Nestle Grape juice ?

What i want to know is that can you make wine from Nestle Grape juice ? i mean are the vids on youtube or somethin. ?

Re: Nestle Grape juic ?

^ dude you need the recipe/formula or what?

Hahahahaha. Now that's desperation! Why would you wanna do that?

Re: Nestle Grape juic ?

Perhaps he is desperate to make red wine vinegar. Of course. He will brew some alcohol from grape juice, leave it exposed for a while and end up with a nice red wine vinegar to add to his salad dressings.

Re: Nestle Grape juic ?

Guys i all wanted was a simple answere in yes or no , no formula ,recipe and definately no vinegar , surely u can do better than that .

Re: Nestle Grape juice ?

I would assume one can make wine from plain ol grapes too...just sarhe howe:D

Re: Nestle Grape juice ?

Its a lot easier to buy wine off the shelf and a better quality too.

Re: Nestle Grape juice ?

Yes easy to buy and drink and hard to face the consequences of it.

Re: Nestle Grape juice ?

^What consequences are you referening to?

Re: Nestle Grape juice ?

^health issues, getting drunk in public etc etc.

Re: Nestle Grape juice ?

Excess of evrything is bad. Its a fact. Moderation is the key to good health and your position in the eyes of the public. etc etc

I agree but majority don't believe in "excess of everything is bad" phrase. At least the stats show this, you know the deaths, accidents, injuries, diseases etc etc.

Re: Nestle Grape juice ?

Deaths - Smoking should be banned before alcohol as it is the biggest killer in the current times, on a second thought religion as well.

Accident - are not caused by alcohol but by the idiots who drive after drinking alcohol. take away the license on the very first offence. Even life imprisonment for attempted murder.

Injuries - ?

Diseases - Then oil, salt, butter, coffee, sugar, tea all should be removed from the shelves.

Re: Nestle Grape juice ?

Nestle Grape Juice is tasty itself :cheegum:

Re: Nestle Grape juice ?

Just Google "make wine from grape juice"... i'm sure your answer will appear.

Yes Smoking should be banned along with alcohol. Most wars, violence and deaths occurred in Secular age so don't know why do you want to ban religion, besides religion is quite a personal thing and it doesn't harm the religious person or others.

Yes accidents and fights are not caused by alcohol but by the ones who drink it.

A lot of people involved in accidents and fights cost millions of pounds to Governments.

The dangers of consuming oil, salt, butter, coffee, sugar and tea are much more less than of the alcohol. Please check the data of alcohol related deaths.


So you mean to say that I can go to Peshawar and open a video shop without any hassle. Cool.

Lady! I agree that religion is a personal thing but since beginning the followers have not acted so. In every age there was voilence in the name of religion. Always happened and always will. You can tell religion is a personal thing to the woman who got whipped on her behind by Talibans. You may also want to tell that to the hundreds of women who died in Europe on the accusation of witchcraft.


Now are we saying that the people who dont drink dont cause fights or accidents. Then in that case it should be zero fights and accidents in Saudi as it is a dry country.

Again! if you put a monkey on the driving seat - things are bound to happen. The idea is to find the monkeys drunk or otherwise before the incident.


And what do we do with the people who were not even drunk and caused an accident.

Your argument is more like as people die from car accidents - lets ban the cars.

The hard fact or the harsh reality is people will drink - and it is government's responsibilty to ensure that if a monkey decides to drive the car give him the harshest penality before he injures himself or cause death of another.


The whole Middle East, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan is almost dry. 99% of the people dont drink is these areas. I wonder why there are so many heart problems.

Thats why in my earlier post I said moderation is the key. If you are not a moderate person you can die of sugar or salt.

Good day.

Yeah i guess so, they have a big pushto film industry.

I agree that there have been crimes committed in the name of religion but my point is that doesn't make religion worse than secularism because secularism has it's own dirty laundry.

My point was that the world will be a much better place to live without any drunkan.

I'm all for banning the cars but you missed the point. There are stats that show the alcohol related accidents and fights and it happen a lot and it happen when people get drunk and they get drunk often because no one really cares about "excess of everything is bad".

People dying with heart disease [that was caused by salt or sugar] are not danger to society.


With all the death threats from the so called jihadees - No thank you very much.


And I agree with you that seculars are not clean as well. If I have to chose between the two evils I would go for secularism any day.


I would rather live in a world with no mullahs. So what! if its not what we want. As its not going to happen we better learn to live with what we have.


Lets say for the sake of the argument if the cars are banned, then no drunk drivers - problem solved, whats the issue now. My question still remains 99.9% of Pakistanis are non drinking people, why are they fighting. Whatever cause they are fighting for should we ban that as well. i.e. in the name of religion.


And how a person dying of liver cirrhosis (sp?) is a danger to the society?

Would be great if that was true. I don't believe it is.