I understand that there are exceptions ⦠I know you to be among them ⦠Alhumdulillah, but the response that you have given is not addressing the point that I was trying to make. The point I am making is that of American media and news, the film industry is Dajjalic in its approach - They have taken ideas directly from books such as Animal Farm and Brave New World and are implementing it on a global scale.
There are systematic methods being employed to ensure society graze like cattle - kept happy and productive and to have fights with one another - sports as well ⦠these keep society from asking the government difficult questions.
Education - dumbing down - there are lots of criticisms regarding this
Nationalism - people are taught to love flag with emotional attachment
Films - Americans always win or are the heroes.
Freedom - given to the public within a given framework
Fear - Enough conspiracies are released to keep the people cautious of the administration
Faith is not what they control ⦠they allow it fester in two main forms - radical right or ultra left ⦠this ensures the infighting and alienating of one another.
It is not that everyone falls in to this but the majority are ⦠Iām talking about their own people ⦠not just the minorities. People are generally unable to work out what is hypocritical about the US policies within the US ⦠Few try to make a stand ⦠Look at the slogan: You are either with us or with the terrorists ⦠This is a fallacy ⦠There is always another option. It is possible to be with neither ⦠Few raise this point ā¦
Otherwise, there are ongoing East Coast and West Coast issues, when really the main issue is unfair treatment of both by the government ⦠And the list goes on ā¦
āCommonly subject to limitationsā but not always. And as I mentioned in my last post whether free speech is considered āslanderā is up to the courts to decide. However, any free speech that may be derogatory to a group/person does not automatically become slander.
If someone considers any speech as slander, the remedy is to go to courts. Burning flags, consulates and killing people is not the answer.
On one end you guys want the US to apologize for the movie. On the other end you guys claim the protests are in response to a much bigger issue. So should the US apologize for the atrocities that have been committed around the world or for the movie??
Secondly, this movie is not a hate crime. A hate crime is when a person is actually hurt due to their race, religion or ethnicity. No one was hurt here. Hate speech is protected by the Constitution. No one has ever gotten arrested for expressing a view no matter how hateful it is. People living in other parts of the world just fail to comprehend this. In fact the second amendment is hurting the US and giving rise to domestic terrorism but since the right to own a gun has been explicitly stated in the Cobstitution, an amendment is required to prevent easy access to guns.
And people need to stop pulling laws out of thin air. Holocaust denial may be a crime in Europe but itās definitely not a crime in the US. I can be standing at the corner of Times Square distributing pamphlets about Holocaust denial and there is nothing the US can do. And for all you people saying saying anything against blacks is a crimeā¦wrong again! The KKK is still an active organization and just recently the ACLU even represented the KKK coz they were denied the right to put up some sign somewhere. whether you agree with this absolute freedom is besides the point. Itās the law of the land.
I donāt know why people living in the UK are all praise for their country when it is just as much responsible for the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. At least the US was a target of Al Qaeda. The UK had nothing to do with the war yet one push by the US and they went right into Iraq and Afghanistan. Countries all over the world are US puppets and shouldnāt be but such is the world dynamics these days. People just live to jump on the āletās bash the USā bandwagon and fail to see where their own leaders and people are at fault. Typical victim mentality.
I have seen people with extreme views and having hint of saying US war against Talibans is unjustifed in the mosque, getting round up by FBI under Patriotic act. Some of them never seen the daylight and are considered āmissingā now. Did they not have freedom of speech?
Arenāt you in the UK? Why donāt you criticize the UK for being a US puppet and invading every country the US sets its eyes on.
Not directed at you but people on this forum just donāt like to argue based on facts. They love to state their own opinions and prejudices without any facts backing it up and when the other person actually does bring up a fact, their response is downright absurd and hilarious.
For heavens sake Julian Assange did not exercise freedom of speech!! He stole classified documents which is a crime. Freedom of speech involves the expression of your own thoughts and opinions!
*The Washington Post reported that the department was considering charges under the Espionage Act, a move which former prosecutors characterised as ādifficultā because of First Amendment protections for the press.[SUP][71]](WikiLeaks - Wikipedia)[/SUP][SUP][73]](WikiLeaks - Wikipedia)[/SUP] Several Supreme Court cases have previously established that the American constitution protects the re-publication of illegally gained information provided the publishers did not themselves break any laws in acquiring it.[SUP][74]](WikiLeaks - Wikipedia)[/SUP] Federal prosecutors have also considered prosecuting Assange for trafficking in stolen government property, but since the diplomatic cables are intellectual rather than physical property, that approach also faces hurdles.
*On threats by various governments toward Assange, legal expert Ben Saul argues that founder Julian Assange is the target of a global smear campaign to demonise him as a criminal or as a terrorist, without any legal basis.[SUP][82]](WikiLeaks - Wikipedia)[/SUP] The U.S. (Center for Constitutional Rights - Wikipedia) has issued a statement highlighting its alarm at the āmultiple examples of legal overreach and irregularitiesā in his arrest.[SUP][83]](WikiLeaks - Wikipedia)[/SUP]
Care to enlighten what people have been arrested and are still in prison
for stating anti American views?? I donāt know of any so how do you? Also the Patriot Act was enacted during a time of war and yes freedom and rights were abused but this country was in a state of panic and took whatever steps to ensure their citizens were safe. I donāt agree with the ramifications of the Patriot Act but that Act pertains to war on terror so itās an entirely different matter.
Jimmy Carter wrote a book about Israel being an apartheid state and it was published and was available throughout the country. Again freedom of speech! there is no bias against it.
Maybe to you itās journalism but again as per law, a countryās classified documents are its property and stealing them and publishing them is a crime. Just like hacking is a crime, its NOT freedom of expression.
What you say is true. But that is the problem with man made laws. They create problems. Hate speech may not be a US recognised crime, but it is a moral crime. Hate speech is prevented in the work place and schools, Iām sure, within the US. My approach to this discussion is to realise the inconsistency. There are levels of censorship that are in the US media. Speech is not free really. What would be the fate if an organisation set-up in the US campaigning for Islamic Shariāah to be established in the US? The truth of āfreedomā is that the populous are coached to think a certain way ⦠and 99% of the time that coaching ensures that the people will not think out of the box that was created for them ā¦
Consider a fruit seller he has all the different types of apples and he sells on the basis that you are free to choose ⦠If someone comes along and asks for an orange, he will not be able to comply, rather the people who come to his stall will not know about oranges they will be unaware that oranges exist. To them all the fruit in the world are represented by the variety of apples he has in his stall.
Yes hate speech is not a crime - but it should be. The US law makers have got it wrong. It is a law in other Western countries, not that they are necessarily any better. The western ideals have rid people of what they used to hold sacred. No longer are even parents considered sacred property in the US. Cartoons (mind altering) such as the Simpsons make it seem funny to insult parents ⦠There is no boundary to retaliate ⦠nothing is sacred anymore - on top of that Muslims will be hesitant to stoop to that low. We cannot go against our faith and insult another personās religion, our religion prevents us from that. So how do we react to being insulted? We can indeed ignore it. We can use it as an opportunity to educate or be even nicer. Some of us can do that ⦠I donāt however blame the ignorant people among us from behaving ignorantly. They are merely reacting in the way they can ⦠it may be out of their control. It may be a ruse as well ⦠I dunno. The US aught to be consistent with their policies, or accept that some of their people will become under threat from the root causes of actions of some of their own people.
*The Washington Post reported that the department was considering charges under the Espionage Act, a move which former prosecutors characterised as ādifficultā because of First Amendment protections for the press.[SUP][71]](WikiLeaks - Wikipedia)[/SUP][SUP][73]](WikiLeaks - Wikipedia)[/SUP] Several Supreme Court cases have previously established that the American constitution protects the re-publication of illegally gained information provided the publishers did not themselves break any laws in acquiring it.[SUP][74]](WikiLeaks - Wikipedia)[/SUP] Federal prosecutors have also considered prosecuting Assange for trafficking in stolen government property, but since the diplomatic cables are intellectual rather than physical property, that approach also faces hurdles.
On threats by various governments toward Assange, legal expert Ben Saul argues that founder Julian Assange is the target of a global smear campaign to demonise him as a criminal or as a terrorist, without any legal basis.[SUP][82]](WikiLeaks - Wikipedia)[/SUP] The U.S. (Center for Constitutional Rights - Wikipedia) has issued a statement highlighting its alarm at the āmultiple examples of legal overreach and irregularitiesā in his arrest.[SUP][83]](WikiLeaks - Wikipedia)[/SUP]*
This YouTube video was not produced by the US government. I hear so much garbage about how horrible the kuffar are in the US and the gora is out to get us and all thatā¦how would you like it if those Muslims got arrested? Burqay wali aurteinā¦haye allah humaray bachon to tabah kardengay ye shaitanā¦why donāt we arrest them too?
He condemned it, so do we.
By this theory, US is also responsible for 9/11 and the weakened Islam all over the country, rap music, mini skirts, heart attacks and Alzheimerās. Anything else?