Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

Yesterday India media was getting fits on this report by US think tank that Pak will have 200 nucleur devices by year 2020. I honestly dont think its a lot as we are talking about 6 years ahead. I’m sure by then India will have thousands of it.

Pakistan has world’s fastest growing nuclear programme: US think tank - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

Pakistan has world’s fastest growing nuclear programme: US think tank

**Sajjad Haider
Updated 28 minutes ago

[TABLE=“class: media one-whole palm–one-whole, width: 650”]

Report says that by 2020, Pakistan could have a fissile material stockpile sufficient to produce more than 200 nuclear weapons - Photo: ISPR

Pakistan has the world’s fastest growing nuclear programme capable of weaponising up to 200 nuclear devices by the year 2020, a US-based think tank says in a recently released report.
“Pakistan…is believed to have enough fissile material to produce between 110 and 120 nuclear warheads,” says the report *Strategic Stability in the Second Nuclear Age Council*released by the influential Council on Foreign Relations.
“By 2020, Pakistan could have a fissile material stockpile sufficient to produce more than 200 nuclear weapons.”
``
The CFR notes that Asia is witnessing a nuclear buildup, despite the fact that nuclear arsenals are shrinking in the rest of the world.
The buildup comes as part of an ongoing nuclear and missile arms race between Pakistan and neighbouring India since 1998 “that shows no signs of abating,” says the report.
“The size and composition of Pakistan’s nuclear forces appear increasingly dictated by India’s growing conventional military capabilities.”

**

Severe security challenges for South Asia

**According to the report, India – perceived to be the primary military threat to Pakistan – is also expanding its fissile material production capacity, and is estimated to possess enough fissile material for between 90 and 110 nuclear weapons.
The buildup poses more severe security challenges to the two neighbouring nuclear countries than others due to their history of conflict, domestic instability and cross-border terrorism.
“The next crisis between India and Pakistan could be sparked by a cross-border military incursion, a mass-casualty terrorist attack or a high-profile assassination.
“The security trilemma increases the vulnerability of regional stability to disruptions by outside forces and increases the likelihood that a breakdown in strategic stability between India and Pakistan could threaten other nuclear weapon states,” says the report.

**

Pakistan ‘concerned’ about possible US unilateral action

**Apart from the predominant threat posed by India, the CFR said Pakistan is also reportedly “concerned by the potential for the United States to launch a military operation to seize or disarm Pakistani nuclear weapons”.
It said concern was partly based on the US military’s reported contingency planning to “prevent Pakistani nuclear weapons from falling into the hands of terrorists”, and heightened by unilateral 2011 US forces raid in Abbottabad that killed Osama bin Laden.
Speaking to Dawn.com on condition of anonymity, a Pakistani military official said the report was “not incorrect”.
However, he said that some statements in the report were mere assumptions, citing the portion stating that Pakistan could lose command and control of its arsenal.
“It’s a hypothesis, as such it is a very basic report. It is not an incorrect report. They are talking about possibilities, like the possible escalation of tension between India and Pakistan. These things are taken into account by authorities,” he said.

**

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

Its not about 200 or 210 but its the matter of deciding that critical number that is ENOUGH for us. There is no point piling on weapons after that number.

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

OMG make a water treatment plant!!!!!!
People are getting sick and stuff.

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

Here is the extract of this special report related to Pakistan:

Strategic Stability in the Second Nuclear Age

Author: Gregory D. Koblentz, Associate Professor, School of Policy, Government, and International Affairs, and Deputy Director, Biodefense Graduate Program, George Mason University

http://i.cfr.org/content/publications/images/CSR71_lrg.jpg

Download the Full Report
PublisherCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Release DateNovember 2014
65 pages
ISBN 978-0-87609-611-6
Council Special Report No. 71

Overview

Since the end of the Cold War, a new nuclear order has emerged, shaped by rising nuclear states and military technologies that threaten stability, writes George Mason University’s Gregory Koblentz in a new Council Special Report.
During the Cold War, the potential for nuclear weapons to be used was determined largely by the United States and the Soviet Union. Now, with 16,300 weapons possessed by the seven established nuclear-armed states—China, France, India, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States—deterrence is increasingly complex. Since most of these countries face threats from a number of potential adversaries, “changes in one state’s nuclear policy can have a cascading effect on the other states.”
Though many states are downsizing their stockpiles, Asia is witnessing a buildup; Pakistan has the fastest-growing nuclear program in the world. By 2020, it could have a stockpile of fissile material that, if weaponized, could produce as many as two hundred nuclear devices. The author identifies South Asia as the region “most at risk of a breakdown in strategic stability due to an explosive mixture of unresolved territorial disputes, cross-border terrorism, and growing nuclear arsenals.”
Emerging technologies such as missile defenses, cyber and antisatellite weapons, and conventional precision strike weapons pose additional risks, Koblentz warns, and could potentially spur arms races and trigger crises.
“The United States has more to lose from a breakdown in strategic stability than any other country due to its position as a global leader, the interdependence of its economy, and the network of security commitments it has around the world,” he asserts. The United States and Russia still possess more than 90 percent of the world’s nuclear weapons. Despite the increasing chill in U.S.-Russia relations, Washington’s highest priority should be to maintain strategic efforts with Russia and China, the two states with the capability and potential intent to launch a nuclear attack on the American homeland.
The United States should work with other nuclear states to address sources of instability in the near term and establish processes for multilateral arms control efforts over the longer term, writes Koblentz. He urges the Obama administration to

  • enhance initiatives that foster transparency, confidence-building, and restraint to mitigate the risk that emerging technologies will trigger arms races, threaten the survivability of nuclear forces, or undermine early warning and nuclear command and control systems;
  • deepen bilateral and multilateral dialogues with the other nuclear-armed states; and
  • create a forum for the seven established nuclear-armed states to discuss further steps to reduce the risk of deliberate, accidental, or unauthorized use of nuclear weapons.

[HR][/HR]*Professors: To request an exam copy, contact Ashley Bregman at [EMAIL=“%[email protected]”][email protected]. Please include your university and course name

Gregory Koblentz: Strategic Stability in the Second Nuclear Age - Council on Foreign Relations*

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

it's NOT in the number of nuclear warheads but rather in the decision to carelessly use it and to what will happen afterwards.

sab ko hosh ke naaKhun lene chaahiyeN aur iske iste'maal kaa sochnaa bhii tabaahii hai.

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

Report from 'US Think Tank". The only country that HAS (according to some war historians, needlessly,) used nuclear weapons

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

yes but according to a Pakistani analyst, the war would have NOT ended and would have cost a large number of human lives if the nuclear bomb wasn't used which brought the war to a sudden stop. however, having said that, i don't think it was morally right to cause so much damage to the humanity.

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

Its like building a house with a promise to never live in it even if you are on roads.

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020


EXACTLY...like Zardari is doing...he has so much wealth but due to health reason he can NOT eat more than a small quantity of daal and saag. gunaah be-lazzat!

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

Is there an advantage of throwing nuke on same place one right after the other? In that case 200 makes sense. Otherwise, can we drop a few nukes one poverty, polio, illiteracy, corruption and lack of justice too?

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

Countries have policies in place to use nuclear weapons and I am sure Pakistan has one in place too. There is no point in keep on getting a beating from someone who is many folds bigger and powerful than you and keep nuclear arsenal "secure". There always is a point where country should decide its a show time.

Think of it as a street fight between 300lb fighter and 150lb regular man with a weapon on him. He wont just lay down there and let the WWF guy break every single bone of his body just because he might have to go on trial if he uses that weapon.

Key is to just decide on the critical number that "enough" for us and stop spending much on these expensive weapons and rather put the money towards right cause.

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

Sounds like a drumbeat to me. Once Iran's account is settled, its Pakistan's turn. India will have far more of them yet just a passing mention of it. I think Pakistan should double-down and build 3 times that for negotiation if not for deterrence.

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020


and also the key is to opt for peace talks and let peace take hold in the subcontinent. i think talks are the best strategy for both India and Pakistan. both as poor countries need to spend the money somewhere else where it's most needed.

Re: Pakistan will have 200 nucleur weapons by year 2020

There are significant number of historians who believe that It was more of a demonstration of US power and testing their newly developed bombs than forcing a Japanese surrender.

United States Strategic Bombing Survey: Summary Report (Pacific War)

…Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey’s opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated…

=========

Also, more recently, Racing the Enemy: Stalin, Truman, and the Surrender of Japan: Hasegawa, Tsuyoshi: 9780674022416: Amazon.com: Books [You can read comments for summary of Hasegawa’s arguments]