Re: Hindu-Muslim Bhai Bhai...
[QUOTE]
When there is 'Ram' in Ramzan and 'Ali' in Diwali why maintain the rift??
[/QUOTE]
If only religion was restricted to name of ocassions or months your idea would have been wonderful. Religion is deeper than names you know on both sides
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by yahudi: *
Dear Fayax,
“What has been happenig in India (because pakistan does not have many hindus) is a tit for tat.”
Given are your words.
Now pls refresh you gk. In 1947 the Muslim population in India was app 11% and In West Pakistan, that is today Pakistan, Hindu population was 7%.
Now what is your tit for tat theory, if in your present (West) Pakistan today Hindu population is around 1%, whereas in India the Muslim population has increased?
May be you will enlighten us why Hindus did not want to continue living with the followers of a good religion in Pakistan?
The fact is that wherever Muslims are in majority, the minority community starts migrating. What disturbs them? Hence yours is the best religion?
In this thread I was not at all interested in an encountering religious discussion. But Muslims cannot let go a single chance to qualify their religion.
Let us not raise up the disbeleiver issue......
[/QUOTE]
India as a country did not exist. It was an empire. Ruled by Mughals i.e Mulsims. India only came into existance as a country a day after Pakistan. So the talk about Muslims population before that date does not matter. In fact if it matters then Kashmir issue can be brought up but that is not this thread. India was a part of the Muslim Empire. Period.
So at that time the common enemy was the British. After the British, the animosity grew more because Mulsims separated. All I am saying is that if that animosity and hatred is due to political reasons maybe it is something that can be resolved. The religious matter are a never ending story. But as long as we hate Hindus just because they are hindus, and vice versa then instability in the area will hurt all of Paksitan and India and the surrounding countries.
:D
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Madhanee: *
Fayax, are you saying that Pakistan did not exist until Bangladesh was created? Do you know how old Mahabharata is? Take a wild guess. Conquerors did not come to invade GT Road, but India.
[/QUOTE]
I guess then the independece day for India should not be august 15 1947. ? warrant your arguments with facts please.
Hence there was no India as a country before that date.
Quit providing GT road analogies.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by fayax: *
I guess then the independece day for India should not be august 15 1947. ? warrant your arguments with facts please.
Hence there was no India as a country before that date.
Quit providing GT road analogies.
[/QUOTE]
do you accept pakistanis called themselves atleast punjabis before 1947.
punjabis is language that you cant hide it is real. why dont you accept what you are . there is nothing wrong being non-arab muslim.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Corporate Spy: *
Yes Munniji...Bullseye!Thats why I want the hatred should be eradicated from the beautiful world where as people should practice their respective religions with chastity.Yes...war can be started by people who are of same religion...coz the base of war is hatred and not religion basically.Religion is just one reason which mean people use as a medium to spark hatred.
[/QUOTE]
smile Thanks for replying.
dont forget the mauryans who ruled as much or more terrritory than aurangzeb.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by fayax: *
India as a country did not exist. It was an empire. Ruled by Mughals i.e Mulsims. India only came into existance as a country a day after Pakistan. So the talk about Muslims population before that date does not matter. In fact if it matters then Kashmir issue can be brought up but that is not this thread. India was a part of the Muslim Empire. Period.
So at that time the common enemy was the British. After the British, the animosity grew more because Mulsims separated. All I am saying is that if that animosity and hatred is due to political reasons maybe it is something that can be resolved. The religious matter are a never ending story. But as long as we hate Hindus just because they are hindus, and vice versa then instability in the area will hurt all of Paksitan and India and the surrounding countries.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by vivek: *
dont forget the mauryans who ruled as much or more terrritory than aurangzeb.
[/QUOTE]
well at some period during their reign.
Fayax, you have rejected gk, no problem.
Pls explain why it happens that wherever Muslims are in majority, the minority community starts migrating. What disturbs them? Hence yours is the best religion?
And you have made it an India Pakistan issue; Bhai-Bhai issue is over long back.
My dear Ms Nadia, It is always very nice to see that you have objection to some little, the rest do you accept?
By the way from all corners I fall into the category of disbelievers, like all non-Muslims in the world.
Pls enlighten us how Islam loves disbelievers. (Off course Islam is very fond of us, otherwise not every second or third verse could be attributed to us.)
Later I may ask you who hates whom?
With best rgds
**
Nice reply there, Spoon. :k: :k: Yahudi, Sorry i have nothing to new to state that i have not stated to you previously. Your hatred for Islam and Muslims has defeated my patience to explain this to you. More than anything, i feel sorry for anyone who has so much hatred/fear inside themselves. It makes you a prisoner inside yourself.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Madhanee: *
Fayax, are you saying that Pakistan did not exist until Bangladesh was created? Do you know how old Mahabharata is? Take a wild guess. Conquerors did not come to invade GT Road, but India.
[/QUOTE]
The invaders came to conquer Gandhara, Gedrosia, Hind(Panjab), Thatagu, but not India...
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by vivek: *
dont forget the mauryans who ruled as much or more terrritory than aurangzeb.
[/QUOTE]
Did any Mauryan ruler call himself the king of India?
Sind is the cradle of civilization…
Even Sindhi Hindus don’t buy your theory…
“The Indian hold on Sind began from the days of Delhi Sultanate but always remained casual, precarious and uncertain. Greek historians debated whether river Indus was the dividing line between Hind and Sind. The Persian and Arabian travellers and historian and geographers always emphasised that Indus valley formed the buffer zone between India and western countries. Moen-jo-Daro civilization is a non-Aryan civilisation and so different from other civilisations in India.”
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by yahudi: *
Dear Fayax,
“What has been happenig in India (because pakistan does not have many hindus) is a tit for tat.”
Given are your words.
Now pls refresh you gk. In 1947 the Muslim population in India was app 11% and In West Pakistan, that is today Pakistan, Hindu population was 7%.
Now what is your tit for tat theory, if in your present (West) Pakistan today Hindu population is around 1%, whereas in India the Muslim population has increased?
[/QUOTE]
Don't play the victim card, whatever happened during partition was wrong and shameful, both sides committd crimes. The partition of British India was actually the partition of Panjab and Bengal. The whole Panjab (pak. panjab, ind. panjab and haryana) got effected immensely by that event, muslims migrated from eastern panjab to western panjab and Hindus vice versa. Majority of indian muslims are living in those areas that didn't feel the heat of partition, tell me how many muslims are living in eastern Panjab and in Haryana today...
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by yahudi: *
Or have you read Quran of Muslims?
[/QUOTE]
And does quran teaches hatredness Mr??????
care to shed some light on ur view?
^^ Oh no, don’t get him started again . In my limited time i have learned a thing or two about yahudi there are only three ways about his discussion (if you can call it that) your opinion, my opinion and right opinion. Which is always his so 
PS:no offence to you ofcourse yahudi, may be you are just too intelligent for us.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by rvikz: *
do you accept pakistanis called themselves atleast punjabis before 1947.
punjabis is language that you cant hide it is real. why dont you accept what you are . there is nothing wrong being non-arab muslim.
[/QUOTE]
You are misleading yourself. Punjab was never a country and still is not. And neither was india before 1947. And I accept what I am . What in the world are you talking you ????
Yes, Paki, listen to Wise-one and don’t wakeup the sleeping devil!
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by fayax: *
I guess then the independece day for India should not be august 15 1947. ? warrant your arguments with facts please.
Hence there was no India as a country before that date.
Quit providing GT road analogies.
[/QUOTE]
Dear Fayax,independence day is 15th aug 1947 becoz India had been granted freedom by the British.This fact does not mean tht India didn't exist before '47.The islands of the West Indies are named such coz Columbus in a bid to reach India had found a different land...and so were named as India of the West (West Indies) and the american natives as Red Indians.I hope this is the evidence,enuff to trace back the existence of India.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Corporate Spy: *
Dear Fayax,independence day is 15th aug 1947 becoz India had been granted freedom by the British.This fact does not mean tht India didn't exist before '47.The islands of the West Indies are named such coz Columbus in a bid to reach India had found a different land...and so were named as India of the West (West Indies) and the american natives as Red Indians.I hope this is the evidence,enuff to trace back the existence of India.
[/QUOTE]
indonesia
East India southeastern Asia including India, Indochina, Malaya, & Malay Archipelago -- a chiefly former name