If Muslims launched a nuclear attack on a Western city, you would be cheering them, wouldn't you?
WT*
sir your are always wrong (THIS THE FACT)
you are such a hypocrite that you only care for peoples live in west. whereas i even doubt you live in west. hate is your deal. you discriminate humanity by creating a line between west and east. ppl like you are spreading hate, who dont even even know what its like to live among different ethnicities.
and forgot-sake keep you demagogic views to yourself.
you are such a hypocrite that you only care for peoples live in west. whereas i even doubt you live in west.
hate is your deal. you discriminate humanity by creating a line between west and east. ppl like you are spreading hate, who dont even even know what its like to live among different ethnicities.
and forgot-sake keep you demagogic views to yourself.
No the only ones spewing hate are hypocritical Pakistani Muslims who are only interested in making the West into their Talibanized crapholes.
And contrary to what you think, yes I do live in the West. I rather live in the West than in any Muslim country on Earth.
And you don't care for the plight of Christians and other non-Muslims living under Muslim rule, since you think it's okay to persecute Christians in Pakistan and chop the heads off of Indonesian Christian girls in Pogo as "Ramadan trophies".
That 0.4% is relevant is because people like you always harp about Hiroshima and Nagasaki
I am just putting it on context
And besides I am 100% sure that you didn't know that 70 million people died in World War II
or 300,000 Japanese and 30,000 Americans had died in April-July 1945 Battle of Okinawa
please,
I know my facts
So you are trying to say, that one has to differ between a death body and a death body? Blood and blood are not the same, just coz on one hand you have cheap blood (arabs, japanese) and on the other hand the blood (american, european) that need not to be spilt?
You amaze me more and more.
People calling themselves 'moderate muslims' have to look at their own hypocricy now.
The muslim organizations in britain and elsewhere have made statements to the effect that " the punishment is an over reaction" instead of coming out and saying "she did NOT commit any mistake".
Therefore. We conclude thar either the "moderate muslims" either believe she made a mistake or they are to scared to dsay the truth.
Either case this makes moderate muslims no better than the morons in sudan. thE only difference is some strap bombs and go kill and others just stay home and yell 'over reaction'.
Many here may be shocked by above statement and may even be. Hurt or offended. But really - look inside yourself. If you believe that the teacher made even a tiny error, the cancer is inside you.
Yes there are freaky laws all over the world. Fortunately in most areas they don't give you lashes, imprison you, stone you or have thousands chanting for your death for violating them. The Sudanese should be kissing this woman's feet for putting up with their freaky country and their freaky laws, slavery, genital mutilation, genocide, abject proverty, discimination, extrajudicial killings, torture and arbitrary arrests while sacrificing to bring a little light to that dim country.
Semi is missing the point (now you know why I have zero rep power). Why was or even still is it about beating, lashing, cutting, stoning, burning (as in Catholics) and killing (as in the US, where, if anything, they want to expand death penalty to include several more crimes)? Like democracy, it's about money. It takes quite a bit money to build and run a prison system. It's really this woman's fault that she chose to live in such a country.
Today, they've got some dought, and they compalin how primitive Islam is. As late as in 17th century England and America, penalty for just about any crime, including stealing, was hanging.
Not sure what you are saying here... it is excusable or even braggable that Sudan is only 400 years behind the times in human and civil rights?
This woman follows a belief system that teaches her to give charity, not just to her own, but in societies that are diametrically opposed to it? And it's her fault for having such morals?
wikipedia is not a reliable source for research bring any thing from Encyclopedia of Britannica, Now with this kind of websites I hope we will be able to change history:D Where you are th emain countributer of the site:D
America dropped atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki killing 300,000 people but 70 million people died in world war II
70,000,000/300,000 = 0.4% of all deaths in World War II were from Nuclear Weapons
and besides the invasion of Japan planned for 1946 would have lead to the deaths of 10 million Japanese and 1 Million American troops
so please learn to put things on context before speaking
How about Japanese generations are facing the consequences of that bombing. Still new born children have birth defects because of that US action. PS: Any thing against your wishes bother you and you think other person need to do this and that better YOU HAVE TO LEARN OTHER HAVE THEIR OWN THOUGHTS AND FREEDOM TO EXPRESS THEIR IDEAS as they want"
wikipedia is not a reliable source for research bring any thing from Encyclopedia of Britannica,Now with this kind of websites I hope we will be able to change history:D Where you are th emain countributer of the site:D
Just look at the history tab and you will see I am the main contributor
As for Encyclopedia Brittannica, a study carried out showed that Wikipedia had less errors than EB
How about Japanese generations are facing the consequences of that bombing. Still new born children have birth defects because of that US action.PS: Any thing against your wishes bother you and you think other person need to do this and that better YOU HAVE TO LEARN OTHER HAVE THEIR OWN THOUGHTS AND FREEDOM TO EXPRESS THEIR IDEAS as they want"
Absolutely
but when you make a hokey argument without knowing all the facts then I am going to call your argument to task
instead of condemning hiroshima or nagasaki which ended world war II, you should instead condemn Firebombing of Tokyo in March 1945 which killed 150,000 people or the bombing of Dresden in February 1945 which killed 70,000 germans, etc...
those two actions served no military target but were done as a show piece to demonstrate air power
like I said, read a little before you jump into something where only the big boys can play otherwise you will get rolled over
Yes there are freaky laws all over the world. Fortunately in most areas they don't give you lashes, imprison you, stone you or have thousands chanting for your death for violating them. The Sudanese should be kissing this woman's feet for putting up with their freaky country and their freaky laws, slavery, genital mutilation, genocide, abject proverty, discimination, extrajudicial killings, torture and arbitrary arrests while sacrificing to bring a little light to that dim country.
True coz in most areas of US of A, you end up at any hidden prison, tortured and humilated. Finally having nothing but permanent physical and psychic damages, a ruined future and If you lucky you get some media attention by the some ppl of the same US of A getting redress for surviving the stay at Guantonamo Bay. A 5 star treatment, no doubt.
True coz in most areas of US of A, you end up at any hidden prison, tortured and humilated. Finally having nothing but permanent physical and psychic damages, a ruined future and If you lucky you get some media attention by the some ppl of the same US of A getting redress for surviving the stay at Guantonamo Bay. A 5 star treatment, no doubt.
If that is the case then why are so many muslims clamouring to illegally immigrate to USA?
)
bahahahaha…