See, you too believe that world takes Nawaz's speech seriously because he met Raheel before leaving.
Its not about UNO only. We need courageous leadership. But if politicians rely on aids how can you expect they will meet the expectations of the nation.
Also the argument that democracy didnt get enough time in Pakistan to make us a developed nation makes no sense. As long as democracy is in the control of feudals you cannot expect something from democracy. Time is no guaranty to success but effort is, a revolutionary effort for providing people education. These feudal do every single thing to keep nation ignorant.
If military is so anti-feudal, then why hasn't it abolished it in its rule instead of becoming a feudal elites itself?
My take is that the military really doesn't want to buck the system too much since a powerful and clean system would audit the military itself. Iss hammam may sab nangay hain.
^ I didnt say army is anti feudal, they are not backing feudal either.
Yes, army would not make you a system which will have a check upon them, politicians have to do it. infact, system is in place, only honest leadership is needed.
Yes, Nawaz sharif received UN speech from GHQ hours before his speech.
i mean why is it not obvious, Army general commutes or orders execution of people. He makes policies, he launches operations etc. I doubt he will follow orders if NS asked him to attack india or shoot down drones. but at the same time NS will do whatever RS wants
Yes, Nawaz sharif received UN speech from GHQ hours before his speech.
i mean why is it not obvious, Army general commutes or orders execution of people. He makes policies, he launches operations etc. I doubt he will follow orders if NS asked him to attack india or shoot down drones. but at the same time NS will do whatever RS wants
For the lust of power and money N$ can do anything. Even he is prepared to work as 'chaprasi' and sit outside of CAOS office.
yes he is doing a great job with the security situation but at the same time he has taken full control of foreign affairs. is this also part of his job? That PMLN may not be a competent govt is not the right answer to justify army's strategy to control department of foreign affairs...at least not per our constitutional framework but if our army cannot live without controlling foreign affairs, why not make it constitutional and give them a legal seat at BOD level.
Fair point. I was giving input in regard to the question in thread title in that the military was significantly more dominant in the past and that in recent years due to the opening of the media and public activism they would have to think twice before any military takeover or grabbing power.
With regard to COAS, yes as head of the army its their duty to defend internal and external security, but not interfere in domestic or foreign policy and let the institutions function in this evolving democratic setup.
I disagree, a constitutional amendment would give way and the system would remain status quo hostage to one entity.
