Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

I assume from your answer that the prophet neither commanded nor checked the Hadiths.

If Joseph and Mary didn’t tell people that Joseph was not the father, then the people correctly would “suppose” that he was the father. Joseph never “adopted” Jesus as far as I know.

I actually do not understand what you are trying to achieve on this issue. You can’t just remove the parenthesis similar as you can’t remove brackets. They are there to indicate an explanation. :confused:

Biological father. Surely your English should be better than mine?

There exist great debates in Christianity through all the ages about this point. How much was Jesus human and how much was he Godly. Don’t want to get involved… A lot separates man form God even though both are three entities in one. God is God and man is a creation from God.

You did not include in your list of topics “Salvation” but it is one I would like to converse about later. This whole issue will then be dealt with. In short, man can’t save himself because he is tainted with sin and a holy/righteous/sinless person had to sacrifice him for man’s sin. No-one can foot the bill, only God.

Then the situation does not arise. One will merely feel an affinity towards the person after getting to know him. I suppose the whole concept of being Spirit filled will be difficult to grasp for someone not in the situation. It is similar to a man trying to understand a woman, not having been a woman himself. I can explain it but one needs to experience it to really understand it.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

Commanded I do not know but the checked part is true. The whole point of the existence of hadith is that the Prophet SAW was no longer in the midst of people.

Ok. So then Joseph is not the father of Jesus PBUH in any way.

Got you confused eh! I simply meant to say that the way things are written make a big difference in the way it is understood.

Don’t know, not moi first language. So then Jesus PBUH was not sired.

Now can you see our dilemma with Trinity. God would still be God if you did not attribute soul, spirit and body to him.

I agree we have been drifting into other topics slowly. I think we are almost at and end with scriptures. We are discussing more scriptural details now.

This affinity or spirit as you say in Christianity is what muslims means when they when Allah SWT wants to guide someone he gives them understanding of the religion. However we do not say there is an existent spirit being entering into the human. Whatever it is, it is abstract but we manifest it as knowledge and guidance.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

i have unfinished business with the old man on his explanations in this thread and before of trinity and salvation. whenever you guys start that i'd be very interested.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

We will still get to Salvation in this discussion, but why not start a thread with your queries/problems on the “trinity” issue? I will repond there. Then we don’t break the impetus of these series of discussions.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

I believe that the prophet did not know that something like the Hadith’s would be assembled otherwise he would have laid some guideline down for it, it would be general knowledge that he commanded such, and he might even have included some reference to it in the Qur’an.

In fact, I actually think that the prophet would be seriously disgusted with the division caused and focus on the Hadith’s in Islamic life. My personal opinion, but I think that the Hadith’s have complicated the life of a Muslim more than what the prophet had intended with the Qur’an. As I read through the Qur’an, I realised that the prophet tried to simplify complications in life by laying down simple rules. The Hadith’s complicate these simple rules and Islam is now sold to some scholars deciding by reasoning on Hadith’s what is the correct way. Judaism have the same system with the Talmud…

Joseph was assumed to be Jesus’ father in the eyes of the people living around him and Mary while Jesus grew up. We read in Matthew 13v54-55: Coming to his home town, he began teaching the people in their synagogue, and they were amazed. “Where did this man get this wissdom and these miraclulous powers?” They asked. “Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t his mother’s name Mary, and aren’t his brothers James, Joseph, Simon and Judas? Aren’t all his siters with us? Where then did this man get all these things?” And they took offence at him.

What is the Islamic view?

Was working very hard lately with about three hours sleep nightly. Deadlines and me spending too much time here… The crises is past now. :slight_smile:

Yes, that’s why I prefer communicating with a person I can see. One can communicate with much greater clarity.

You born and raised outside the USA?

Not in the normal human way. That’s what made it a miracle. In a previous post someone stated that the Spirit of God that “came over Mary” for her to become pregnant was the angel Gabriel. It sounded as if Mary was made pregnant by Gabriel…

God will be God no matter WHAT we humans attribute to Him…

Yes, I will compile my list from the Qur’an and then you and the other’s who want to contribute can maybe allay some of my problems. BTW. I will compile it from my own perspective, not from what other Christian scholars/theologians/website state about the Qur’an. Will take me some time but that I have now.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

^ I have completed the list but do not feel comfortable in posting it here. I took a short summary of ten points and will post them in stead.

Short summary of major problems with the Qur'an as per Christianity:

  1. Many differences in history and stories from the Old Testament.
  2. Some unscientific statements.
  3. Difference w.r.t. the teaching on God and the interaction with His creation.
  4. Basically NO mention of any of Jesus’ teachings.
  5. A Christian can identify with the way the Spirit of God is portrayed in the Qur’an although the identification is totally non-Islamic.
  6. The Qur’an is not historical correct.
  7. The Qur’an is harsh relative to Jesus’ more moralistic teaching.
  8. The Qur’an is stated to be perfect but various parts reflect inconsequence.
  9. Various religious practices and symbols of the area where the prophet Muhammad lived, but totally foreign to Judaism and Christianity, were incorporated into the teaching of the Qur’an.
  10. Nowhere in the Qur’an is stated that the New Testament was corrupted.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

USResident, if you want to go ahead with the next topic (Judgement Day), please feel free. To save time, why not include the two following topics as well since they are so closely linked with Judgement - Hell and Heaven.

I believe a lot can still be discussed and debated and argued on the present topic but in general it has run it's course as a discussion.

I actually do not want to go Qur'an bashing but are willing to debate with those that want to put the Bible under a magnifying glass - preferable in a seperate thread so as not to degrade this one.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

This is bad, The Old Man is not responding to me. Well just joking TOM thats a good sobriquet. PM me Just clarifying doubts.
Have a nice weekend

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

My sincere pardon. I did not see your post at the end of the previous page.

It all depends what you understand under “inspiration of the Holy Spirit”. If your definition is very narrow and means words are to be laid into the mind of the disciple to just write them down, then yes, you are correct in that NONE of the disciples were under “inspiration of the Holy Spirit” when they wrote the Gospels.

From the Bible “under inspiration of the Holy Spirit” means much-much more than above definition. It can mean that the Holy Spirit take over all actions of the person, but it can also mean that the Holy Spirit gently guide and assist the person to make the correct decisions.

Christians believe that Luke was under the “inspiration of the Holy Spirit” because of the following points:

  1. Many gospels were written but none from a logical, historical view, which the Gospel of Luke is.
  2. The Gospel of Luke only form half of the work Luke decided to do. Acts are maybe much more important because it is the only complete record of the early years of the church growth. Without it, many of the things under discussion in the letters of the apostles and others might be difficult to understand. Now the letters can be read in the background of what transpired in the church of the time.

How was Luke “inspired”?

  1. Firstly in deciding to do what others before him have done who were WITH Jesus and therefor more competent as eyewitness acounts.
  2. Secondly in deciding to include the early church growth in his task.
  3. Thirdly in trying to check all facts against what was written and eyewitness.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

Thanks, The Old Man, well, no problem its basically Holy Spirit guides though he has not been an eyewitness, but still he is inspired by the Holy Spirit.
To pen, authentic stuff in the bible.
I just summarize my understanding. They are couple of other doubts i will pm you thats much better.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

OK

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

please elaborate more…

many ppl have accepted Islam after seeing the high degree of ‘scientific accuracy’ in the Quran…
please give examples of this (sorry if u mentioned it earlier, i might not be following)…

also, where is historically wrong???

and yes, we’d like to see the inconsistencies too…

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

Please remember that the examples are from what I read in the Qur’an and not from websites dishing the Qur’an. I suppose if I went to these sites I might find many more so-called problem verses. I marked those I found as I read the Qur’an and list some problem for a Christian as requested. Some might be easy to explain. Please enlighten me.

  1. Scientifically suspect:

2.1 Surah 5:60 where people were transformed into apes and swine is not acceptable scientifically.
2.2 The story of the Companions of the Cave (Surah 18:9-25) is hard to accept. Can be made off as miracle though…
2.3 Scientifically Surah 18:86 where the sun set in a spring of murky water is incorrect.
2.4 It is frequently stated that the Qur’an is scientifically correct. According to Surah 18:47 the earth will be a “level stretch” (flat?) when the mountains are removed.
2.5 The story of the Gog and Magog (Surah 18:94-99) is like a fairy tale and unscientifical.
2.6 Surah 38:36 w.r.t. Solomon and his command over the wind is surely unscientific. Can be made off as miracles though…
2.7 How can there exist scientifically two Easts and two Wests as per Surah 55:17?
2.8 What Barrier as stated in Surah 55:19-20 exist between the two bodies of flowing water (salt and fresh as per other Surah’s?)?

  1. History and suspect facts:

6.1 The Qur’an teaches various historical occurrences different as portrayed in the Bible. With the Bible being the older of the two, written closer to the dates and various writers teaching the same in different books over many years, I have to conclude that one can only accept by faith the history as per the Qur’an and not by reason.
6.2 Surah 4:157-159 is in clear contradiction to what the whole New Testament teach w.r.t. Jesus’ death. Even other historical non-Christian manuscripts by renowned historians allude to the incident, such as Josephus and other Roman literature. Christians have to assume that the Qur’an is wrong as per references from the time.
6.3 I doubt highly if coats of chain mail was known in the days of David and Solomon as per Surah 21:80 and 34:11.
6.4 The “unlettered Prophet” (meaning the prophet Muhammad) is not mentioned in the Law or Gospels as per Surah 7:157.

  1. Inconsequent:

8.1 Surah 2:89 states “…confirming what is with them…” and as Christian I take it to refer to the Old Testament of the Jews. Unfortunately the Qur’an doesn’t confirm the Old Testament at all but contradicts it on almost every instance.
8.2 Surah 2:105 states that “None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten…” but Muslims accept that various things were changed, e.g. the direction of prayer. It is a contradicting statement.
8.3 Surah 8:65 is not happening today when considering the military history of the Middle-East.
8.4 Surah 10:37 states that the Qur’an is a “fuller explanation of the Book” (and I assume by the Book is meant the Jewish scriptures. BUT the Qur’an is not “fuller” but tremendously less in scope. It makes NO mention of verious important books of the Old Testament.
8.5 If the Qur’an is “perfect”, why the uncertainty in Surah 18:22 w.r.t. the number of people present in the cave?
8.6 If the Qur’an is perfect, why would Surah 20:113 mention that only “some of the warnings” are explained in detail in it?
8.7 Inconsistency in days the earth and sky were created as per Surah 41:9-12 (8 days) vs. Surah 57:4 (6 days).

No comment in general on items 1, 3-5, 7,9 & 10?

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

^Now this is what I was talking about get the scriptures and then we can argue, in my post in this thread. Below I am providing links to all your queries on top.

For the verses in the Inconsequent, with due respect to you sir, neither are they completey and out of context.

What, i like about The Old Man now is he is got the scriptures and I love it when someone comes out genuinely proving this points. Well this is what I preferred, rather then, talking about history of compilation.

Well The Old Man for all your answers, you can look at this video all the above points were a research of Dr. William Cambell, hence for this thread to be more knowledgeable, I would provide you with these links. It has answered all you questions on top.

Debate between Dr. Zakir Naik and Dr. William Cambell in Chicago 2002.

Bible and Quran in the Light of Science.

I would want you to pass the same comments after watching this video and if proven wrong its better you refrain to this. Since i respect you for your view, I want you to comment after watching this video. To make it easier for you, you can start watching from Part 2.

Quran and Bible in the Light of Science 1

Quran and Bible in the Light of Science 2

Quran and Bible in the Light of Science 3

Quran and Bible in the Light of Science 4

For all your other answers, it by Dr. Zakir Naik Quran and Modern Science Conflict or Conciliation. For eg, earth was created in 6 or 8 days it was questioned here in you can check the part 2 of the video.

Quran and Modern Science Conflict or Conciliation 1

Quran and Modern Science Conflict or Conciliation 2

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

I feel personally i dont wont to argue its better for the onlookers to see. Well in the same vain the Bible is proved wrong in the Old Testament, Chapter 1 Genesis itself but i refrain from quoting.

Now I will only quote, after you have watched the videos and get the points from the video. Its crystal clear as the debate is between two knowledgeable scholars.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

no…

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

As I have said, I don’t take kindly to links…

I wrote from own research and expect you to respond from yourself.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

armughal, thanks for spending the time to answer on each question, other than what others do.

2.1 the science that u talk about talks about evolution, and it wud really be ironical if that science finds this as wrong

So you then agree with science that men and apes are related because of this scripture in the Qur’an?

2.4 its ur wrong understanding, it just means that mountains shall be removed and u shall have an even surface…
no one ever mentioned ‘flat’ in it…

Level = flat

2.5 whats so unscientific about a nation that comes and robs ppl and terrorizes them, and then someone putting up a wall to stop them…
no one thinks the china wall is unscientific…

All the Mid-East have been scrutinized and mapped and explored and yet this location is secret? You wish to say Dhul’l-Qarnayn (Solomon?) build the Great Wall?

2.7 Outstanding…

6.1 since the other books were distorted so was the history in them…
u cant say Quran is wrong because its against Bible, cuz Bible cud be wrong itself…

Same from a Christian perspective. Unfortunately for both perspectives, most of the historical contend of the Bible are being proven by argeological and ancient literature means…the Qur’an’s version not.

6.2 this is about faith, so i wont comment on it…

Not if it is recorded in non-religious literature of more than one culture. But let’s leave it till we discuss the topic “Jesus” later…

6.3 u doubt = wrong???

I quote “Mail was used from the Roman era until the beginning of the 20th century. Though it was heavier and less protective than Plate Armor, it was highly flexible, ablative and easy to repair after damage. Some mail armor contained up to 200,000 rings.” from this link. You can see from here that the earliest use was maybe 350AD. Solomon lived ±960AD. Now prove to me that people immediately after Solomon’s reign had the capability for making this armour.

6.4 once again u see why we believe there r changes in the Bible u read today…

Unfortunately MANY manuscripts exist from the New Testament era and NONE reflect the statement. ALSO, as per my tenth point, the prophet Muhammad did not state that the Gospels were “corrupted”. If they were not corrupted in the prophet’s time, when were they? Me reference to point 6.4 is mainly based because the Gospels are mentioned. The proof unfortunately lie with Islam. Otherwise, you can always state this is a question of faith and just absolutely believing all to be accurate in the Qur’an not necessary hard evidence…

8.1 Not answered…

8.2 A change is a change.

8.4 u might have assumed it wrong…
the Book cud mean something else…

What then? Until then the statement stands.

8.5 there is no uncertainty…
Quran just tells u that ppl argue over useless details, and never even gave a number for it…
merely mentioned what different numbers ppl bring forward…

Why bring the uncertainty into the Qur’an? Perfect means without any doubt/certain. By not stating the number clearly the Qur’an becomes less perfect by reporting stories as gospel.

8.6 some of the warnings means some examples from previous nations who were warned and they did not heed and were punished…

It does not state “previous nations”. If the Qur’an is perfect, then I expect it to be complete. Complete = perfect, or do you wish me to believe the Qur’an is NOT complete?

8.7 there is no inconsistency there…
scholars have explained it over and over again…

As stated by me, the examples are from my own reading of the Qur’an not websites bashing the Qur’an. If you do not believe me, google any of my wording and see if it exist on the net. Explain to me the difference between the two numbers, please.

Other points no…

Noted

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

With due respect sir not hurting, you though i know all the answers, this is going to be impossible for you to read.

You feel you have got answers by your own research and not from any anti-islamic website, and expect me to believe you on this i am sorry. Because the questions you have brought up are what christian missionaries, query and spread it to people. Brother googling stuff you will get the opposite answer to your queries, well as I told you there is a complete thread started in this same forum, if you wanna read complete answers to your bashing then I would respect you.

Which everyone is aware of, if you dont wotn to go the links, i dont mind, but i personally feel you are running away from knowing the truth. This is what, i feel not hurting you but unfortunately, when you put up some stuff you should have done with some more research.

Because you have brought up stuff without the context, and without any research of your own, otherwise you would have refrained from copy pasting stuff.

Thanks for your support, I have done my bit well of course you want to do some more research forum is not the place as this should be done individually, but with an open mind.

Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Scriptures) - Islam and Christianity

[quote]

  1. Scientifically suspect:

2.1 Surah 5:60 where people were transformed into apes and swine is not acceptable scientifically.

[/quote]

This is the punishment by Allaah to the son of israel for takig the day of Sabbath lightly and were killed after 3 days, well this is not hing do with scientific this falls in the ambiguous slot as this is miraculous.

[quote]

2.2 The story of the Companions of the Cave (Surah 18:9-25) is hard to accept. Can be made off as miracle though....

[/quote]

This is again miraculous so i quote the same as above and if you read the complete context Allaah is mentioned that in there sleep they never slept on one side which from Scientific point of view would be a calamity for 309 years and this si proven from science today.

[quote]

2.3 Scientifically Surah 18:86 where the sun set in a spring of murky water is incorrect.

[/quote]

018.086
**YUSUFALI:* Until, when he reached the setting of the sun, he found it set in a spring of murky water: Near it he found a People: We said: "O Zul-qarnain! (thou hast authority,) either to punish them, or to treat them with kindness*."

Now this is the quote, here Allaah is telling it appeared to Zul qarnain, the sun is setting in murky water.

Scientifically to tell you can the sun set or can the sun rise these are terms. Well, forget about that Disaster was a word used for evil star during the Greek time but the word has evolved. Its a clear cut mis understanding from your part that it is unscientic here it clearly says it appeared to Zulqarnain, wel this query is answered in the link above.

[quote]

2.4 It is frequently stated that the Qur’an is scientifically correct. According to Surah 18:47 the earth will be a “level stretch” (flat?) when the mountains are removed.

[/quote]

It is explained by armughal, and explained really well. Again u misunderstand you havent taken the complete verse
018.047
**YUSUFALI:* One Day We shall remove the mountains, and thou wilt see the earth as a level stretch, and We shall gather them, all together, nor shall We leave out any one of them.*

Read it again and how it contradicts, well now this is your research this talks about the Judgement day that Allaah will destroy all the mountains and earth level as stretch fine that is remove the mountains means that if you remove the thorns from porcupines its levelled now this is just an eg. any kid would understand this.

[QUOTE]

2.5 The story of the Gog and Magog (Surah 18:94-99) is like a fairy tale and unscientifical.

[/QUOTE]

Well what fairy tale about it, well if you have found some stuff from mideast send the link across to me, i want to read the map. Since you have accused always get the evidence along side with you.

[quote]

2.6 Surah 38:36 w.r.t. Solomon and his command over the wind is surely unscientific. Can be made off as miracles though....

[/quote]

If moses can part the sea, Jesus can give life to death now, now is this amazing common how can this be unscientific well its fall in the ambiguous slot and thats miracle.

[quote]

2.7 How can there exist scientifically two Easts and two Wests as per Surah 55:17?

[/quote]

Now this is a stunner to everyone but here Allaah says in the Quran that is for both seen and unseen the scientist have proven this.Seen is well the Sunrise from east and west and unseen is
Today, the astronomers with their modern technologies and electronic gadgets know that the solar nebula is like a spinning disk. So are the galaxies and the observable universe.

Hence, the entire expanding universe also has its East and the West. We may call them the Outer Space East and the Outer Space West. The verse therefore acknowledges that Allah is not only the Rabb of everything that is upon this globe called the earth but also of what the astronomers can and can not observe today, with their most sophisticated electronic instruments. He is the Lord of the known and the un-known worlds

[quote]

2.8 What Barrier as stated in Surah 55:19-20 exist between the two bodies of flowing water (salt and fresh as per other Surah’s?)?

[/quote]

055.019YUSUFALI:* He has let free the two bodies of flowing water, meeting together: *
055.020YUSUFALI:* Between them is a Barrier which they do not transgress: *

Modern Science has discovered that in the places where two different seas meet, there is a barrier between them. This barrier divides the two seas so that each sea has its own temperature, salinity and density(Principles of Oceanography, Davis) Oceanologists are now in a better position to explain
this verse.

There is a slanted unseen water barrier between the two seas through which water from one sea passes to the other. But when the water from one sea enters the other sea, it loses its distinctive characteristic and becomes homogenized with the other water. In a way this barrier serves as a transitional homogenizing area for the two waters.

This phenomenon is also mentioned in the following verse of the Qur'an:
027.061 *
*YUSUFALI: Or, Who has made the earth firm to live in; made rivers in its midst; set thereon mountains immovable; and made a separating bar between the two bodies of flowing water? (can there be another) god besides Allah? Nay, most of them know not.

This phenomenon occurs in several places, including the divider between the Mediterranean and the Atlantic Ocean at Gibralter. A white bar can also be clearly seen at Cape Point, Cape Peninsula, South Africa where the Atlantic Ocean meets the Indian Ocean.
But when the Qur’an speaks about the divider between fresh and salt water, it mentions the existence of “a forbidding partition” with the barrier.

025.053 *
*YUSUFALI: It is He Who has let free the two bodies of flowing water: One palatable and sweet, and the other salt and bitter; yet has He made a barrier between them, a partition that is forbidden to be passed.

There is more to write, i have doen my own research on this topic of the Quran.

[quote]

  1. History and suspect facts:

6.1 The Qur’an teaches various historical occurrences different as portrayed in the Bible. With the Bible being the older of the two, written closer to the dates and various writers teaching the same in different books over many years, I have to conclude that one can only accept by faith the history as per the Qur’an and not by reason.
6.2 Surah 4:157-159 is in clear contradiction to what the whole New Testament teach w.r.t. Jesus’ death. Even other historical non-Christian manuscripts by renowned historians allude to the incident, such as Josephus and other Roman literature. Christians have to assume that the Qur’an is wrong as per references from the time.

[/quote]

Explained by armughal, well they are so many more books then the books who have told Jesus was not crucified by the christians itself sir, i dont wont to mention the names.

Just because you find Bible, contradicting with the Quran that doesnt mean bible is right and Quran is wrong we have to get the third source from outside, if you have one provide me with the link(i will think about reading it) of an authentic source not Islam bashing website.:)

[quote]

6.3 I doubt highly if coats of chain mail was known in the days of David and Solomon as per Surah 21:80 and 34:11.

[/quote]

Well Allaah did teach them mining and I believe in it period, probably that practise was left unfinished again your source above i dont go to the links, now this seems childish right but i have just followed you.

[quote]

6.4 The “unlettered Prophet” (meaning the prophet Muhammad) is not mentioned in the Law or Gospels as per Surah 7:157.

[/quote]

Note this is from King James version, well this is a shocker, i wonder how come you just pick topics which christian missionaries ask when they are in a dialogue.** I wonder how, well i have seen lots of debates even before accepting Islam as faith**

Almighty God speaks to Moses in Book of Deuteronomy chapter 18 verse 18:
"I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and I will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him."

Now you say and Christians. that this prophecy refers to Jesus (pbuh) because Jesus (pbuh) was like Moses (pbuh). Moses (pbuh) was a Jew, as well as Jesus (pbuh) was a Jew. Moses (pbuh) was a Prophet and Jesus (pbuh) was also a Prophet.

If these two are the only criteria for this prophecy to be fulfilled, then all the Prophets of the Bible who came after Moses (pbuh) such as Solomon, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Malachi, John the Baptist, etc. (pbut) will fulfill this prophecy since all were Jews as well as prophets.However, it is Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) who is like Moses (pbuh):

Now read for a stunner and a logical answer

i) Both had a father and a mother, while Jesus (pbuh) was born miraculously without any male intervention.
[Mathew 1:18 and Luke 1:35 and also Al-Qur'an 3:42-47]

ii) Both were married and had children. Jesus (pbuh) according to the Bible did not marry nor had children.

iii) Both died natural deaths. Jesus (pbuh) has been raised up alive. (4:157-158)

Muhammad (pbuh) is from among the brethren of Moses (pbuh). Arabs are brethren of Jews. Abraham (pbuh) had two sons: Ishmail and Isaac (pbut). The Arabs are the descendants of Ishmail (pbuh) and the Jews are the descendants of Isaac (pbuh).

Words in the mouth:
Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was unlettered and whatever revelations he received from Almighty God he repeated them verbatim.
"I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him."
[Deuteronomy 18:18]

iv) Both besides being Prophets were also kings i.e. they could inflict capital punishment. Jesus (pbuh) said, "My kingdom is not of this world." (John 18:36).

v) Both were accepted as Prophets by their people in their lifetime but Jesus (pbuh) was rejected by his people. John chapter 1 verse 11 states, "He came unto his own, but his own received him not."

iv) Both brought new laws and new regulations for their people. Jesus (pbuh) according to the Bible did not bring any new laws. (Mathew 5:17-18).

I refrain from putting more stuff, since I want you to digest this first.