Need some information 4 Ahmedies

Peace Psyah,

So doors are closed on new prophets but not on prophethood [direct and pure communique between man and Allah] as long as Jesus (as) is alive. When he comes back, he will get direct knowledge and instructions from Allah. It means there is still need of prophethood but new prophet cannot come so an old prophet is kept alive in heavens in order to cater for the needs of later days. I am just thinking out loud.

[QUOTE]

See how he is unable to comprehend a simple urdu text that a 8th grader can understand fully. Here is what Mr. crankthatskunk displayed in his article

[/QUOTE]

Mr. KCChugtai,

There is absolutely no problem with my comprehension of Urdu text or language. I can read, write, speak, Urdu, Arabic and Persian all three languages, with the grace of Allah SWT.

I had a long discussion with one of the so called Qadianis on another forum. He never ever provided proofs for the credibility of the Mirza on other articles; like every other Qadiani, they always go quite and never attempt to defend Mirza. Says all about their “true Islam”.

But he like you thought it would be easy to talk about this article exactly like you are trying now. The result was devastating for him. You can try too, nobody is stopping you. What I write I can defend without any questions or doubts.

The cutting I produced in my article was from your authentic sources too. So if you produce same material from another book, does not mean anything at all. The material is the same with same contents.

What is your objection? Spell it out, for me to respond.

Another one of you have left two messages on this article, I saw them yesterday, I approve them to be shown on the Web log. I will respond to them in due course, Inshallah.

[QUOTE]

So doors are closed on new prophets but not on prophethood [direct and pure communique between man and Allah] as long as Jesus (as) is alive. When he comes back, he will get direct knowledge and instructions from Allah. It means there is still need of prophethood but new prophet cannot come so an old prophet is kept alive in heavens in order to cater for the needs of later days. I am just thinking out loud.

[/QUOTE]

Ok, let’s test you Mr. KCChugtai,

Tell us one simple thing please; you know when Jesus As was living in Kashmir for almost 90 years according to Mirza.

Was he As a Prophet during that period?


Was he given the Wahi at that time?


Ok, let’s assume if Jews didn’t know where he disappeared, but surely Allah SWT knew isn’t?
*Or you think even Allah SWT didn’t know either (nauzobillah)? *


*Can you provide any evidence of the continuation of the Wahi to ISA AS in these 90 years? *


*Please also tell us, according to Mirza and you Jesus As was alive in Kashmir for 90 years after 3 AD, up until 125 AD, then why there is no mention of this period of his prophet hood in the Holy Quran? *


*Did Allah SWT also forgot (nauzobillah) about his As life in Kashmir and failed to mention a single Word in the Holy Quran for this long period of life? *


*Why Allah SWT never ever decreed anything for this long life of Jesus As in Kashmir, when 3 years of his ministry from the age of 30 to 33 are mentioned in details in the Holy Quran, including his As birth and his As childhood? *


*Why Prophet SAW never uttered a word about this period of life of Jesus As when according to Quranic verse 3:61 he SAW was given the full knowledge about Isa AS by Allah SWT? *

You gave this advice to Mr. Popat that I am interested in the life in Kashmir; perhaps you can shed some light on these questions. These would have been my next sets of questions to Mr. Popat while he search for authentic hadiths which show categorical and unequivocal statements of Prophet SAW for the death of ISA As.

You can solve this mystery for us. I challenge you. Mirza is busted from every angle, I can assure you this, none of you could ever win any arguments from me on the writings of Mirza, cast iron guarantee.

wow....u can!!

I would love to hear you speaking Urdu first...Arbi or Persian to dooor ki baat hai...koi roman Urdu mien hi apna taaza kaanton bhara kalaam irshaad farmaaien.

My long unanswered question, do quadiyanis go to mecca to perform haj? I mean are they issued visa from Saudi govt. to visit for haj?

If they have Pakistani Passport then no. But here in UK a lot of AHMADIES go and perform Hajj every year. You see they are called Non Muslims in Pakistan only.

P.S - I dont know about Qadianies....I think becasue they live in India they would be going as well becasue even in India Ahmadies are called Muslims.

addition

A lot of Ahmadies out African Brothers and Sisters also visit Mecca to perform Hajja and Umra...and same thing in far east.

[QUOTE]

The cutting I produced in my article was from your authentic sources too. So if you produce same material from another book, does not mean anything at all. The material is the same with same contents.

What is your objection? Spell it out, for me to respond.

[/QUOTE]

ahh, did I say that two cuttings differ in their content? I questioned your comprehension of that passage. Your conclusion of that passage that HMGAQ (as) believed that 'earth is static' is not correct.

Ahaaa, foolish Qadianis never ever stop to amaze me. I told you, one of your cultists already had a debate with me on this article. In the end he ran away as usual. But you didn’t take my hint. I am not going to waste my time in lengthy and useless arguments but cut short the jest of his arguments and my response to his arguments.

“Mirza said Aloome-Tabai never remain the same. To cut short the arguments I decided to use the word Scientists for this word Tabai to cover all or any branch of the Science Mirza meant. Therefore, Mirza says that scientific opinion were that the heavens revolves and the earth is static, now the scientists think that earth revolves, or you can use spin instead of revolve.

Fact; no scientists ever said that Earth is static. Therefore, it is the word of Mirza not scientists. Mirza believed earth was static not Scientists.

I challenge Qadianis around the world to produce authenticated findings from any experiment done by the scientists which says that Earth is static. Any quote from any credible scientists from the history to state that Earth is static.

If you fail to provide any evidence then the implications rightly are it is the idea of Mirza that earth is static.

I hope clever Qadianis now can understand my argument. Or they have the choice to produce the evidence. Any takers?

Mr. KCChugtai, any comments for the proofs of 90 years life of Jesus AS in Kashmir from the Holy Quran?

Hey Kranky boy

here is something for you.

You said you are “modern and educated Muslim.”

Btw what is a modern muslim? new sect beside, sunni and shia?

Re: Need some information 4 Ahmedies

Just a simple question, specialy to other muslims.
What should an Ahmadi Muslim do to become 72 sects Muslim?
Any easy way without getting the KAFIR label?

Well frankly I have never come across any Ahmadi in recent years. Although when I was around 16 years one gentleman in Lucknow handed over a paper bill to me about Ahmadiyaat and told me that we are being persecuted and being declare non muslims in Pakistan.

Later just some months back when I talked to my father about Ahmadis, he told me name of an Ahmadi in our hometown, and I was surprised to know that he was quiet an influential personality of our muslim dominated town.

What I understand from ur reply is that if the prospective haji doesnt declare his Ahmadi credentials than he can go to Haj, and this is not possible in Pakistan, therefore no Ahmadi Haji in Pakistan.

Thanks.

Re: Need some information 4 Ahmedies

Well every country has their rule. In pakistan you have to declare that you are Ahmadi when you apply for Visa but not in other countries hence no persecution. You only have to tell them you are Muslim and infact when they read Muslim name of passport they dont ask question anyway.

There are conditions for Hajj to be valid as well....which can be provided if you are interested in reading.

Influentional Ahmadies..

No doubt there are a lot of them all over the world. For example the ShahNawaz Group on Pakistan....the only Mercedes dealers in Pak.

A lot of Businessmen in Western countries and Politians in African Countries...infact some Kings of African tribes as well....

but influence does not win the hearts.....there is so much hatred filled by Mullah that its not easy to take that out easily.

great video…

Wow what a masterpiece of reasoning…

If he said that 'earlier physicists [or people having knowledge of physical sciences of certain time.] thought that ‘Earth is stationary’. How does that become his own belief? What a dimwit…

He(as) was saying that
the knowledge we get from Allah is always true but this is not the case with sciences. If a certain principle/law [provided by the scientists] is accepted today, doesn’t mean that it will not change with further research. So we shouldn’t take sciences of certain era as perfect and treat them as word of Allah.
Human knowledge is limited and humans may not be able to fully understand the true science/reasoning behind everything in the universe.

and why he said that. he said:

It is not wise to reject miracles just on this basis that ‘We haven’t seen such a thing ever happening before’.

i.e.,

**It is not wise to make contemporary scientific laws or ideas as standard for understanding the nature of miracles. Humans may not fathom the actual functioning /reasoning /knowledge of all the things in nature.
**

Aristotle, Plato and most physicists[theorists or otherwise] before Copernicus believed that Earth is at the center of universe and is stationary.
Did he(as) mention laboratory experiments? You had enough of twisting turnings and deceiving . Stop it now.

Aristotle
Read this article. Aristotle did experiments/observations fit for his time to prove his point.

My ‘Sarkari’ and ‘ghair Sarkari’ muslim brothers and sisters! try reading that passage yourself and let me know what did you understand?

Here is the link
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/358335-need-some-information-4-ahmedies.html#14

Let Jesus (as) rest in peace for a while.

Crankthatskunk,

I thought the purpose of advent of AnHuzur (saw) was to spread message of Islam to whole world, which was to believe in ONE GOD, Malaika, Prophets, Books and Day of Judgment, and to do good deeds with fellow human beings. right?

But, on the other hand, you are your likes are doing exactly contrary. You are wasting your efforts in declaring a group of people as “Kaafir”, who say that they are muslim and believe in everything that Prophet Muhammad (saw) has said, including the prophecy of the advent of Imam Mehdi, and Isa Ibne Maryam in later days.

And beware before you call your muslim fellows “kaafir”:

Chapter 27: THE CONDITION OF THE FAITH OF ONE WHO CALLS HIS BROTHER MUSLIM AN UNBELIEVER Book 001, Number 0116: It is reported on the authority of Ibn 'Umar that the Apostle (may Sall Allahu alaihi wa Aalihi wa Sallim) observed: When a man calls his brother an unbeliever, it returns (at least) to one of them.

And if you say that what Ahmadies say by their tongue, don’ believe from their hearts, then read the following hadith:

Book 001, Number 0176: It is narrated on the authority of Usama b. Zaid that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent us in a raiding party. We raided Huraqat of Juhaina in the morning. I caught hold of a man and he said: There is no god but Allah, I attacked him with a spear. It once occurred to me and I talked about it to the Apostle (may peace be upon him). The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Did he profess" There is no god but Allah," and even then you killed him? I said: Messenger of Allah, he made a profession of it out of the fear of the weapon. He (the Holy Prophet) observed: Did you tear his heart in order to find out whether it had professed or not? And he went on repeating it to me till I wished I had embraced Islam that day.

Now, it is clear that there is no room for any muslim to declare any other person “Kaafir” if he says he’s muslim and reads kalima.

And have you ever pondered upon the message of Holy Quran? Find me one Ayat in which Allah says that if a claimant appears then kill him and declare him kaafir and go around the world and kill whoever believes in that prophet and waste all your life in proving that he is wrong in his claim. No where will you find such ayat. However, Allah does say that if a there appears a false claimant then Allah alone will deal with him and that he will not be allowed to prosper in this world.

On contrary, Allah says several times in His Book that when a prophet comes, believe in him. For example:

Al-Nisa’ Chapter 4 : Verse 171](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=4&verse=170)

[RIGHT]يٰۤاَيُّهَا النَّاسُ قَدْ جَآءَكُمُ الرَّسُوْلُ بِالْحَـقِّ مِنْ رَّبِّكُمْ فَاٰمِنُوْا خَيْرًا لَّـكُمْؕ وَاِنْ تَكْفُرُوْا فَاِنَّ لِلّٰهِ مَا فِى السَّمٰوٰتِ وَالْاَرْضِؕ وَكَانَ اللّٰهُ عَلِيْمًا حَكِيْمًا‏ [/RIGHT]

O mankind, the Messenger has indeed come to you with Truth from your Lord; believe therefore, it will be better for you. But if you disbelieve, verily, to Allah belongs whatever is in the heavens and in the earth. And Allah is All-Knowing, Wise.
[RIGHT][4:171] اے لوگو! تمہارے پاس تمہار ے ربّ کی طرف سے حق کے ساتھ رسول آ چکا ہے۔ پس ایمان لے آؤ (یہ) تمہارے لئے بہتر ہوگا۔ پھر بھی اگر تم انکار کرو تو یقیناً اللہ ہی کا ہے جو آسمانوں اور زمین میں ہے اور اللہ دائمی علم رکھنے والا (اور) صاحبِ حکمت ہے[/RIGHT]

And then Allah shows us what happened to the people who disobeyed and disrespected His prophets. For example:

Al-Qasas Chapter 28 : Verse 60](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=28&verse=59)

[RIGHT][28:60]وَ مَا كَانَ رَبُّكَ مُهْلِكَ الْقُرٰى حَتّٰى يَبْعَثَ فِىْۤ اُمِّهَا رَسُوْلاً يَّتْلُوْا عَلَيْهِمْ اٰيٰتِنَا*ۚ وَمَا كُنَّا مُهْلِكِىْ الْقُرٰٓى اِلَّا وَاَهْلُه ظٰلِمُوْنَ‏ [/RIGHT]

And thy Lord would never destroy the towns until He has raised in the mother *town *thereof a Messenger, reciting unto them Our Signs; nor would We destroy the towns unless the people thereof are wrongdoers.

[RIGHT][28:60] اور تیرا ربّ بستیوں کو ہلاک نہیں کرتا یہاں تک کہ ان (بستیوں) کی ماں میں رسول مبعوث کرچکا ہوتا ہے جو اُن پر ہماری آیات پڑھتا ہے۔ اور ہم اس کے سوا بستیوں کو ہلاک نہیں کرتے کہ ان کے بسنے والے ظالم ہوچکے ہوں۔[/RIGHT]

Al-Mu’min Chapter 40 : Verse 6](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=40&verse=0)

[RIGHT][40:6] كَذَّبَتْ قَبْلَهُمْ قَوْمُ نُوْحٍ وَّ الْاَحْزَابُ مِنْۢ بَعْدِهِمْ وَهَمَّتْ كُلُّ اُمَّةٍۢ بِرَسُوْلِهِمْ لِيَاْخُذُوْهُؕ وَجَادَلُوْا بِالْبَاطِلِ لِيُدْحِضُوْا بِهِ الْحَقَّ فَاَخَذْتُهُمْ فَكَيْفَ كَانَ عِقَابِ‏ [/RIGHT]

The people of Noah and other groups after them denied Our Signs before these people, and every nation strove to seize their Messenger, and disputed by means of false arguments that they might rebut the truth thereby. Then I seized them, and how* terrible *was My retribution
[RIGHT][40:6] ان سے پہلے نوح کی قوم نے بھی جھٹلایا تھا اور ان کے بعد مختلف گروہوں نے بھی اور ہر قوم نے اپنے رسول کے متعلق یہ پختہ ارادہ کیا تھا کہ وہ اسے پکڑلیں اور انہوں نے جھوٹ کے ذریعہ جھگڑا کیا تاکہ اس کے ذریعہ سے حق کو جھٹلادیں۔ تب میں نے انہیں پکڑ لیا۔ پس ( دیکھو) میری سزا کیسی تھی۔ [/RIGHT]

And then Allah says that every prophet that he has sent, has been called ‘Liar’, ‘Infidel’ and has been rejected. For example:

Al-An`am Chapter 6 : Verse 113](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=6&verse=112)

[RIGHT][6:113] وَكَذٰلِكَ جَعَلْنَا لِكُلِّ نَبِىٍّ عَدُوًّا شَيٰطِيْنَ الْاِنْسِ وَالْجِنِّ يُوْحِىْ بَعْضُهُمْ اِلٰى بَعْضٍ زُخْرُفَ الْقَوْلِ غُرُوْرًاؕ وَلَوْ شَآءَ رَبُّكَ مَا فَعَلُوْهُ فَذَرْهُمْ وَمَا يَفْتَرُوْنَ‏ [/RIGHT]
And in like manner have We made for every Prophet an enemy, evil ones from among men and Jinn. They suggest one to another gilded speech in order to deceive — and if thy Lord had *enforced *His will, they would not have done it; so leave them alone with that which they fabricate —
[RIGHT][6:113] اور اسی طرح ہم نے ہر نبی کے لئے جن و اِنس کے شیطانوں کو دشمن بنا دیا۔ ان میں سے بعض بعض کی طرف ملمّع کی ہوئی باتیں دھوکہ دیتے ہوئے وحی کرتے ہیں۔ اور اگر تیرا ربّ چاہتا تو وہ ایسا نہ کرتے۔ پس تُو ان کو چھوڑ دے اور اُسے بھی جو وہ اِفترا کرتے ہیں۔[/RIGHT]

Al-A`raf Chapter 7 : Verse 95](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=7&verse=94)

[RIGHT][7:95] وَمَاۤ اَرْسَلْنَا فِىْ قَرْيَةٍ مِّنْ نَّبِىٍّ اِلَّاۤ اَخَذْنَاۤ اَهْلَهَا بِالْبَاْسَآءِ وَالضَّرَّآءِ لَعَلَّهُمْ يَضَّرَّعُوْنَ‏ [/RIGHT]
And never did We send a Prophet to any town but We seized the people thereof with adversity and suffering, that they might become humble[7:95] اور ہم نے کسی بستی میں کوئی نبی نہیں بھیجا مگر اس کے رہنے والوں کو کبھی تنگی اور کبھی تکلیف سے پکڑلیا تاکہ وہ تضرّع
کریں۔

Al-Zukhruf Chapter 43 : Verse 8

[RIGHT][43:8] وَمَا يَاْتِيْهِمْ مِّنْ نَّبِىٍّ اِلَّا كَانُوْا بِهٖ يَسْتَهْزِءُوْنَ‏ [/RIGHT]
But there never came to them a Prophet but they mocked at him.
[RIGHT][43:8] اور کوئی نبی ان کے پاس نہیں آتا تھا مگر وہ اس کے ساتھ تمسخر کیا کرتے تھے۔[/RIGHT]

Al-Hijr Chapter 15 : Verse 12](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=15&verse=11)

[RIGHT][15:12] وَمَا يَاْتِيْهِمْ مِّنْ رَّسُوْلٍ اِلَّا كَانُوْا بِهٖ يَسْتَهْزِءُوْنَ‏ [/RIGHT]
And there never came to them any Messenger but they mocked at him.
[RIGHT][15:12] اور کوئی رسول ان کے پاس نہیں آتا تھا مگر وہ اس سے تمسخر کیا کرتے تھے۔[/RIGHT]

Al-`Ankabut Chapter 29 : Verse 19](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=29&verse=18)

[RIGHT][29:19] وَاِنْ تُكَذِّبُوْا فَقَدْ كَذَّبَ اُمَمٌ مِّنْ قَبْلِكُمْ*ؕ وَمَا عَلَى الرَّسُوْلِ اِلَّا الْبَلٰغُ الْمُبِيْنُ‏ [/RIGHT]
‘And if you reject, then generations before you *also *rejected. And the Messenger is only responsible for the clear conveying of the Message

[RIGHT][29:19] اور اگر تم تکذیب کرو تو تم سے پہلے بھی کئی اُمّتیں تکذیب کر چکی ہیں۔ اور پیغمبر پر کھلا کھلا پیغام پہنچانے کے سوا کچھ فرض نہیں۔[/RIGHT]

YaSin Chapter 36 : Verse 31](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=36&verse=30)

[RIGHT][36:31] يٰحَسْرَةً عَلَى الْعِبَادِ *ۚ مَا يَاْتِيْهِمْ مِّنْ رَّسُوْلٍ اِلَّا كَانُوْا بِهٖ يَسْتَهْزِءُوْنَ‏ [/RIGHT]
Alas for *My *servants! there comes not a Messenger to them but they mock at him
[RIGHT][36:31] وائے حسرت بندوں پر! ان کے پاس کوئی رسول نہیں آتا مگر وہ اس سے ٹھٹھا کرنے لگتے ہیں۔[/RIGHT]

So you see that it is not unusual to do mockery at Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahamd of Qadian (as) as it has been done to all other prophets of Allah that came previously, and this actually shows the sign of his truthfulness.

And if you say that there is no prophet after Muhammad (saw), then Quran reminds us Muslims, that this is not the first time, that this has been said. For example the following Ayat purports that Prophets have been coming in this world from time immemmorial but men are so constituted that whenever a prophet came, they rejected and opposed him. And when he died, they said that no prophet can come after him and the door of revelation was shut for ever. This attitude of disbelievers has led to rejection of every prophet.

Al-Mu’min Chapter 40 : Verse 35](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=40&verse=34)

[RIGHT][40:35] وَلَقَدْ جَآءَكُمْ يُوْسُفُ مِنْ قَبْلُ بِالْبَيِّنٰتِ فَمَا زِلْتُمْ فِىْ شَكٍّ مِّمَّا جَآءَكُمْ بِهٖؕ حَتّٰٓى اِذَا هَلَكَ قُلْتُمْ لَنْ يَّبْعَثَ اللّٰهُ مِنْۢ بَعْدِهٖ رَسُوْلاً ؕكَذٰلِكَ يُضِلُّ اللّٰهُ مَنْ هُوَ مُسْرِفٌ مُّرْتَابٌۚ ۖ‏ [/RIGHT]
And Joseph did come to you before with clear proofs, but you ceased not to be in doubt concerning that with which he came to you till, when he died, you said: ‘Allah will never raise up a Messenger after him.’ Thus does Allah adjudge as lost those who transgress, *and *are doubters
[RIGHT][40:35] اور یقیناً تمہارے پاس اس سے پہلے یوسف بھی کھلے کھلے نشانات لے کر آچکا ہے مگر تم اُس بارہ میں ہمیشہ شک میں رہے ہو جو وہ تمہارے پاس لایا یہاں تک کہ جب وہ مر گیا تو تم کہنے لگے کہ اب اس کے بعد اللہ ہرگز کوئی رسول مبعوث نہیں کرے گا۔ اسی طرح اللہ حد سے بڑھنے والے (اور) شکوک میں مبتلا رہنے والے کو گمراہ ٹھہراتا ہے۔[/RIGHT]

Ofcourse, Ahmadies believe that there will be no “Shariati” or “Law bearing Prophet” after Muhammad (saw) as Quran tells us so, but to say that there will be no prophet (Ummati or Subordinate), then it is a contradiction to Quran, Hadith and belief of Sahaba (ra):

Hazrat Ayesha (ra) stated

“Certainly, do say, he, (The Holy Prophet), is the Seal of all Prophets, but do not say, there is no prophet after him.” (Takmala Majma-ul-Bihar p.15; Vol. 4, p. 85 by Hazrat Imam Sheikh Muhammad Tahir Gujrati)

And if you say that Quran declares AnHuzur (saw) as Khatam, so there can’t be any prophet after him. Then let me tell you that the word is “KHATAM” and not “KHATIM”:

Authentic Arabic Lexicons ((Lane); (Aqrab); (Mufradat); (Fath); (Zurqani) state that Khatam can mean 1) seal, stamp, mark, imprint, impress; 2) best and most perfect, embellishment or ornament; 3) to secure, protect oneself against a thing; 4) signet ring; 5) produce an impression or effect upon a thing; 6) the end or last part of a thing. Allah uses Khatam with a fatha, a stroke above and not with a kasra, which is a stroke below. Khatam’s primary meaning is seal, while khatim would definitively mean the last person/one.

Next I cite none other than Imam Bukhari himself.

Imam Bukhari has commented on this verse and said this means a mark on the Prophet (saw) holy person. Prophet Muhammad (saw) is Khatam in the sense that he is the possessor of the Seal of Prophets, without whose certification no one can even be considered to be a true prophet. He is Khatam in the sense that he is the best and quintessential example of a prophet. He is Khatam in the sense that like the signet ring he wore and used to seal documents,[2] he can create an impression of his character on whomsoever is worthy of receiving it. He is Khatam as he bore a birthmark[3] on his back that allowed Hazrat Salman Farsi (ra) to declare he was a true prophet. This birthmark was literally referred to as “Khatam An-Nubuwwa.”

Here are the authentic references of the above quote. Nowhere does Imam Bukhari state that it means last or Prophets. Instead he defines Muhammad (sa) as the Seal of Prophets in the sense that , " without whose certification no one can even be considered to be a true prophet"

[2] (Sahih Jami’ Bukhari, Vol. I, Book 3, #65, Book 10, #546, Book 11, #630; Vol. IV, Book 52, #189, Book 53, #338; Vol. VII, Book 72, #755-759, 761-764, 766-767; Vol. IX, Book 89, #276); (Sahih Jami’ Muslim, Book 4, #1336-1338; Ch. 11-12, Book 24, #5212-5229); (Sahih Jami’ Tirmidhi, Ch. 11, #1-8; Ch. 12, #1-9); (Sunan Abu Daud, Book 1, #19; Book 34, #4212, 4214-4215, 4217)
[3] (Sahih Jami’ Bukhari, Vol. I, Book 4, #189; Vol. IV, Book 52, 305, Book 56, #741; Vol. VII, Book 70, #574; Vol. VIII, Book 73, #22, Book 75, #363); (Sahih Jami’ Muslim, Ch. 27-28, Book 30, #5789-5793); (Sahih Jami’ Tirmidhi, Ch.2, #1-8); (Sunan Abu Daud, Book 32, #4071)

Here is the testimony of one of the most well known scholars of Islam.

Hazrat Maulvi Abul Qaseem Nantovi, the renowned founder of the Deoband Academy states, “In the conception of the masses the Holy Prophet (saw) was Khatam in the sense that he came after all the other prophets and that he was the last prophet of all. But it is evident that in the estimation of the wise no superiority whatever attaches to precedence in time or its reverse … If a prophet appeared after the Holy Prophet (saw), it would in no way affect his finality.” (Tahzirunnas, Saharanpur, pp. 3, 28)

But there is much much more evidence. Below I provide just a few more unique Hadeeth that are very relavent to this situation.

Abu Bakr is the best of men after me except a prophet should appear.”(Kanzul Ummal)

“Abu Bakr is the best of the people after me except one who may be a prophet.”(Tabrani Kabir Kamil Ibne Adi quoted in Jame Saghir by Imam Suyuti, p.5)

“Abu Bakr is the best of my followers except anyone who might be a prophet.”(Dalmy quoted by Kanzul Haqaiq of Imam Mondadi, p. 7)

“Abu Bakr holds the highest place in this Ummah except that a prophet is raised amongst them.”(Kanzul Haqaiqi Hadith Khair-el-Khalaiq by Alama Abdur Rauf, Munavi)

But I have more reference from previous scholars of Islam which are as follows:
‘The rising of prophets after the Khatamar Rasul Hazrat Muhammad, the Chosen One, peace and blessings be upon him, from among his own followers and as a heritage, does not in any way run counter to his status as the Khatamar rasul. Therefore, O reader, do not be among those who doubt.’
Maktubat Imam Rabbani, Hazrat Mujaddid Alf Thani

‘From the study and contemplation of the Darud we have arrived at the definite conclusion that there shall, from among the Muslims, certainly be persons whose status, in the matter of prophethood, shall advance to the level of prophets, if Allah pleases. But they shall not be given any book of law.’
Fatuhati Makiyyah: Vol 1. pg 545
The Muhaddith of Dehli, Hazrat Shah Wali Ullah subscribed to this opinion and stated:
‘The meaning of the Holy Prophet being the Khataman Nabiyeen is that there shall not now appear a person whom God may appoint with a new Law for mankind, that is to say, there shall be no prophet who shall come with a new Law.’
(Tafheemati Ilahiyyah pg. 53)

Hazrat Sayyed Abdul Karim Jilani, the renowned mystic of the 8th century Hijra was of the opinion that:
'The coming of the Law bearing prophets, after the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings on him, has ceased as he has been exalted to be the Khataman Nabiyeen because he brought with him such a perfect law as no other prophet had brought before him.
(Al Insanul Kamil: Vol 1. Ch 36. Pg 68)

The great saint, Hazrat Maulana Room (Rehmatullah Alaihi) writes:
“Make such plans to perform righteousness in the way of God that you attain prophethood within the Ummat (religious community)”

(Mathnavi Maulana Room, Daftar I, pg. 53) [size=]
[/size]
So, the matter is clear that there can appear subordinate prophets after Muhammad (saw).

And if you say that Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian (as) was Nauzobillah, “a liar”, then my friend - you don’t have to do anything, as it is Allah who deals with such a people who forge a lie against HIM, as said in Quran:

Al-Haqqah Chapter 69 : Verse 45](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=69&verse=44)

[RIGHT][69:45] وَلَوْ تَقَوَّلَ عَلَيْنَا بَعْضَ الْاَقَاوِيْلِۙ‏ [/RIGHT]
And if he had forged and attributed any sayings to Us

[RIGHT][69:45] اور اگر وہ بعض باتیں جھوٹے طور پر ہماری طرف منسوب کر دیتا ۔[/RIGHT]

Al-Haqqah Chapter 69 : Verse 46](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=69&verse=45)

[RIGHT][69:46] لَاَخَذْنَا مِنْهُ بِالْيَمِيْنِۙ‏ [/RIGHT]

We would surely have seized him by the right hand

[RIGHT][69:46] تو ہم اُسے ضرور داہنے ہاتھ سے پکڑ لیتے۔ [/RIGHT]

Al-Haqqah Chapter 69 : Verse 47](http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=69&verse=46)

[RIGHT][69:47] ُمَّ لَقَطَعْنَا مِنْهُ الْوَتِيْنَ ۖ‏ [/RIGHT]

And then surely We would have severed his life-artery [69:47]پھر ہم یقیناً اُس کی رگ
[RIGHT]جان کاٹ ڈالتے۔ [/RIGHT]

Crankthatskunk: I think, if you had spent half of your time in spreading message of Islam to non-muslims, that would be much better use of your time. As no where has God mentioned that calling a Muslim as “Kaafir” will have a reward in hereafter or proving someone as “Kaafir” will have a reward.

Peace!

Please take notice on what you said above that i highlighted. You indirectly are taking away the prophethood of Jesus (AS) when He returns. Does this not go against your belief? if it does not, then it sure does go against Quran, where He is the RasulAllah.

Last means the last to die. Its got nothing to do with who was 'born' first. your interpretation of the word khataman nabiyeen means 'the last' prophet. Last in what sense then?

On other hand, Ahmadis interpretation of Khatmannabiyeen is that He SAW was the greatest, most exalted, most perfect, and no Prophet has ever been given such status as Muhammad SAW.

Heres a scenerio for you, which i posted in another thread as well. This scenerio can be applied right here on GS as well.


I write something in thread A and then post it.
I then write something in thread B and post it too.

This is how thread B comes on top of thread A

I then go back in thread A, and edit my post.

Thread B will still be on top of the page, while if you see , the last thread i posted/edited was in thread A

My last post will be considered only the one where i posted/edited the last. It does not mean which threads out of these i posted first. If i keep editing my posts on other threads, it will start becoming my 'last' post. Again, what we are concentrating here is the 'last' and not which was written first.


Jesus (AS) of nazareth, according to you will live amongst mankind and die. Hence, although believing in Islam and what not, He died the 'last'. Does not matter if He (AS) came before Huzoor Anwar (SAW). Again, we are talking about the 'last' and not the first.

PS: how is it appropriate for you to say that Isa (AS) can come after hazrat Muhammad PBUH and still not contradict your definition of khatme naboowat. You've got to pick either one belief. Either theres no prophet after Muhammad PBUH,(that includes Isa AS) or if there is , then your interpretation of Khatme nabuwat is false.

PS2: alas, how important it is for you to save the meaning of khatme nabuwat that Mullahs did, and in the meantime bringing someone prior to Muhammad PBUH's era back and not calling him Prophet , just so you can save the meaning of the word 'khatam'. But, alas again... how the term khatam cannot carry one simple meaning of it. (either last and no one after, or either someone after but khatam still means last ). Amazing stuff.

Excellent post, kchughtai. But it appears that the crank guy is here only to stir up hatred and to promote his blog. Every post of his he’s referencing to his blog. He has no real intention of engaging in a useful debate. His knowledge base, despite his lofty claims, seems very limited.

Re: Need some information 4 Ahmedies

Yup good reply Chugtaai....he still has to proove his skills in reading Urdu.

Re: Need some information 4 Ahmedies

[mod]
**Guys, I have cleaned this thread. Please, take a moment and review religion forum rules. Failure to abide these rules will result in a warning or a ban. Also, anyone referring other members as kafir will recieve 50 warning points which will result in an automatic ban. I hope you guys will watch your language and will carry a constructive discussion. **

**GS Religion Forum Rules: **http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/213622-rules-religion-forum.html](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/213622-rules-religion-forum.html)

Thank you!
Lusi-

[/mod]

A. Certainly, He was a prophet as long as he was alive.

I have no knowledge on this.

Allah is all-knowing, omniscient

Already answered that

What should have become part of quran and what not, It is Allah to decide and nobody else. Are you questioning the act of Allah?
BTW, there is mention in quran regarding giving refuge to Jesus (as) and his mother mariam (as) on an elevated place

So there is some pointer towards his migration and refuge on a hilly land with green meadows and water springs. We think it was kashmir.

Don’t you think, your tone sounds blasphemous. Again questioning the act of Allah. Do you think, in Quran, there is detailed life sketch of every prophet from birth till death? There were 124000 messengers. How many of them do we know by name?
How many of the messengers mentioned in the Quran, do we know detailed life sketch with timeline.

Again same question.

hmmm, should I quote the verses. Ok here they are:

It was a matter between the holy prophet (pbuh) and Christians of Najran. The christians believed that Jesus (as) is a son of God due to his miraculous birth.
Allah compared Jesus (as) with Adam (as) with respect to their births.
No question of death or ascension of Jesus (as).

As far as “full” knowledge is concerned, there is no word in the ayat that can be translated to “full”.

Word by word translation should be .. “After what has come to thee of knowledge”. More than that Allah knows best.

Anyways, the comparison of Jesus’ [as] birth with that Adam [as] was presented as ‘Hujjat’ to christians.

here is a list of some references on death of Jesus.