There were punjabi businessmen as well. I keep hearing how pashtuns and punjabis made karachi, so also admit that they screwed up in bangladesh as well. Fair is fair ! :)
But that is besides the point as labor reforms could have been done. In America, Reagan famously fired ATCs for going on strike as a matter of national security. Pakistan could've incentivize and then regulated any irregular behavior along with clamping down on unnecessary union violence which was the thing in East Pakistan.
As far as the capital goes, you forgot that Bengalis were much more pissed off when Islamabad was made the capital. It has its valid reasons, but lets not forget about it if we are airing grievances. Ultimately, all of this would be a no show if elections had taken place in 1959 or we would have accepted results in 1970 and genuine power would have been transferred. I think that it was in the 1956 constitution where 150 seats each would come from two wings and the President could be rotated between West and East Pakistan.
Heck, I would say have two prime ministers and even deputy prime ministers and then we could come together for national issues. East Pakistan could get its own central bank and local defense forces and you pretty much take care of the Six-Points. I still don't get the mental constipation that happened to unnecessarily spawn a destructive civil war.
Maybe I should have been PM and appointed Ali_syed commando as my scary defense minister. Jolie could be our shireen mazari and boretalk our opponents to comas! :D
Well you might wanna reconsider having me in your team. I just did that 'which leader are you' quiz and got Zulfiqar Bhutto as an answer...twice! :D
I like Shareen Mizari. How many women has the guts to match their hair colour with their clothes? Exactly. You go girl. But she's certainly a very learned and accomplished woman, most of the Generals in Pakistan Army are her ex students. That would almost constitute as my dream job.
And you believe this guy who was killed by his own guard while working as governor Punjab in former PPP government. It is a shame that pakis always quote from biased history which satisfies their ego. He has protecting Pakistan army by quoting Shaikh Mujib and ZAB, knowing that Yahya Khan was in power, who could have easily avoided blood shed and breakup if he wanted to.
I think you visit "Justice Hummodur Rehman Commission report for which I consider very neutral and fixed the major responsibility. For many years that report was behind the fat arses of Generals to show the public. It was finally Mush who allowed officially to disclose parts of that report.
This was the attitude of then ruler: Quoting lies will not hide the truth.
جناب عالی،میں ان کروڑوں پاکستانیوں میں سے ایک ہوں جن کی قسمت میں پاکستان کے ٹوٹنے کے تکلیف دہ مناظ۔
قیام پاکستان سے سقوظ ڈھاکہ تک بہت سے سیاسی اقدامات ہوں گے جن کی وجہ سے دونوں حصوں میں دوریاں پیدا ہوئیں ۔ مگروہ واقعات جو اس خونی تقسیم کا سبب بنے ان میں جناب بھٹو کے کردار کو نظر انداز نہیں کیا جا سکتا۔ سیدھی سی بات تھی ملک کی اکثریت نے حکومت کرنے کے لئے عوامی لیگ کو چنا تھا۔ بغیر کسی ہچکچاہٹ کے ان کے حق تسلیم کر لینا چاہیئے تھا۔ اس سے ماضی میں مشرقی بازو سے کی گئی نا انصافیوں کا ازالہ بھی ہو جاتا۔ مگر اسے تسلیم نہ کیا گیا۔
اس کے لئے ہمارے پاس کیا جواز ہے؟
کیا مشرقی پاکستان کے لوگ دوسرے درجے کے پاکستانی تھے؟
کیا مغربی پاکستان ان کا آقا تھا اور وہ غلام تھے کہ انہیں بلا شرکت اقتدار نہیں دیا جا سکتا تھا؟
If you were there as you claim, were you in favor of handing over government to Bengali????? Be honest. Secondly it wasn't ZAB's fault if Punjabis hated Bengali and treated them second class citizens. Thirdly again I ask you the same question I have asked a person who has closed his brain thinking and keeps on same rants as you are propagating. Why Yahya Khan did not ask Sh Mujib to form the government????????Don't give me a crape that ZAB ordered him not do so, though he was chparaasi of ZAB not the dictator ruling Pakistan.
^ As per your claim, Bhutto was the single most popular, decisive and influential leader of his time who could sway the public at any direction he desired. So why don't you just tell us the role Bhutto played to ensure Mujib gets his legitimate right to form the government? Go on. Really enough of your efforts to paint Bhutto as an undisputed saint. He was a human, politician and just as stubborn and hungry for power and fame as his only civilian rival he was up against.
Why don't you also tell us about all the private meetings Yahya Khan chaired between Bhutto and Mujib so they can settle on a solution? Army always preferred devolution of power and political solution over a war and a break up a country. Mujib also did not want to break the country as evidenced by his Six Point agenda. But guess what, we all which individual was dying to become the Prime Minister. You rather spew racist crap against half of Pakistan population just to protect a controversial personality.
Pakistan to went all unforgiving on Bengalis when it was established that India is involved and they want to separate at all cost. But do not deny the fact that efforts were not made to resolve this issue.
bhutto was cheapskate. he only started townships near karachi and that is his only achievement! as for india admitting break up of pakistan, they are our little brothers. our major brother china makes them say this, when i find pakistan clueless.
If you gonna go around saying how Yahaya Khan was a drunkard and a dimwit then also have the guts to admit that he naturally lacked all the abilities to handle shrewd and manipulative politicians like Bhutto and Mujib. He was simply outdone by a professional agitator and a power hungry feudal brat with massive sense of entitlement.
Not to mention, Bhutto was a darling of two dictators. He served as Foreign Minister under Ayub Khan. Unlike Mujib, he had a massive network of support within establishment who preferred to work with him over Mujib. Plenty of advisors around Yahya were supporters of Bhutto. In fact, it was his friends from intelligence that inflated his ego by installing the belief that he will win absolute majority without any hurdle in his way. He clearly wasn't expecting Mujib to sweep East Pakistan and have a legitimate claim to premiership. Of course, name and shame all the Punjabi generals who supported Bhutto.
Typical PPP style racism: Punjabis are all good when they repeatedly vote for Bhutto and his family again and again. But they are the root cause of all the problems when PPP stops getting votes from there or their Saint’s role in breaking up of Pakistan is remotely examined.
I dunno that quiz seems to be written by a ‘shagird’ of NFP !
I came out to be Benazir Bhutto which said in description that I am daring and take stands even if it means that I am all alone in making them?
**Seriously WTF !!? **When did benazir take such singular stands? Are we counting marrying Zardari instead of faisal saleh hayat or doing a NRO with “dictator Musharraf” as two stands? At least, put that in the original Bhutto’s profile as like him or not like him, he did take stands.
Pakistan is/was more homogeneous than India. Has mainly one religion. To screw up such a nation Pakistanis themselves are more responsible than India.
It is like us hating Chinese for exploiting Maoist situation when Naxalbari is completely Indian story.
But you do blame others and lets not forget Kashmir either. It is an irony that disputes in a disputed territory of kashmir is 'bad' yet interfering in East Pakistan was 'OK'.
It just proves that India would never be our friend or as they say, a country where we will aligned interests as there are no permanent friends in the world. I wouldn't trust them on cricket or any other matter. Trade with them but on Pakistan's term with no cheap indian dhumping of products.
I thought at least you wouldn't call a PPP guy biased. But I was wrong. No amount of truth can have an impact on blind worship.
And you consider him unbiased because he distributed the responsibility. Do you think Imran Khan is directly responsible for killing of 145 school children because of his sympathies and love for taliban??? He was/is still ruling KP and not working as adviser to any one.
And you consider him unbiased because he distributed the responsibility. Do you think Imran Khan is directly responsible for killing of 145 school children because of his sympathies and love for taliban??? He was/is still ruling KP and not working as adviser to any one.
This post is a goldmine for examples of logical fallacies. Thank you!!!
This post is a goldmine for examples of logical fallacies. Thank you!!!
Do you have knowledge of mathematical term 'analogy'???? If what you believe in making ZAB responsible than you should also believe what I am saying above. Otherwise your views about ZAB are either totally biased or lies.
I Pray Modi remains PM of India for another 10 years. Hasina remains PM of Bangladesh for next 10 years..
after ten years, we won't be needing big army or defense spending because, India will no longer be our neighbor........ most likely neighbor would be Khalistan, Rajistan and Gujrat...
Do you have knowledge of mathematical term 'analogy'???? If what you believe in making ZAB responsible than you should also believe what I am saying above. Otherwise your views about ZAB are either totally biased or lies.
Analogy is not a mathematical term. And thanks for the laughs. :-D
Analogy is not a mathematical term. And thanks for the laughs. :-D
Can you answer the following mathematical analogy? If not you can laugh at your ignorance: :)
Analogies require learners to use analytical skills.
To understand analogies, students should be familiar with vocabulary but must also understand relationships, such as comparing, contrasting, and sequencing.
In introducing a math lesson on analogies, you may wish to start with some simple examples from other disciplines, such as:
Hot is to Soup as Cold is to _____ .
4 : 12 :: 1 : _____ .
At least, put that in the original Bhutto’s profile as like him or not like him, he did take stands.