Hadith & Sunnah is forbidden by Quran

Re: Hadith & Sunnah is forbidden by Quran

I have not read all of the posts but got some idea what is being discussed by reading several of the posts.

What I see is two extremes of people.

1- Those who put all the weight on hadiths and then read Quran to understand Quran or religion.

2- Those who do not believe hadith at all.

There is no one I see here who disputes Quran as it is however.

(I have not included those who think Quran is not forever and can be interpreted according to the time and understanding/teaching/explanation of 'imams' for making it simple)

Surely you can find many hadith which do appear to contradict with each other. Some even conflict with Quranic verses.

What Quranist are saying that the problem of sects and conflicts are hadiths and their interpretations.

For all of us to be on same page, it probably is wise to take a middle ground.

Believe in Quranic verses and those hadits which are not in conflict with Quran.

I do think Quran should be the first but not the only source of religious understanding.

Some thoughts here for us to ponder.

1- Quran was promised to be preserved, not hadith. (Written in Quran itself-which some say is a circular argument)

2- Quran was spoken by an angel as Allah's words to the prophet.

3- Quran was written by human hands but they wrote and compiled it as best they could as God's own words. (First-person statements)

4- Quran is same everywhere.

5- No matter what anyone says, one thing is established. Hadiths are not the word of God.

6- Hence hadiths CAN be faked and even ulemas have questioned many ahadiths. Interested people can search the books written on weak or fake hadith lists.

I am not going to write those 'hadiths' since people may get bad feelings. Not my intention at all.

7- Bible is like Hadiths in Islam. A book full of third person statements.

8 (a)- Someone needs to confirm this but Bukhari wrote this book 'Zuafa-us-sagher' in which he even condemned narrators. Please let me know if I am wrong.

8 (b)- Many ahadiths are divided as weak, or Sahih or even fabricated. No one dare say same thing about Quranic verses. Even so called Sahih compilation books differ in their contents. Many version of 'Sahih' books are in the market.

9- Many many sectarian 'ulemas' tell general people hadiths which make no sense. With all due respect to sects, their basis IS definitely on hadiths and they just shy away from first explaining Quran to people before emphasizing one or several hadiths to make them their followers. It may not be their fault altogether, they learned these from their teachers or read selective books and hence regurgitated the same in front of masses.

A vast majority of people never open Quran let alone read/understand its translation, and only follow their 'ulemas' blindly thinkiing their job is done.

10- Finally, I would say we do not need to follow every hadith if it is way beyond common sense and absolutely not if it contradicts with Quran. Read and try to understand Quran first if anyone wants to be so religious.

Re: Hadith & Sunnah is forbidden by Quran

In the traditional Islamic circles Muslims are encouraged to learn about Islam from scholars of repute. Although we have the Qur'an and hadith at our fingertips today, we cannot make contextualised understandings without considering, timing, in case of abrogations, or context for specific cases which overrule the general cases and so on.

Many Sahih hadith are difficult to understand and their apparent meanings can be very contrary to the spirit of Islam, this is not grounds to reject the hadith rather it is grounds to seek clarification. For this reason we should not give ourselves the power to decide which does or does not contradict with the Qur'an, because in some cases it would need to conflict in order to come to a resolution in a certain matter.

a) Know the mechanism of hadith
b) Know the rules of hadith
c) Know when those rules do not apply

Many people have access to the first two points but a scholar will be able to say when c) becomes effective. If we cannot know any of the points then the simple thing is to go to a scholar of repute. Qur'an should be read by the awam for barakah and gaining surface meaning for pondering and reflection and if something is not fully understood to simply accept it and if possible to follow it up. The permission to discard hadith is not in the hands of the awam.

Peace Psyah!

With respect, not agreed with essence of your post here.

This is exactly muslims should be aware of and avoid.

Quran was not sent to Ulemas only.

Quran should be read by anyone who calls himself/herself muslim WITH meaning if not learned in Arabic.

Quran was not sent only to people who knew arabic language.

Ulems for centuries have created this 'fear' among people not to bother reading it or try to understand.

Reciting Quran in arabic may have barakah as some say but it just does not make sense to recite it like a parrot and not even trying to understand its meaning.

True everyone should try his/her best to learn arabic but if we boast on Quran to be for each and everyone on this earth to follow, then only few on this earth who can understand arabic from birth.

Hence reading its translation and its understanding by more than one people is must.

We know there are so called ulems who make people go stray and poor general people merely follow their twisted version of islam daily.

I am not saying discard all ulemas or translators or tafseers but what Iam saying is it is the individual's responsibility to search the best and keep mind open.

Blindly following another human no matter how much educated he/she is in arabic is like being a sheep following the first sheep in the row. What if this human is going to wrong path? It is called herd mentality.

He will go to his grave and all others to their.

You keep saying verses are taken out of context. The verses are self explanatory.

[9:31] They have set up their religious leaders and **scholars as lords*, instead of GOD. Others deified the Messiah, son of Mary. They were all commanded to worship only one god. There is no god except He. Be He glorified, high above having any partners.

[17:36] You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them.

[5:101] O you who believe, do not ask about matters which, if revealed to you prematurely, would hurt you. If you ask about them in light of the Quran, they will become obvious to you. GOD has deliberately overlooked them. GOD is Forgiver, Clement.

[6:19] Say, "Whose testimony is the **greatest?" Say, "GOD's.** He is the witness between me and you that this Quran* has been inspired to me, to preach it to you and whomever it reaches. Indeed, you bear witness that there are other gods* beside GOD." Say, "I do not testify as you do; there is only one god, and I disown your idolatry."

[6:114] Shall I seek other than GOD as a source of law, when He has revealed to you this book fully detailed?* Those who received the scripture recognize that it has been revealed from your Lord, truthfully. You shall not harbor any doubt.

[68:37] Do you have another book to uphold?
[68:38] In it, do you find anything you want?
**
[4:105] We have **sent down to you the **scripture
, truthfully, **in order to **judge among the people** ** in accordance with what GOD has shown you**. You shall not side with the betrayers.
The bottom line is that you chose not to listen to GOD words. Instead, you say you need context from other sources in order to understand the verses. Even though, the verses are very very clear.

peace
submitmj

Re: Hadith & Sunnah is forbidden by Quran

Peace diwana bro

From this response it is clear you have misunderstood my post. I always make mention of following a scholar of repute. I always urge people to learn Arabic and read Qur'an with meaning. To read translation is for accessing the surface meanings for most lay persons. They should stick to this level of understanding and read it regularly for barakah as it purifies the hearts.

People must seek companionship and association with people of knowledge so they can learn from their words, and actions there is a place for adab and suluk in Islam that can only be gained with interaction and that interaction with those who practice it best. The danger in reliance on translations and online hadith is that people can become very isolated from one another. Islam is a community lifestyle and we should maintain that.

Taking rulings and deeper meanings and deciding which hadith is in conflict or not with the Qur'an is the duty of ulema not of the awam. I stress again.

You are doing it again bro! I have some Christian evangelist associates and they can find a verse that they can pin on me. It's quite fun to see them do it, you are no different. Stop doing that please. You are in no authority to pin verses on me and you do so selectively ... there are other places within the Qur'an that show it is not so clear do draw meanings. I have no mind to show you, without doubt when you checked up your database for buzzwords you ignored those references that went against your intent.

Which verses are clear and which are not you can't say but those who have the supporting scriptures of Seerah and Sunnah they can.

You just proved that you reject the Quran and look to other sources of guidance besides the Quran.

I qualified that statement from the CLEAR VERSES IN THE QURAN. It says when the hypocrites ‘COME TO YOU’, meaning Muhammad. Why are they hypocrites? Because it is impossible to ‘bear witness’ to Muhammad’s messengership. They were not there in high heaven when GOD informed Muhammad he was a prophet. Hence, GOD knows those who say this statement are liars.

[63:1] When the hypocrites COME TO YOU they say, “We bear witness that you are the messenger of GOD.”* GOD knows that you are His messenger, and GOD bears witness that the hypocrites are liars.

In the 2nd verse it says ‘under the guise of their APPARENT faith’. Since, they are claiming to bear witness Muhammad is the messenger, it means their ‘APPARENT FAITH’ is Islam. And those ‘hypocrites’ repel from the path of GOD.

[63:2] Under the guise of their apparent faith, they repel the people from the path of GOD. Miserable indeed is what they do.

The 3rd verses says it is because they ‘believed, then disbelieved’. Since, you accept other sources of religious guidance your mind is blocked, you cannot understand.

[63:3] This is because they believed, then disbelieved. Hence, t**heir minds are blocked; they do not understand. **

The verses is clear. Hadith is not needed to understand these verses or any verses for that matter.

submitmj
](Chapter 63, The Hypocrites (Al-Munaafeqoon) Footnotes)

Peace Psyah!

Absolutely. This makes it much clear.

Just want to make sure we do not go over board with the bold part here.

Thanks. :-)

Your blind obedience to scholars and other sources of religious guidance is VERY apparent.

If GOD says "the Quran is easy to learn (54:17,22,32, 40)", it means exactly that. If GOD says he is the "teacher of the Quran (55:1-2)", it means exactly that. If GOD says only the Hypocrites say "we bear witness Muhammad is the Messenger of GOD", it means exactly that.

You can hide behind your ignorance of Quran all you want, but on the Day of Judgment the truth will be shown. You are waiting, we are all are waiting. We will surely find out who the truthful are from the liars.

submitmj

Re: Hadith & Sunnah is forbidden by Quran

The current situation is that there is too much reliance on 'ulemas', 'buzurgs' 'pir' 'Wali' or 'Maulvi' by a majority of people.

Most of source of info for people is friday Khutba, TV programs, Some local Mufti or Aalim or even a hearsy spread by grandma or grandpa.

People recite Quran without reading translations or tafseers. (Plural-not one translation or tafseer)

**A sawab of 10 deeds per word recited is portrayed and the action on these words? That is completely ignored or not promoted.

End result, uneducated muslims happy to follow a man all their life without checking to see if what they are doing is indeed correct.
**

These 'Ulemas' have shunned general people from even trying to learn the religion so they can keep their shop open and guide or misguide them whatever way they want.

Biggest mistake people make when they try to mix religion with medical knowledge and think these 'ulemas' are like the doctor.

It seems as if this false theory is also promoted by those who want people not to read scripture themselves.

Sects are created by many made up hadiths and sectarians have mostly these hadiths to 'bang the heads' of each other.

Peace submitmj

You only have blind obedience to Rashad Khalifa and if that is not true then show how you differ from him. You see each of us have our own scholars!

Now the Qur'an has never said that "the Qur'an is easy to learn" your references are fallacious in translation. So if the Qur'an did say this then it could mean that "we are allowed to understand it in the manner of our minds choosing" but then we would need to prove that if something is "easy to learn" it is also "readily understood by all minds in an objective manner". We have not even got that far ... because I don't agree that the Qur'an says that it is easy to "learn" as per the meaning in English.

All the Muslims bear witness that Muhammad (SAW) is the Messenger of God, it does not make them hypocrites unless the other criteria are fulfilled, which is that after saying that they do not obey him (SAW), they do not love and respect him (SAW) ... please read Surah Al-Kauthar.

Re: Hadith & Sunnah is forbidden by Quran

Dismissing hadith means saying that ALL great scholars and their teachers were nothing but cheaters and imposters , its just an underhanded way of attacking islam

i suggest readers familirize themselves that hadith masters were not merely story tellers but masters of their art ( we may disagree with them on some issues NO DOUBT but to dismiss them out of hand is amateurish )

I will start with HAKIM NAYSHAPURI
AL-HAKIM AL-NAYSABURI

I’m not attacking them. The Quran says very clearly not to set up your scholars are lords whom you think can guide you. ONLY GOD GUIDES. THIS IS A QURANIC FACT.

The art they are masters of was inspired by satan. Hadith and Sunnah DID NOT come from Prophet Muhammad’s mouth, the Quran did. GOD says not to follow any other source besides Quran. If you do, you are following satan, NOT GOD.

I will say it very openly. The Islamic scholars are corrupting Islam with their laws falsely attributed to GOD and HIS messenger. According to Quran, they are wicked. So, you can say that I am the one saying the Scholars are wrong, but the fact is, the Quran is saying NOT to follow any other source of religious guidance other than Quran, and NOT to set up the religious scholars as Lords. As well, we are COMMANDED in Quran to verify ALL. That means information from the so-called scholars too.

peace
submitmj

I have said it before, I will say it again. Hadith and Sunnah DID NOT come from Prophet Muhammad. They came from other people NOT authorized by GOD. If you want to obey lies attributed to Prophet Muhammad, that is your problem. Rashad Khalifa is a messenger of GOD and he came with irrefutable proof of messengership. He preached the worship of GOD alone and we know from Quran that a false messenger (messenger of satan) could NEVER advocate the worship of GOD alone. He neither would, nor could. This is right out of the Quran. Since Rashad Khalifa advocated the worship of GOD alone, it is impossible for him to be a dajjal.

peace
submitmj

This submitmj guy does not want to talk about their namaz, it is because of the amount messing up they have done with this prayer, just because it is not mentioned fully in Quran.
Namaz is an excellent example of why we need sunnat to perform it properly.

It is interesting that these munkireen e hadith consider ruku3 to be a part of namaz, even though Quran CLEARLY talks about Namaz/Salat and Ruku3 as separate ibadat/prayers.
Hence Quran talks about 'aqeemus salat wa aatuz zakat, war ka3u ma3ar raki3een'.
So in such aayats, Quran talks of Salat, Zakat, and RUKU3 seperately; thereby meaning that these are three SEPARATE ibadat!

What do munkireen e hadith/sunnat say about it? Is ruku3 a prayer different from salat?
Why not? If salat and ruku3 are mentioned separately then they should be separate prayers.

Re: Hadith & Sunnah is forbidden by Quran

Quran is word of Allah by default. (Some verses do talk about different messages separately on different locations. For example about alcohol). True.

Hadiths are words of human. Many are fake, having no sense or contradictory. True.

Allah >>>>>>>> (infinity)>>> Human.

(Who is this Rashad by the way? )

Re: Hadith & Sunnah is forbidden by Quran

:k:

The cat is finally out of the bag “Rashad Khalifa” is a messenger of God now according to submitmj. Subhan Allah!

What next? He gets revelations which are definately more authentic than hadith? :slight_smile:

Dajjal’s mission is to misguide, mislead, and most important of all lead astray people by weakening their imaan and their religious beliefs which are rooted in Quran, first and foremost, and Sunnah as a guide to living (living according to Quran).

How convenient would it be if Dajjal could make muslims believe that Sunnah and Hadith are mumbo jumbo, and everyone can make their own interpretation of Quran or better yet believe in the miracle of 19 by yours truly, Rashad Khalifa.

Dajjal and its agents/minions would love to take atleast one of those away, the rest is half faith and half faith is easier to defeat than full faith. That is why those with the weakest imaan would be in the row of followers of Dajjal. Master of deception.

Furthermore, it’s hypocrisy at its highest. We’re being told not to take others words as it is not authorized by Allah, and in the same breath being advocated the “interpretation” of some unknown man, and we’re meant to take his word as being superior to Hadiths of learned scholars who spent their lives studying the religion and scrutinizing the hadiths to ensure their authenticity.

Allahu Akbar i say :slight_smile:

We should all read Aoozubillah everytime we enter this thread, seriously.

INNA LILLAHE WA INNA ELAIHE RAJEOÓN! At last this person (submitmj) came out after 200 posts in this thread, claiming this Dajjal, imposter Rashed Khalifa as MESSENGER of Allah(SWT).

These shiateen would start to have an excuse first to claim something. Like they say because Hadiths are from the prophet and hair say thats why they are corrupted, TO MAKE THEIR WAY TO FULFIL THEIR DESIRES.

http://www.quransearch.com/rk_cult_exposed.htm
Rashad Khalifa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don’t know how these people are believing these imposters? Do they not have an atom of brains in their skulls…OR they are the same agents flourishing on somebody’s money to create RIFT in Islam??? not necessarily believing what Rashad Mardood is telling.

How can I believe in a person who is charged with sexual assault with a minor… I really doubt those people’s sanity who believe in such imposters.

Why should Rashad be a messenger anyways? I never heard of Rashad Khalifah till recently. His 19 code was made famous by Ahmad Deedat. Anyways everyone should provide evidence from the Quran. I am not sure what is meant by messenger here.

Anyways in the end people should follow those who bring forth evidence from the Quran. Rashad or whoever is not the author of the Quran. Sunnis and Shias must also pledge loyalty to the Quran and abandon this notion that traditions takes precedent over Quran.

There is a lot of people who would manipulate religion for their own purposes so strict observance to the Quran is needed in all situations. This is the straight path.

You must be careful when interpreting the Quran linguistically. This is because the Quran uses variant languages when addressing issues. i have seen many people do that and end up being contradictory. Its always best to interpret the Quran based on context and cross referencing with the rest of the Quran.

I like to interpret the Quran by meaning and context and look at the rest of the Quran to get an understanding. The Quran is not a normal book and its use of language is unique. This is the same mistake Sunnis do when they seperate God from messenger or the Quran from wisdom. They end up contradicting themselves since to obey God and His messenger can only bepossible if there is agreement between the two and not contradiction. Thats why Sunnis say the Sunnah abrogates the Quran, this way they end up following the Sunnah but not the Quran. You can't follow two contradictory injunctions so they end up abandoning the Quran. And thats not cool.