Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur’an and obvious blunders

Agreed with above but you have left out the hadith and the Sunnah of the Prophet (saw) I suspect that it was calculated/ intentional move on your part and not an oversight.

muhkamat ayat are very clear whereas mutashabihat ayat are not; so they can have many meanings. If meanings are assigned to them, this must be done in a manner that complies with the language and the Religion, and does not contradict the ayat that are muhkamat. We all agree that the ayat of the Qur’an do not contradict one another. Likewise, the ahadith of the Prophet, (saw) do not contradict one another, and they do not contradict the ayat of the Qur’an.

So the mutashabihat ayats can ONLY understood in line with hadith and not that the Pseudo-Rationality of some later days wannabes/pretenders!

He it is Who has revealed the Book to you; some of its verses are decisive, they are the basis of the Book, and others are allegorical; then as for those in whose hearts there is perversity they follow the part of it which is allegorical, seeking to mislead and seeking to give it (their own) interpretation. but none knows its interpretation except Allah, and those who are firmly rooted in knowledge say: We believe in it, it is all from our Lord; and none do mind except those having understanding. Al Imran: ayah 7

Clearly the Quran has warned that only those who have perversity in their hearts will use their OWN RATIONAILTY to interpret these ayats to fit their nefarious agendas.

We have enough hadith material to debunk the claims of Jamaat Ahmadiya and its founder.

That’s the reason you left out the hadith of the Prophet (saw) in interpreting the mutashabihat ayats !!!

You lie when say that “, Ijma of as-sahabah.. the first ijmah as we know it was that all prophets before Muhammad pbuh had died”. Please show me where have you got these from that what you claim.

It is ijmah of the Sahabah is what the Orthodox Muslims believe in that Prophet Isa (as) was taken up ALIVE and will descend when Allah (swt) wills in Damascus – certainly not in Punjab.

Yes Logic and Rationality is used in Ijtihad and Qiyas only after having referred first to the Quran, then ahadith and Ijmah as-Sahabah. It is poor forth in line.

Believe me brother psyah is doing very well he doesn’t need my help. I admire his endurance and tenacity in addressing all you have ‘thrown’ to him. And your doggedness in refusing to face the facts is in also in notice.

I don’t know what’s your problem with ‘there are exceptions’!

It is Allah’s Sunnah to have exceptions in His creation.

Let me give you some examples:

All mammals are land based but we have Whale living solely in water.
All mammals walk on the land but we have bats that fly
All mammals give live birth but we have following mammals that lay eggs - platypus short-beaked echidna and long-beaked echidna.
Nearly all the plants (trees included) ‘feed’ via roots and the exception being the Carnivorous plants

Now in human terms let me give few examples which you won’t deny.

Human is born when male and female ‘meet’. Exception being:

Hz. Adam (as) Allah (swt)Willed him to be.
Hz. Huwaa (ra) was created from rib of Hz. Adam (as)
Hz. Isa (as) was born without the ‘agency’ of a father.

All the humans will taste death once – exception being those whom Hz. Isa (as) brought to life once they had tasted death with Allah (swt)’s Will – these people then tasted death at the appointed time. So they tasted death twice.

Human children learn to speak well with authority when 6 or 7 years old – Hz. Isa (as) spoke well when he was only few hours old to defend honour of his blessed mother.

Allah says: "Indeed your Lord is the Doer of what He wills" [Sûrah Hûd: 107] and “(He is the) Doer of what He wills.” [Sûrah al-Burûj: 16]

Keep the above ayahs in mind and tell me – Is it impossible for Allah (swt) to take a Human alive to heaven?

Keep in mind that Allah (swt) does make exceptions.

Understandably, Ahmadiyah need Hz. Isa (as) to be dead; then only someone else can ‘come’ in for him – That’s the main game plan. Dead Hz. Isa (as) serves Ahmadiyah philosophy to be legitimate.

I think he got bored trying so hard to put ‘some sense’ into some mind that’s air-tightly closed. :wink: It was amazing that he went that far. What an effort. Looks like you are claiming a victory??? :smack:

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur’an and obvious blunders

:smack:

you should make this move above in real life, maybe your airtight mind will finally get some air to give me an answer to this:

“Verily, messengers before Muhammad (saw) have passed away.”

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

Does it say all the messengers passed away?

Please give me evidence of the above from any hadith book that it Ijmah as-Sahabah that Hz. Isa (as) had died. Hadith material is full with second coming of Hz. Isa (as).

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur’an and obvious blunders

like thinking theyve killed Isa ibn Maryam Alaihis salam
:facepalm:

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

Do not question what was or what was not in my heart. Sure, put hadith in my reply as well. Ahadith are important. We do not 'deny' hadith. Dont say that our understanding of ahadith means 'denying' ahadith. There is difference in that.

We interpret mutashabihat verses in accordance to the mohkam verses of Quran. It is not me, but rather you, who make their own interpretation of verses without taking into account what mohkam verses has to say about certain topic.. I gave you an example and that's what im still stuck at.. >>Qur'an says that Earth is an abode for mankind. Now this is clear. Mutashabihaat verses as you said could have many meanings.. but they cannot go against the very fundamental beliefs of Quran. Again, see whose heart has perversity. I use rationality because it is required for me to interpret it according to mohkam verses of Quran. We are not taking out different meaning. We are merely telling you that this is what Quran says.. this is what this mutashbihaat verses should be interpreted like, nothing against it.

[QUOTE]
That’s the reason you left out the hadith of the Prophet (saw) in interpreting the mutashabihat ayats !!!!!
[/QUOTE]

Sorry!. Include hadith too. See if it helps you strengthening your point of view :) But keep in mind, mutashabihaat verses should FIRST be interpreted in accordance to mohkam verses, then to understand them better, we look in ahadith.

[QUOTE]
You lie when say that “, Ijma of as-sahabah.. the first ijmah as we know it was that all prophets before Muhammad pbuh had died”. Please show me where have you got these from that what you claim.

It is ijmah of the Sahabah is what the Orthodox Muslims believe in that Prophet Isa (as) was taken up ALIVE and will descend when Allah (swt) wills in Damascus – certainly not in Punjab.

Yes Logic and Rationality is used in Ijtihad and Qiyas only after having referred first to the Quran, then ahadith and Ijmah as-Sahabah. It is poor forth in line.
[/QUOTE]

No. I do not lie. I could be wrong. But i m not lying. Theres a difference. If i'm knowingly hiding the truth, then im lying. If I'm telling you what I believe is right from all my heart, even if im wrong, then i could be wrong, but not a liar. Hope you keep that in mind the next time you call me wrong or liar.

This is what your problem is. Whatever goes against your belief, you question it knowing that it is a well established facts and many many of your scholars have agreed upon it. But no, just to go against us, you even go as far as questioning your own beliefs. Ok well, to remind you of that instance when prophet muhammad pbuh died, it was abu bakr r.a who came out to the rest of sahabah and said the verse in which it says that verily prophets before him have passed away, so if he s.a.w pass away, will you turn your heels back on Him? We find that all sahabah knew about this verse and knew the meaning of verse to mean that all prophets died and muhammad pbuh died the same way. Read upon that instance and let me know if there was even a ONE sahabah who said no, wait! if jesus is still alive, so can Muhammd pbuh, or anything like that and i'll for sure look into that.

[QUOTE]
Believe me brother psyah is doing very well he doesn’t need my help. I admire his endurance and tenacity in addressing all you have ‘thrown’ to him. And your doggedness in refusing to face the facts is in also in notice.

I don’t know what’s your problem with 'there are exceptions'!

It is Allah’s Sunnah to have exceptions in His creation.

Let me give you some examples:

All mammals are land based but we have Whale living solely in water.
All mammals walk on the land but we have bats that fly
All mammals give live birth but we have following mammals that lay eggs - platypus short-beaked echidna and long-beaked echidna.
Nearly all the plants (trees included) ‘feed’ via roots and the exception being the Carnivorous plants

Now in human terms let me give few examples which you won’t deny.

Human is born when male and female ‘meet’. Exception being:

Hz. Adam (as) Allah (swt)Willed him to be.
Hz. Huwaa (ra) was created from rib of Hz. Adam (as)
Hz. Isa (as) was born without the ‘agency’ of a father.

All the humans will taste death once – exception being those whom Hz. Isa (as) brought to life once they had tasted death with Allah (swt)’s Will – these people then tasted death at the appointed time. So they tasted death twice.
[/QUOTE]

I dont know what is so fascinating about psyah's response that you do not even feel the need to add on anything. All he does is make exceptions and says Allah can do everything. Sure he can, but he doesnt do what he himself have told that He will not do. I HAVE problem with you people making exceptions. Why should I not? Then you tell me we go after mutashabihaat verses? tell me who goes after them to fit their agendas? Certainly i'm not. Tell me any verse which goes against my belief of humans being able to live only on Earth? Creating exceptions means you my friend are the one who likes to fit your agenda because you just dont want to see the whole quran. One verse and tadaa!! that is the belief..because you have been told so!

Ok. Your exceptions were good :) How about you make exceptions in the verse which says 'therein shall you live, therein shall you die, and therein shall you be brought forth" 7:25. I tried my best to create exceptions which is why i wrote reply with exceptions in post #42. Kindly do look into it.

[QUOTE]
Human children learn to speak well with authority when 6 or 7 years old – Hz. Isa (as) spoke well when he was only few hours old to defend honour of his blessed mother.

Allah says: "Indeed your Lord is the Doer of what He wills" [Sûrah Hûd: 107] and "(He is the) Doer of what He wills." [Sûrah al-Burûj: 16]

Keep the above ayahs in mind and tell me – Is it impossible for Allah (swt) to take a Human alive to heaven?

Keep in mind that Allah (swt) does make exceptions.
[/QUOTE]

Allah's laws are absolute. When he make laws, he does not break it for anyone!. Allah says that he is capable of doing 'what he wills'. We as humans are not. It is impossible for us to 'will' something and make it happen. In contrary, allah says when 'he wills' something, theres nothing stopping him. Allah also says that you will not see any change in his sunnah. There are many instances in which Allah refuted things he could have done for his messengers. i.e : make moses ummati of muhammadi shariya. >> answer was, no Muhammad pbuh is AFTER you and you are BEFORE him, however in heaven i'll join you all. Another was when disbelievers asked muhammad pbuh to bring down a book from heaven. Allah could have taken him to heavens and given him something to show to disbelievers. But no, Allah told muhammad pbuh to tell them that Allah is paak from this, meaning he does not break his laws. It does not need amendments and changes. What kind of logic do you give me, really!? If so and so can happen, why cant this happen? So and so happened because its in Quran... so and so cannot happen because Quran does not approve of it. As simple as that. Poor argument that this can also happen.. What i find rather funny is .. we have had stories of other religion of some of their saint or their leader going up to heavens or go in ghaib.. it has always been them going.. but how ironic is this that none has ever returned. Everyone goes, no one comes back!

[QUOTE]
Understandably, Ahmadiyah need Hz. Isa (as) to be dead; then only someone else can ‘come’ in for him – That’s the main game plan. Dead Hz. Isa (as) serves Ahmadiyah philosophy to be legitimate.
[/QUOTE]

Sure. We dont need it. Quran and Allah announces it. You cannot take one verse, interpret it your own way and then close your eyes on the rest of Quran, and keep creating exceptions so that your interpretation of one verse remains intact. Whose doing pick and choose? I'm offering the entire Quran whereas you give me one verse telling me this is the proof of His ascension?

Alhamdulillah, we speak with evidence. You can keep trying to refuse these evidences, but you're not refusing us, but rather refusing Allah's words. You do NOT have to be an ahmadi once you accept isa a.s death. You do not. But just to have enmity against jamaat e ahmadiyya, you are closing your eyes on evidences. If I keep giving you one verse after another, I assure you, you will have a very hard time not to believe in them. It is just one verse that i'm arguing about.. i got plenty plenty more.. with lots and lots of questions with every single verse..all questions based on Quran. I assure you, either you will keep bringing exception in it, or your last answer will be Allah can do everything. Alhamdulillah, like allah says, truth has come and falsehood has vanished away. Surely falsehood vanish away fast.

Again, 'therein shall you live'. Make exception in it and tell me what you can come up with.

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

Before I say anything on what you have stated, could you give us a crash course on the use of 'Kul'. Specifically, usage of 'Kul' when it always means 'All' under the given scope and when it means 'some' and not All. OR is it always upto the user to improvise this way or that way. You have stated positioning of 'Kul' is important. is this the only determining factor? How about the verse-fragment 'INALLAh HA ALA KULI SHAIN QADEER'? Should we expect exceptions in this case as well?

Also, Why you always demand 'Kul' to mean 'All' when you yourself have tried to show that it could mean otherwise. For 'All', 'Kul' is not always necessary. You know that very well. For instance, 'Rab un Naas' (sustainer of ALL the people , 'Rab ul Aalameen' (sustainer of All the worlds). 'All' is implicit in these statements. There are other examples as well.

Now for 51:49,

[QUOTE]

051.049
YUSUFALI: And of every thing **We have created pairs: That ye may receive instruction.
**PICKTHAL:
And all things **We have created by pairs, that haply ye may reflect.
**SHAKIR:
And of everything We have created pairs that you may be mindful.

[/QUOTE]

seems like yusuali, pickthal and shakir are also lacking in their knowledge of Arabic and need a crash course from you.

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

Peace kchughtai

I would love to give you a crash course ... But do i really need to spend all this time teaching you Arabic?

Look I'm at intermediate level and I'm a learner, so despite being reluctant ... I'll put down a few pointers and you can investigate further the truth of what I say ... I think that is the best compromise.

There are several Arabic emphasises ... Two of them are Inna and Kullu ... Inna behaves like f'il naqis or a weak verb ... It turns the mubtada in a nominative sentence from rafa'a state to nasb state. So if I say "Anta Talibun jadeedun ( you are a new student)," it has no emphasis, but with Inna ... It becomes innaka Taliban jadeedan ...Verily you are a new student... Notice Talibun becomes Taliban and Anta is dropped for the dhameer ka ...

Inna has a 4 times power of emphasis ... Kullu has 2 times .. When used in the right way ...

Now Arabic also groups collectives and makes them into singular terms in the feminine ... It is like object orientated programming ... Oh gotta dash ... Next post I'll give the rest ...inshaAllah

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

Ok where was I?

Yes ... In programming we can declare a class and we can give it several attributes - then we can also decalre a class made of of several classes and the way we deal with it is exactly the same as we would deal with any other class.

This also happens in English language ...

There are some words that are "names of groups" such as "school" or "XYZ group" or "The Muslim Group" - In Arabic Muslimoona - is translated as The Muslims - but effectively it behaves as "The Muslim Group" ...

Similarly "KulluShay" - means 'everything' but behaves as grammatically as "The Group in which All Things are Contained" ...

Now if we say "This is the best performing school" - we are saying "overall this school has the best average results" because members of this school i.e. the pupils some will be out performing others ...

When it is said in Surah 51 Verse 49 - "Wa Min Kulli Shayin Khalaqna Zawjaini" it means "And from (the Group of) all things We Created mates in pairs ... here it is evident that "ALL" is not qualifying the extent of the Creating act. The harf (Min) is actually qualifying a special case of the genus of "all things" that are Created as the pairing of mates.

In the verse "InnAllaha 'Ala KulliShayin Qadeer" - The KulluShayin again is not operating as the emphasis ... The harf ('Ala) means over ... Without Inna the verse would go ... "Allahu 'Ala KulliShayin" - This means "Allah has power over (The Group of) all Things ... again you see Kullu here does not play the role of emphasis ... Rather when Inna is used ... that is where the emphasis is coming from ...

Verily (x4) Allah (SWT) has Power over (The Group of) all Things ...

Or Allah (SWT) has Power over the group and each individual of that group at every level of all things ... notice we understand this has no exception because of (INNA) not because of the word (KULLU) ...

So in both cases KULLU is not qualifying the verb as an emphasiser ... so when does it qualify as an emphasiser?

Kullu qualifies as an emphasiser when it operates as "Ta'keed" - In English we would write the sentence like this:

"Those people are fools - all of them"

Here the word 'all' IS behaving with emphasis ... it means that there is no exception of the people behaving like fools ...

I'll give an Arabic sentence to illustrate and these can also be found in the Holy Qur'an too ...

"Hadarat Tullaabu KulluHum" - Meaning "ALL the students attended" - Literally "Were Present The Students - All of Them"

Neither Kullu nor Inna occur in Verse 7:25

In Arabic is goes:

"Qala feeha TaHyawna wa feeha TaMuToona ..." He Said ...In it (Earth) you (plural) will dwell and in it you (plural) die ...

This is why in this verse there is ambiguity ... It is hard to see who Allah (SWT) said this to ...

The living and dieing would have taken the dual form and not the plural form if Allah (SWT) was just addressing Adam (AS) and Hawwa (AS) ... This is why I contested Mr.Popat when he was trying to limit the verse to Adam and Eve ... However I still didn't argue with him about the whole of humankind because - there is ambiguity it can still be argued that this verse is in the plural because it CAN be applied to the whole of humankind ... that is why the plurality is there ... but it still cannot be used in the plural because at the time if 2 individuals are being addressed even if they represent the whole of humankind the words to be used will be in the dual form ...

Hence the tafsirs of the Qur'an narrate plural addressees - Adam (AS), Hawwa (AS) and Iblis and in some cases the Snake too ..

So this verse is

a) Ambiguous about who the addressees are
b) It has no ta'keed - i.e. no kullu and no inna ...
c) Not directly mentioning Isa (AS)
d) Miracle also makes for special cases
e) It is not listed as a necessitated step-by-step chain of events - i.e. first living, then second dieing, then third resurrecting ...It is more open than that ... You will live, and you will die and you will be resurrected ...
f) The authenticated tafsir do not link this verse as being the absolute order of events for all human life.

And for these reasons it does not disprove the Ascension of Isa (AS) ... to say so is wishful thinking !!!

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

You made a sweeping statement that the first ijmah of as-sahabah as YOU know of is that they (may Allah be pleased with them all) believed that ALL prophets before Muhammad (saw) had died.

You had used the word ‘WE’ which I safely assume you are referring to Jamaat Ahmadiyah, right?

It makes no difference what your Jamaat believes – they have right to believe what they like.

I want you to show me evidence on what basis does your Jamaat believe that that it is Ijmah of the Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them all) that ALL prophets before Muhammad (saw) had died.

Let’s clear this then we can move to other issues.

Secondly, What is position of your Jamaat on Miracles of Allah?

Being a rationalist How would you define a miracle?

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

Also to clarify

Kullu .... Qul .... and Kul are three different words ...

Kullu means "all"

Kul means "Eat (imperative - instruction)

Qul means "Say (imperative - instruction)

Rab-u-Naas - Does not contain any further information than the translation "Lord of the People" ... Rab-ul-'Alameen translates to "Lord of the Worlds" any further meaning that you want to give to these cannot be obtained from the Arabic text ... they have to be obtained from tafsir ... Wallahul'Alim

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

Ibn Sadique and Psyah:

Why are you avoiding Chapter Sura Al-Imran, Verse 145 all the time?

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

I've sent you a PM on this just now ... I don't know what it is you are asking ... Perhaps it is to do with the idea that one prophet dies then another comes in his place ... I agree with this assessment - but the language of the Qur'an for that verse makes it permissible to have exceptions to this ... That is why I asked for where the "all" had come from ... as you rightly modified it afterwards - you took it out.

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

my two cents on 3:144)

verse says "**And Muhammad is only a Messenger. Verily, Messengers have passed away before him. If then he die or be slain, will you turn back on your heels? And he who turns back on his heels shall not harm Allah at all. And Allah will certainly reward the grateful."

**In this verse, example of earlier messengers has been used to prove that prophet Muhammad(pbuh) is just a messenger of Allah. Messengers before him have passed away so his(pbuh) case will not be different than theirs. There could be only two possibilities that are listed i.e, either he dies naturally or gets killed. No third possibility. The two possibilities listed actually explains 'QAD KHALAT'.
Now at the time of the passing away of the holy prophet (pbuh), some of the companions including hazrat umar(ra) refused to accept the fact the holy prophet has died and claimed that he will come back and take care of the 'munafiqeen'. Hazrat Abu bakr(ra) came forward and recited this very verse. The effect was sudden and decisive. Each one of the companions understood and accepted the fact that the holy prophet (pbuh) has indeed passed away. No one came up with the idea of finding exceptions in this verse for him. No one presented the example of Isa(as) or anyone else believed to have passed this world without dying. Each one of them understood just after listening to the verse that the prophet (pbuh) has passed away. This event is the first concensus among the companions after the prophet (pbuh) not only on his death but on the death of all the messengers before him. If there was room for exceptional departure for Isa(as), the attestation on the death of the prophet(pbuh) would have been incomplete.

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

refer to earlier posts by Psyah, it has been discussed

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

No. I have been asked where the word *all *went. Very fruitful Discussion.

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

You know what we do? We either have 2 people discussing this matter or we leave this and lock the Thread. We are creating such a chaos here. I'm out.

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

Peace kchughtai my brother

This doesn't even make sense ... I've shown Qad Khalat from the Qur'an has been used for things that cannot die ... events that pass on ... read in this thread you will see them ... regarding possible options ... We have 1) Die (natural or otherwise) 2) Ascension ...

Of course you have to believe in Ascension in order to draw that conclusion ... Since you do not believe in Ascension you do not believe it has that meaning and since we believe in Ascension the same verse shows to us that it caters for that belief of Ascension... We actually have an added advantage in that we can then argue that if Qad Khalat meant Mawt only, then the Qur'an would not use the word Qad Khalat ... but Mawt.

Every term in Qur'anic Arabic however similar its meaning in normal speech is USED because of its subtle difference - When Allah (SWT) makes "mawt" explicit there is a reason for it ... the use of Qad Khalat draws us to wonder why that particular term is being used ... Since it has ambiguity ... it cannot "prove" anything ... but it can allow possibility and that is how we have accepted it ... added to this is with the various other uses Qad Khalat appears.

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

my belief:
'If he then dies or is slain' explains why it was accepted

'slain' includes those not dead through martyredom in the cause of Allah, thus extending the range of Qad khalat

however Isa ibn Maryam AS was for sure not killed, and Allah raised him unto Himself and Allah is All-Powerful All-Wise

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

Before you put off the lights and shut the door, please address the following: If you define what a Divine miracle is, you'll get a lot of answers to your queries - Believe me.

It's good idea that you carry on with brother ** psyah** - i hope he has the time to deal when you keep going on in circles.

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

Muhammad (PBUH) is not more than a Messenger of God, and Messengers before him have passed away. So if there is a Prophet's before Muhammad (PBUH) who did not pass away, is he more than just a Prophet?