Re: Espresso Lahore protest
As I stated previously and will repeat for the sake of enlightenment, people on GS have prayed at that specific cafe. Restaurant all across the country offer such facilities. I have availed such facilities. So its the norm. And the issue of the law is not on intrinsic to Pakistan. Rather a US centric view point.
The people disagreeing with the lady have more in common with Paris Hilton than Pakistan.
That you and others have prayed at similar establishments is irrelevant. I'm not disputing that it's the norm. I'm stating that you can't enforce a norm.
The law is not a US centric notion. It is present in the Quran, and has been a fixture of society for thousands of years. It constitutes what a citizen, or establishment, can or can't do.
She can't sue so she protested, childish as it was, and was met with backlash **from her peers. **Since you insist in bringing the legitimacy of citizenship-based-on-class into the equation, I should add that the woman herself is one of the privileged few, able to patronize said cafe, and organize an online protest. How Facebook of her.
My comments were not directed at those who consider both parties of the conflict as idiots. Which they are. They are specifically to those who consider this a non-issue. In Pakistan the norm is to pray where you are. If you disagree that is your choice but that doesn't make it wrong. Which is exactly what Ghost and Southie et al have stated.
I believe I am one of those who consider both parties at fault. Below is my original response. The only way for the woman to be at fault, is if she was being unreasonable. She can only be considered unreasonable, if you recognize the fact that her issue is trivial because a) there is no law requiring what she demands and b) she can easily go somewhere else to pray. If you consider protesting against a norm to be reasonable, then the woman is not at fault, and you are blaming the restaurant. You are also agreeing with Bill O, who claims that "Happy Holidays" replacing "Merry Christmas" is a "war on Christmas" because it *goes against the norm. *
^ You're missing the point. Both sides are being over zealous but unless there is a law requiring the restaurant to provide a prayer room, she has no right to demand one. It doesn't matter if it's a Muslim country, no law, no obligation. If that upsets anyone, they can show their displeasure by taking their business elsewhere.
I know you tend to get sidetracked within your own thoughts, so I've highlighted the important point above. Please don't go tripping shrooms on me.