Re: Ban Loudspeaker
Hmm… I see… so there is already an established system of performing prayer in a large congregation. They used Mukabbar to carry the thakbirs of Imam it seems.
Well, If Using Mukabbar (human) is what Allah and His Messenger taught us to do, then why didn’t we follow it? And why did we replace Their teaching with our inventions? Is it because we are more smarter then they?
If we continued praying with the Mukabbar system till today, we wouldn’t be simply wasting our time here for loudspeaker, fight for it’s use against Hindus in India, no time wasting debates in Dubai, No writing of books against its usage by many scholars (e.g. Endless Bliss), No disturbance in midway prayer if the current goes off, no publishing in newspapers and in the first place No trying to outsmart Allah and His Messenger's decisions, of course.
Why did we ignore Allah’s command when He said, “Do not be too loud in your prayers or too quiet in it,” Isn’t it crystal clear from this that, to be too loud is not allowed in prayer? And still we keep disobeying Him, and advocate using loudspeakers against His will. Why?
Armughal bhai, you may be right in saying that the word Mukabbar(as a coincidence), is used for both the Man (assistant Imams) and the Man-made *(loudspeaker). *But do you think it is wise to substitute a good thing for a bad one. I mean if you call “MAN” to a robot, does that robot become a man? No. It still remains a robot. Do you think any father will agree to barter his son in exchange of a robot? No again. Then How Can we expect our Allah to do it with his Mukabbar in exchange of some pieces of dead metals. Do you find it logical in anyway? Well, For instance, imagine ourselves in a big congregation and after each five lines of Muktadies a robot as mukabbar is put to mimic the Imams thakbirs. Don’t you think other religionist will laugh at us for playing this way with our own religion? Who knows may be in the near future we will start calling such a (devilish) prayer as a part of Modern & Moderate Islam. Allah forbids.
After inquiring about ‘Mukabbar’ with two of our local scholars, they told me that there are 6 pre-requisites and conditions to be qualified as a Mukabbar.
They are:
(1) Mukabbar should be a man or jinn. (Even Angels made of Nur will not be allowed.)
(2) Should be a living being. (Jandar)
(3) Should have faith. (Imandar)
(4) With sound mental Health. (Akaldar)
(5) Should be over the age of Puberty. (Baleg)
(6) Should be praying with the other Muktadies in the same jamat.
Now tell me which of these 6 conditions does our modern Mukabbar (loudspeaker) fulfill or have, that we are blindly following it five times a day? Moreover when an Imam says “Samiallahu leman hamidah” Mukabbar behind him should say “Rabbana walakal hamd”. Is our so-called “Mukabbar sahib” telling “Rabbana wa…” at that time? NO!!
At this point a question may be asked to my fellow Gupshup members as, what religion we were discussing all this time? Is it that Islam which our Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) taught us, or a newly Modified, Metallic, and an Innovated Islam?
Thank you armughal Bhai for telling about the Mukabbar, which led me to do some research on it. Thank you again for the knowledge.
I hope everybody stop blindly following what Mullahs does,and think becoz its not they going to answer our deeds but we ourselves.
Quote from Hadith
“Beware of novelty*(new things)* in religion, for every novelty is an innovation and every innovation is a misguidance. Verily Allah has blocked every innovator from repentance until he abandons it.” Narrated by Thirmizi.
“Whoever rejects my sunnah is not from me.” Narrated by Al Bukhari and Muslim. (Putting mukabbar is a sunnah no longer in use)
“Pray as you have seen me praying” Narrated by Al Bukhari.
“Whoever performed a deed which is not from this matter of ours, will have it rejected. (on the last day)” Narrated by Muslim.