Re: Mustafa kamal announce new party
I never knew that word 'badkirdar' (immoral) is an abusive word. :)
Regardless of I believe Imran is badkirdar or a decent person, I do believe that many Pakistani politicians are badkirdar, haramkhor, liars, crooks, fraud, cheats, cons, rather worse than devils.
I can understand that it is wrong to abuse person (personal life) of non-public figures, but politicians are not anyone, they are public figures. They are in field where a person represents public (each and every Pakistani), and make policies and effect the life of public. Thus it is right of public (Pakistanis) to discuss and scrutinize politicians, not only what they say or do, but also their personal life.
It is also right of Pakistanis to develop image of politicians according to their perception, and duty of politicians to clear their image.
This is necessary too, as many politician lie and try to make fool of masses. If people cannot mention or question their personal life than under the cover of silence, they can easily fool masses and harm the country.
Just imagine, when Prophet (SAW) gave message and preached Meccans, first thing he (SAW) did was quoted his personal life and character himself, than only asked Meccan to listen him, trust him, and believe him.
When a woman stood up asking Umar (RA) about cloth he was wearing, it was questioning personal life of Umar (RA), and Umar (RA) did not told her to not talk about his personal life, rather Umar (RA) answered her. If Umar (RA) was not representing people, no one had right to ask him where he got the cloths he was wearing, neither he needed to answer.
In western democracy, personal life of public figures, including politician is important. Clinton personal life with Monica became heading in all newspapers and topic of many talks, but no one even questioned why Clinton personal life is getting discussed. Nixon lying became an excuse to throw him out of office. Same is happening in India where Modi marriage, his treatment of wife, and personal life came in news for discussion ... and that is expected, as he is in politics and thus public personality. Even personal life of British Royal family, being public figures, are open for discussion.
we have this discussion before as well. let me explain again.
the point is, why address someone with a title which will alienate his supporters and they will most likely react negatively and we will get into same negative war that we want to avoid. calling leaders ganja, bayhaya, badkardar, haramkhor, zaniee, sharabiee is not something which is required.
**now let me be very clear. you can certainly discuss leaders shortcomings but in a constructive way and in a context. no one will stop you but no dirty titles.
for example you can discuss that nawaz sharif or his family is involved in corruption in a context without calling him all sort of names. Do you really need to say that ha-ra-miee ganjay nay corruption kee hai? which civilized person will use such lingo?
you want to discuss leaders' lota-ism, please do so. no one will stop you but no need to abuse them.
you want to disscuss imran's U-turns or support for taliban, please do so. no one will stop you but do you really need to call him taliban khan, killer khan?
**
no sir, we will not allow such language and this is not up for debate.
thx for your understanding.