defending decent totals. Its just his luck that he didnt get strong bowling line to support his outclass batting.
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
Good, now we are talking :D
MJ has scored 14 centuries in 332 ODIs i.e. 1 century in every 24 ODIs SRT has scored 48 centuries in 453 ODIs i.e. 1 century in every 9 ODIs
Their records are not even comparable. Why don't you get a batsman whose record is more comparable to Sachin's ? Or better still, look at the top 10 ODI centurymakers of all time and lets see how Sachin stacks up against them.
Hi............ i never said Jayawardene is better batsman than Sachin, On the other hand y dont you pick a batsman ?
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low
Ok, lets start with these 5 -
Sachin Tendulkar](Sachin Tendulkar - Wikipedia)
Ricky Ponting](Ricky Ponting - Wikipedia)
Sanath Jayasuriya](Sanath Jayasuriya - Wikipedia)
Sourav Ganguly](Sourav Ganguly - Wikipedia)
Herschelle Gibbs](Herschelle Gibbs - Wikipedia)
Glad you get that 
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
Sachin Tendulkar= 33/48 = 68.75 %
Sir Viv Richards = 11/11 = 100 %
Saeed Anwar 16/20 = 80 %
Ricky Ponting = 25/30 = 83.33 %
Sanath Jaysuria = 24/28 = 85.71 %
Hershelle Gibbs = 15/21 = 71.4 %
Sourav Ganguly =18/22 = 81.81 %
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
Ok, lets start with these 5 -
Glad you get that ;)
I will be glad if u admitted he does have little bad luck charm when he scores Hundreds.... Coz i think his 90's has better percentage of winning the game than his 100's.
Nope am wrong
Sachin has 18 nervous 90's .... Indian won 11 and lost 7 .... 11/18 = 61.11 %
If India had better bowling he wud have won atleast 3 World cups in his career.
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons’ winning %age comparatively low
I agree with all of the facts that you have listed 
However, all that proves is that the games where Sachin made a century and India lost were either due to bad bowling or no support from the other batsmen. To extend that arguement further, it does not prove that Sachin plays only for records (as his critics claim). What it does prove is that Sachin gives his best even in losing causes. And thats the greatness of the player :k:
And at the end of the day - 69% winning record when he scores a century is not that bad, especially when you combine it with the fact that he has scored a century every 9 games (on average).
P.S. Thanks for keeping the dicsussion healthy and objective :k:
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
I will be glad if u admitted he does have little bad luck charm when he scores Hundreds.... Coz i think his 90's has better percentage of winning the game than his 100's.
Nope am wrong
Sachin has 18 nervous 90's .... Indian won 11 and lost 7 .... 11/18 = 61.11 %
If India had better bowling he wud have won atleast 3 World cups in his career.
this is was what i expected.some of them where making fun of him
also saching go out on 99 around 5-6 times :P
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
What about Inzamam;s percentage i think its better than Tendulkar too
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
Sachin Tendulkar= 33/48 = 68.75 % Sir Viv Richards = 11/11 = 100 % Saeed Anwar 16/20 = 80 % Ricky Ponting = 25/30 = 83.33 % Sanath Jaysuria = 24/28 = 85.71 % Hershelle Gibbs = 15/21 = 71.4 % Sourav Ganguly =18/22 = 81.81 %
U simply nailed it :D
re: Player: Sachin tons win games; Pakilarka: Sachin tons' winning %age comparatively low
the most important point here is the one made by both paki larka and player... the % is lower than others due lack of support from other indian batters or the indian bowling..
the statement " srt 100 = india lose " is still illogical.. since its true only ~31% of the time..