Do philosophical theories

Re: Do philosophical theories

Boss I am in mood for little biology lesson.

Once I spoke hospital emergency staff. They had tales to tell about gays.
Since they can go only so far in pleasure. They invented ways. One of them them was put rat in condom put some cocaine, then put it where sun dont shine.

Other day on I heard show about transgander , and their "medical transition" to their "real self".
I mean I grew up peeking at fathers surgery books, but that **** on radio was sick!!
Just too ugly.

Dont quote.

Re: Do philosophical theories

This is scary :(

Re: Do philosophical theories

Boss those words from "treatment" and having fun as real "self" were more scary then any thing i ever say in medical books.

Re: Do philosophical theories

I am beginning to notice you are excellent at NOT answering simple and direct questions. My request - could you please answer the questions I posed directly and honestly? That is all I ask. If you can't do that , could you state directly that you can't or won't answer the questions.

Also , anyone else is welcome to answer those questions I posed to Monk.

let us get to the root of this. Should we stand by when someone lies abt homosexuality being equivalent to pedophilia and bestiality?

Re: Do philosophical theories

Repeat post.

Re: Do philosophical theories

That would be your opinion. Does not mean you are right. And that the rest of us are confused.

In fact, some of us (at least myself) believe such attitude need condemning. And not homosexuals or homosexuality.

Re: Do philosophical theories

that woiuld be bohtan, oine of the big sins.Should not accuse people.

Re: Do philosophical theories

I assume bothan in some language means accusing people.

Work with me here Monk. We r making progress.

Did you mean WRONGLY accusing people?

Also ur response can be interpreted two ways (khuda ka shukar hai ke only two ways)

1) The person who made the false accusation is committing bothan
2) I am committing bothan by accusing the above person.

Which one did you mean?

That would be your opinion. Does not mean you are right. And that the rest of us are confused.

In fact, some of us (at least myself) believe such attitude need condemning. And not homosexuals or homosexuality.
[/quote]

I can’t argue with you if you shun facts away as someone’s opinion. Your bum hole is not designed for sexual activity. Now if you call it my opinion then it’s your problem, not mine.

Re: Do philosophical theories

No, such attitudes are society's problem. Neither yours or mine exclusively.

I don't consider this an argument. Just an attempt to get to the bottom of why decent people would not protest some of the nasty false equivalences spread in this thread. While you wouldn't do that, to me silence, in the face of such lies, if not as bad, is still bad.

As for what is natural and what is not, those are for the most part simply opinions. Progressive folks have led the way in Society accepting homosexuality as natural for those who are of that orientation. And as time marches on, those who think otherwise probably would be "shunning" the facts.

Anyway, thanks for allowing such discussions. That's why I hold you in high regard (not that anyone needs a certificate from me).

Re: Do philosophical theories

calling a simple cute gay, paedophile is bohtan.

Re: Do philosophical theories

I havenot read the whole thread. I probably read the first page, and then jumped in last few posts. Just picked random comments, and if did not reply to many, then it does not mean that I am agreeing with them or anyone, so its not my silence but the fact that I have not gone through every post.

Re: Do philosophical theories

Fair enough. My bad.

FYI - there is a post or posts that equates homosexuality with pedophilia and bestiality.

Re: Do philosophical theories

In ur own unique way, you restored my faith in humanity.

Re: Do philosophical theories

I saw that and respond to that

[QUOTE]

Incest may be, but child porn and bestiality are not a victim less crime. So you cant gel that in this example.
[/QUOTE]

Re: Do philosophical theories

I wonder why 1500 species practice this unnatural sexual behavior. if homosexuality is unnatural, then so is oral sex that heterosexuals indulge in, and so is masturbation. birth control is also very unnatural.
and even if something is indeed ‘unnatural’ to someone, why does it need condemnation? no one has yet shown how homosexuality has caused ANY danger or harm to the society? why does harmless thing need such hostility? IMO, you can only condemn what is harmful, things like murder, theft, taking away someones rights etc..

1,500 animal species practice homosexuality

Re: Do philosophical theories

I didn't understand your response. Incest is not a victim less crime. Neither is child porn. Both are terrible acts.

Also the post equating that act with pedophilia and bestiality was different I think. It directly attached the community. Will try to find it.

Re: Do philosophical theories

Post 136 equated homosexuality with bestiality

Re: Do philosophical theories

Post 124 brings up pedophilia

Re: Do philosophical theories

I’ve already answered this …

Animals go around naked, kill and eat flesh without cooking it, have homosexual sex out of dominance … look people can follow the animals if they like - but we ought to get our examples from the best humans not from animals … We follow the prophets of God.

The percentage of animals that do this is small compared to all animals something like 0.1% and even if they all did this - it does not justify the practice for us … who have greater sense and ought to have greater control over our urges.

I don’t know what the medical implications are for this either …

The fact is there are lures like traps set in this world … and from a religious point of view some natural things are to be confirmed and other ones are to be subdued …