Re: Interfaith Dialogue (Jesus PBUH and Muhammad PBUH) - Islam and Christianity
Its irrelevant.
One of reasons for using this word is because it was very common practice during the days of Jesus PBUH that Kings or leaders were annointed i.e. consecrated with oil. It was a ritual practice of those days. It simply is stating that Jesus PBUH would be appointed by consecration in line with the rituals of those days. Such practices did not prevail during the Prophet SAW time. The word has no far reaching implications beyond this.
OldMan, you are trying to confuse yourself here. The explanation I gave was a simple as it can get. This is why we say Christianity is so lost. Simple things are debated so much that they are blown out of their context and no longer retain any sense. This is exactly what you are doing here. Is understanding that Allah SWT gave Mary his Word for the glad tidings of Jesus PBUH difficult to understand. Its in plain english. Have you not ever gone around giving someone your word to do this or that. Its like you are promising something. What is so complicated in understanding that. Why don't you just accept the explanation as it simply is instead of debating it so much that both debaters loose track of what they were talking about and both end up confused.
The bible does not explicitly state that Jesus PBUH was greater than Muhammad PBUH. So this means that he was not, right? Your fighting with words instead of trying to make sense.