Re: Does the military still control Pakistan?
You're obviously a good guy but my word that is an unbelievably clueless post. Giving solid competition to TheRealDeal's lying and Sachaydino there my friend.
"Properly trained for 2 weeks", did that training include mending fences with Russia to an extent no one could have imagined? Or entering this project with China which should bring us a shedload of money and increase our credibility on a global level? Or cleaning up Karachi? Or pretty much getting rid of TTP?
If the military wants to bring down the current government they could literally have it done within the next ten minutes. LITERALLY. No "training" of whether to do it or not required, no permission required. He went on a long tour to the US because they need us as much as we need them and they know the army is the ONLY institution worth talking to in Pakistan. Should they speak about Afghanistan to Nawaz Sharif, who I'm sure would promptly bring out his little notepad.
All this army bashing - especially against the current regime - is truly laughable and shows a complete lack of self-thought and the ability to form your opinion, instead resorting to spouting the bull**** rhetoric that has been fed to you over the past half decade by the media. Put your party allegiances to one side, open your eyes and then tell us whether you can honestly not see that for the first time in decades we have some genuinely good guys leading the military?
If you can't, then well wake up. Pakistan comes first - if someone has done something good, praise them, if they haven't and are sucking the country dry - call them out on it.
Excellent, excellent post.
You simply need to expose their hypocrisy. This whole meddling into 'civilian affairs' is a smokescreen created by PMLN, MQM and PPP. It is basically a coded opposition for NAP which has entered second phase that concerns with political financing of terror.
They are simply hypocrites. For years they cried that Pakistan has no terror fighting policy. Army comes with NAP which includes punishing political and religious abettors and facilitators of terrorism, everyone says Amen. But when they realise that Army was indeed serious and a lot of criminal politicians can possibly face some accountability under NAP. They start panicking and start coming up with propaganda of "Army meddling in Civilian affairs" or Army calling coup any weekend. It doesn't take a genius to figure out why MQM and PPP supporters have started singing along this tune, when only a year ago they supported NAP.
But I think Army would have been perfectly aware what kind of propaganda and smear campaign they would face the day they would start working on certain sections of NAP.
Those who couldn't stand "man in uniform" being turned into hero are the same who wouldn't tolerate Imran's popularity even years before dharna. So God knows who they want to see popular in Pakistan? Nicki Minaj? Amir Liaqat? You stopped producing good sporting heroes long time ago.
They can't just say that oh I like RS, but I can't see him becoming so popular. I believe in 'institutions' yada yada yada. You cannot tolerate priase for military (which is an institution) simple as that. This is just serious chip in the shoulder mentality. It is not just RS, General Nasser Janjua, General Naveed Mukhtar, DG Rangers Bilal, General Asim Bajwa are all way more respected and popular than your ministers like Parvez Rasheed, rigging champions Saad Rafiq, Kh Asif and Ayaz Sadiq.
Pakistanis are not stupid. They know how to appreciate performances and effective leadership. Actions speak louder than fuddy duddy rhetoric of institutions.
I think at the end of the way one will have to take Iconoclast's post in account, where he said you get out of GS, you won't a single Pakistani who does not appreciate Gen Raheel and military's performance. The General has one year left, he may or may not get extension. But those who have massive chip on the shoulder against military will find a way to make him so controversial, the campaign gets even more intense when their corrupt politucal leaders face even a grain of pressure of accountability. They simply pull the alarm of military interfering in civilian affairs, and see how their lackeys do the dirty work.