I don't approve of any atrocity by any one. But Zionists are remorseless and their atrocities continue.
When there is a war, people are getting killed. On both sides. Such is the nature of wars, unfortunately. It seems though that only those instances when Israelis kill Muslims are noticed by you and invariably labeled "atrocities".
Well, nor has any other country used any nuke. So what does it prove?
You've argued that Israel is so "bad" that it is very likely to use nukes if it has them. Well, Israel has had nukes for about 30 years, but yet has not used them despite its alleged "badness".
If you don't know about Israeli military secrets then how can you call those reports "imaginary"?
Because they don't know them either. Everything they wrote - they pulled it right out of their asses.
It's funny to hear this "holy" stuff coming from an atheist.
It's called considering feelings and beliefs of OTHER people. I understand that it might be a difficult concept to grasp.
Israel DID declare war by occupying Islam's holy land.
Or maybe it is the Muslims who occupied the Jewish Holy land?
Anyway, this argument is rather typical. Apparently, once a land is deemed Holy for Muslims, the Muslim rule is the only one accepted there, regardless of the "holiness" of this land for other people and religions.
Actually, your talk of "all things holy", despite being an "atheist foreigner occupier" in this holy land of Jews and Muslims, shows your intolerance and disrespect towards Islam and Muslims.
I don't see how it follows.
BTW, if you want to compare the situation with religious freedom, tolerance and treatment of the holy sites in the Holy Land under the Muslim vs the Zionist rule, the results will be very very much not in favor of the Muslims.
Well, I don't know about India-Pakistan, but this HAS been the Zionist solution. They DID impose Zionist rule, and they DID expel Palestinians from their homes.
Oh, you mean like the India Muslim league who created Pakistan by imposing the Muslim rule and expelling Hindus and Sikhs from their homes?
Israeli independence from WHOM?
From everybody else. That what independence usually means. But if you want to go into specifics, it was the British rule there right before the independence.
Israel is an occupier and a foreigner in Middle East. Muslim reaction was expected.
Even if you haven't read anything besides the Koran, you should have noticed that the Jews are Middle Eastern people, they lived in Middle East in the times of Muhammad, and long long before him as well.
The Land of Israel, specifically, is the cradle of the Jewish people, the place were the Jewish identity was born and the Jewish nation came to be. It takes a special kind of audacity to call the Jews foreigners in the Land of Israel.
I understand that some Muslims claim the entire Middle East, each and every piece of it, for themselves and only for themselves, but it's just egotistic chauvinism, nothing more.
Actually, it is Israel who has proven time and again that it does not want peace. There have been several attempts made by many Muslim countries to somehow manage some peace in the region, but Israel has bulldozed every effort.
Really, just several attempts? Israel has made countless peace offers to the Arabs and Muslims. All of them have been rejected. How come? Or is it only the Muslims who have the privilege to choose which offer to accept?
While many Muslim countries are trying to find a compromise, I personally think that there can not be a compromise with Zionist terrorists. Sure we can buy some time. But this regime would have to fall, so that people of all religion, including Muslims, Jews and Christians can live there peacefully and democratically.
I have news for you. There is already a place in the Middle East where people of all religions, including Muslims, Jews, Christians, Baha'i, Druze, etc. live together in democracy. It's called the State of Israel.