Are taleban today's kharijiites?

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

The reason I am not citing those hadiths or their interpretaions by other people which say Iraq was meant to be the place is simply because I do not want to go down to the same road you have been going so far in this thread.

Readers may then start hating Iraq and those hadiths may not even be related to current day and time or people of Iraq. :smack:

Search on your own and you will find those hadiths and their interpretations.

Again,…please stop preaching generalized hatred.

And please stop calling people kharijis/takfiris worthy of being killed, based on your interpretations or understanding.

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

No, you should come up with those hadith … but then, I have read large part of Sahi Bukhari, Sahi Muslim, and Muwatta, and also lot of other hadith books … but never came with any hadith ‘linking Horn of Shaitan with Iraq’ … so if you quote the hadith you are claiming with reference than it would be great thing for my knowledge (and knowledge of all who would read you). :slight_smile:

As far as I know, the only hadith some misguided people claim linking ‘Iraq with horn of Shaitan’ is the one I quoted in my earlier post … and along with my quote I also gave explanation why what they claim is absurd.

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

I hadn't read about this hadith but its interesting how Saudia has played its role in destabilizing the whole Muslim world by its intolerant ways.

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

^^^
‘Najdi Hadith’ is very important (and famous) hadith mentioned in many hadith books with various sources and is considered as very reliable hadith. Importance of this hadith is that, it tells about a group of people (a sect) who would appear just before Judgement day, would be practicing staunch Muslim as far as ritual deeds are concerned … they would misguide many Muslims, would create Fitna and Fisad throughout Muslim world, and would be outside the fold of Islam, would be agents of Shaitan and would be with Dajjal.

I think, every Muslim should know of this hadith with detail, so that one can save oneself from the 'Fitna of Najdi sect'.

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

^ in 1,400 years of Muslim history, there have been several instances where the prophecy can be attributed to a particular group of people.

I am not disputing the role of Saudi Arabia or whatever. I am just saying that such prophecies are vague and can be interpreted in several ways.

We need to take care of ourselves. If there is a group of people that is killing innocent people (regardless the ideologies of those killing or being killed), that has to be dealt with. If you kill anyone that you did not have the authority to kill, you must be punished. That's that.

There are much more reliable and direct orders in Quran and Hadith that condemn killing without reason. Those would be much more effective in educating people than trying to fit a prophecy into our times.

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

^^^ In History, no sect came from Najd in Arabia ... east of Medina ... who were Staunch Muslim as far as rituals are concerned, are known takfeeries, interpret Quran applying ayahs on Muslims what is meant for Kuffar ... and who created fitna and fisad all over Muslim world ... and are cause of many killings and mayhem ... except the one we are talking about.

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

All i am asking is rather then hearsay , can you provide me evidences where they called everyone other then them kaffirs, as claimed by you people?

and i am not justifying them, i cannot justify killing of civilians by any one, i want prove other then media reports.

Sorry but your post does not make any sense to me. You may choose to wish death for these people(dogs of hell aging less then 10 years - as many children die due to this drone strikes) just first of all kindly prove in a to the point post that they are kharijis.Your posts seems to go in all direction instead of giving me any concrete reply.i can reply to points raised in your posts but that will derail this thread as some of your comments are not related.

and thank you for your prayers, i am not supporting them and i cant, all i am doing is questioning why they are called kharijis. To me TTP and pak army both are just doing similar things, killing innocent people. it is my dua that this fitna/azab is eliminated from pakistan and we may live peacefully.

i am of the firm believe that pakistan took the wrong decision based on propaganda by people like you to participate in war of terror which made some of our countrymen against us and now none of them is in right path. if this practice continue then once powerful clans of waziristan are against us then this will be much more serious then we think.

May ALLAH make peace talks between muslims possible and succesfull.

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

Like I said I am not going to do what you are doing just because I have no intention to malign Iraq or any place, either.

Hope readers can search on their own.

Just as a hint: There are people who think Najd could be one of 13 different places. Go figure!

Now please go ahead and convince them too.

Even if I post links or another views against yours you will not accept.

You make up things out of hadiths after reading them and refuse to accept that these kind of hadiths are at best controversial.

Your view is NOT universally agreed upon.

Neither you can prove Qayamat is coming soon nor you can prove wth certainty that Salafis/Wahabis/Ahle Hadiths/those who live in KSA, were meant to be the bad guys by these hadiths.

Sorry, you are promoting sectarians and National hatred here.

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

A person is Takfeeri if that person calls even a single person ‘Kafir’ who claims that he is Muslim (only exception is the person who claims to be Muslim is Takfeeri ... as then one can call that person 'Kafir' ... though as precaution we call him Takfeeri)

Why a takfeeri is Kafir? … because according to a hadith … When a person calls someone Kafir then either caller is Kafir or called is Kafir.

Now … since in Islam … if a person claims that he is Muslim … that claim of being Muslim (by default) also means the person has claimed that he believes on Allah and Rasul Allah (SAW) … and that also means he is reciter of Kalma-e-Shahadah … then it becomes obligatory on Muslims to not only accept him Muslim but treat him Muslim too and .. after a person's claim that he is Muslim … no one other than Allah on judgment day could judge his Imaan … unless that person himself retracts from his claim.

That means if someone do takfeer on a person who claims that he is Muslim (calls the person Kafir who claims that he is Muslim) then for every Muslim that caller should be a Kafir (according to hadith) as he has done takfeer on Muslim.

It also means, one can only call kafir who either admits that he is not Muslim … or Takfeeri (because, due to his takfeer, he becomes Kafir).

As for Kharjees , these people do not only do takfeer but kill or injure people based on their takfeer and other of their deviant beliefs.

I or anyone does not have to prove you that TTP and sectarian outfits are Kharjees, we all know that. Only thing I can say is that … if anyone do not want to see the proof then no one can open their eyes … and thus proof for them would be on judgment day (at their own cost).

In this world we have to make sure that all should be equal in the eyes of law, all should have right to live the way they like to live (without harming anyone), and no one should harms anyone due to their beliefs (doing takfeer on Muslim is biggest crime against a Muslim and for that punishment should be as severe by state), or take laws in their own hand. Implementation of laws should be in the hands of government who should respect individuals beliefs (as long as that belief is not harming anyone), and we have to distinguish between government functionaries and private (non-state) individuals (army could punish criminals, rebels, terrorists, etc ... but civilians have no right to fight army or punish innocent civilians).

[quote]
[Sorry but your post does not make any sense to me. You may choose to wish death for these people (dogs of hell aging less then 10 years - as many children die due to this drone strikes) just first of all kindly prove in a to the point post that they are kharijis.Your posts seems to go in all direction instead of giving me any concrete reply.i can reply to points raised in your posts but that will derail this thread as some of your comments are not related.
[/quote]

Please be free to comment on my post and criticize how much you like, but do not lie in your accusation.

I have never said that all who got killed due to drone are Kharjees … or are ‘dogs of hell’ as you are trying to accuse me of in your post … as maybe 10 years old or even innocent grown up may have got killed due to drone. Only thing I wrote is that drones are doing good job killing ‘dogs of hell’.

If intention of an act is known than it is obligatory to judge an act on intention behind the act (Innamal amaal-o-bin neyaat). As far as I know, drones are not intentionally killing innocent people but drone strikes are only with intention to kill Kharjee terrorists.

Each drone attack cost millions of dollars … and there use is to save innocents people living around terrorists. Drones are used when government get information that terrorist are present at a place. In such situation, government could use bombers to kill terrorists, as it would be cheaper, but civilian casualties would be huge, hence Drones. Drones are used for precise bombing so that only terrorists get killed and innocent stay safe … though obviously some innocent may have got killed unintentionally (that is undeniable) … hence I believe drone is doing good job.

As for these terrorists being Kharjees … there is no doubt in my mind … and I gave adequate reasons for my belief. Maybe you have doubt… so before answering you (again … point to point) … I would like to know the definition of Takfeeries and Kharjees according to you … else I would keep calling something ‘Apple’ that you may be thinking is ‘Orange’. :)

[quote]
and thank you for your prayers, i am not supporting them and i cant, all i am doing is questioning why they are called kharijis. To me TTP and pak army both are just doing similar things, killing innocent people. it is my dua that this fitna/azab is eliminated from pakistan and we may live peacefully.
[/quote]

You are welcome … obviously I pray that Allah keep you and your family safe from fitna of Kharjees … but in the end it is your choice.

Allah has given us enough intelligence to know right from wrong … and obviously basic intelligence, Quran, hadith and many other sources are there to guide us. Fact is that in this era of information boom, we have access to more information about Islam and related subjects, then most Muslims ever had in past. Only requirement is that we look at things without our own biases due to beliefs we learned from people we trusted over the years.

Anyhow … as you asked … you will get the answer why these people (TTP) are Kharjees if you understand what is Kharjees according to those who call them Kharjees… but if your definition is different than no one can convince you … and our differences would get sorted out on judgment day.

[quote]
i am of the firm believe that pakistan took the wrong decision based on propaganda by people like you to participate in war of terror which made some of our countrymen against us and now none of them is in right path. if this practice continue then once powerful clans of waziristan are against us then this will be much more serious then we think.

May ALLAH make peace talks between muslims possible and succesfull.
[/quote]

Pakistan took decision keeping in mind Pakistani interest and that is what every country does (and they should do too). Taliban were not bothered about Pakistani laws or Pakistani interest, though Pakistan tried to help Taliban government as much as practically possible short of bringing harm to Pakistan. That is the reason Pakistan throughout American attack on Taliban government, kept recognising Taliban government until time Kabul fell.

Before bombing started in Afghanistan, Pakistan told Taliban government that they should handover OBL and Pakistan would see that he gets fair trial outside USA, in international criminal court at Hague. But Taliban wanted to go down the drain and that is what happened. Only problem is that, when they got beating from USA bombs they started biting Pakistani hands that always fed them.

Pakistan did not entered war but Taliban getting beating from Northern Alliance supported by USA bombers, started using Pakistani land to fight their war, and also started creating fitna and fisad in Pakistan (were neighbour from hell). And unfortunately, some Pakistani traitors joined them, also started harming Pakistan.

You should know that Pakistani army is not fighting anyone outside Pakistan that it could be called fighting for or against. Pakistan army is fighting armed rebels (TTP, Taliban, AL-Q, sectarian outfits, etc) within Pakistan, and that is duty of Pakistan army to fight any rebels within Pakistan fighting the state and killing innocent Pakistanis. Pakistan army is obviously on right path and doing their duty, as in every law (including Islamic law), states do not negotiate with rebels fighting state and killing innocent civilians. State fight these rebels and punish them severely.

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

I know that Kharjees and their supporters have made 100s of baseless claims about Najdi hadith and location of Najd. I would not be surprised if someone from them would come with idea that since Najd mean upland … or land at height … Najd in Hadith is Moon and Kharjees would be Aliens who would appear with Dajjal who would be a demon from Mars. :)

*Anyhow … 4 things are clear in hadith and that is:
*

1: At time of prophet (SAW), Najd has to a land where people were Muslims and land was under Muslim rule.

Reason: Muslims seeing Prophet (SAW) praying for Shaam and Yemen, asked Prophet (SAW) to pray for ‘Najd’ … a place they considered as their own and people following their faith (Islam) … hence ‘our Najd’

2: Najd has to be at height in Arabia … and that is Najd we know today too (located in KSA) … it is a plateau around 1000 meters above sea level … higher than any place in Arabia east of Madina … hence it is called Najd.

Reason: Najd means a land at height … or upland … or highland.

3: Language of Najd during the time of Prophet (SAW) must be Arabic ... and it is known that Arabic was language of only Arabian Peninsula during the time of Prophet (SAW).

Reason: Najd is Arabic word and that is the reason name of this place (Najd) is in Arabic (with its meaning … that is, Najd or highland).

4: Najd has to be ‘East of Madina (exact East)’ … and east of Madina there is only two cities of significance and they are Riyadh and Abu Dhabi. Both cities ‘Riyadh and Abu Dhabi’ lies exactly east of Madina … I mean exactly … all falling on line of latitude (24.46 degree) north of equator.

Reason: Prophet (SAW) pointed towards East ... and since Prophet (SAW) was Prophet of Allah, he knew where he was pointing and wherever he pointed it must be exact. People also knew where he was pointing and they could not have lied about where Prophet (SAW) pointed ... and thus their claim that Prophet (SAW) pointed towards East has to be accurate and exact.

Anyone calling a place Najd mentioned in Hadith somewhere in north (like Iraq) or any other place, must be weak in not only intelligence but also in geography).

Now … if you can find a place that fulfils all above identity requirements of location … clear identity requirements mentioned in hadith … then talk else accept that Najd is what we have Najd in KSA and hadith is referring to this Najd (KSA).

I am not going into traits of people who would appear from Najd, just leaving that aside even though Wahabis, Takfeeris/kharjees fall straight into it. … ... I am just quoting obvious from hadith regarding location of Najd … and I know that no place on earth can be Najd mentioned in hadith other than one we have in KSA.

Remember … after departure of Prophet (SAW), first fitna also came out of Najd and that was of Muslima the false prophet … but obviously, that fitna was different and not as bad as present fitna … because people of present fitna according to hadith would be claiming themselves Muslim … would be staunch ritual practicing Muslim, would read Quran beautifully, would be praying 5 times a say, would be takfeeri/kharjee in every way, would create fitna and fisad all over Muslim world (as they are doing that with the help of suicide bombers, deviant preaching, terrorism, bombs, guns, and petro-dollar), would have little brain … and would eventually join Dajjal.

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

:omg:

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

You are having good laugh … kiya may nay kuch zaidah kah diya? :slight_smile:

Anyhow, what I know, here is cost of each drone strike.

USA is normally using Predator drone in Pakistan equipped with 2 Hellfire Missiles.

Each Hellfire Missiles cost around $70000 … that means 2 Missiles cost around $140000 … and that is minor cost.

Add drone fuel cost, base cost, maintenance cost, operating cost, intelligence cost, payment to agents on ground, drone casualties, wastage, overhead, etc, etc and etc … adding all costs plus cost of missiles could easily reach around million dollars per strike (that is … Total cost over the period divided by total strikes over the period).

But then, I could be wrong and it maybe several hundred thousand dollars if not a million. :slight_smile:

Re: Steeped in ancient mysticism, passion of Pakistani Sufis infuriates Taliban

1-bhai i need proves where they called some one kafir and their reasons and why you believe that these reasons are incorrect. See you are making a fatwa that only religiously illeterate people like lal topi are giving, majority of scholars have still not called them khawarij.

2-Try asking your drone friends to be more precise in their strikes, as these strikes are killing more innocents then dogs of hell. i think dogs of hell can only die in collateral damage in these strikes. :)

3-i would appreciate if your reply is not more then 500 characters and to the point. :)

PS; we will continue to have this discussion once a separate thread is opened.

Re: Are taleban today's kharijiites?

[MOD]I have split the thread, but this does not have anything to do with Pakistan Affairs now. I'll keep it here for the time being, but can move it to Religious forum at a later stage[/MOD]

Re: Are taleban today's kharijiites?

As far a I am concerned, the title also needs to be changed. Like I mentioned earlier I never talked about "Talibans" in any of my posts above or the parent thread on Sufis.

it should say:

"Who are Kharijis"

or

Are Salafis/Deobandis/Ahle Hadiths/Saudis Kharijis?

Thank you.

Re: Are taleban today's kharijiites?

^^^ Wahabis, Deobandis, Salafis, ahle-hadith … all are Muslim sects with understanding of Islam different from Shias and Sunnis (in subcontinent, known as Sufis or Berelvis).

Fact is that, Deobandis and Sunnis have differences only on few aspect of Islam and that also happened because Wahabi ideology influenced Deobandi ulemas and infiltrated Deobandi teachings. Actually Deobandi sect started in India amongst Sunnis due to influence and emergence of Wahabism in Arabia.

In past, Wahabis, Deobandis, Ahle-hadith, Salafis aqaids (‘ideology and understanding of Islam’) was present amongst Muslims but at level that they did not took-up an identity (were not known as Wahabis, Deobandis, Ahle-hadith or Salafis ... just Sunni). From them Kharjees occasionally used to emerge, creating ‘killing, fitna and fisad amongst Muslims’, but then they used to get suppressed after creating a short spree of killing and mayhem.

Occasionally, rulers used to use Kharjee energy of creating ‘fitna and fisad’ to fulfil their own ambitions of suppression and conquer. Same happened in Pakistan when Zia-ul-Haq regime brought Saudi insecurity about their kingdom (due to Iranian revolution destroying Kingdom in Iran) so to divert attention from Iranian revolution and restrain that revolution from coming out of Iran.

Later, Pakistan started using Taliban and other Kharjee outfits to create mayhem in neighbouring state … but when these Kharjees started biting the hands who was feeding them (Pakistan and Pakistan armed forces), we are seeing all the problems and talk.

As for Taliban, A-Q, TTP and sectarian outfits, they are not sects, but branched out ‘group of people’ from Wahabis, Deobandis, Ahle-hadith, Salafis, etc and became Kharjees due to their ‘Takfeer, fitna and fisad’. Wahabis, Deobandis, Ahle-hadith and Salafis occasionally support these Kharjees (with money, moral, and men) not due to their love for these Kharjees but because they think these Kharjees belong to their sect (when they do not).

Fact is that, if one asks any peaceful Wahabi, Deobandi, Ahle-Hadith or Salafi that if they would like to do 'Takfeer' or would like to join Taliban, A-Q, sectarian outfits, etc … most of them would answer ‘NO’ ... and many would even denounce them.

When we talk about Najdi fitna, we talk about ideology presented by Abdul Wahab to create fitna and fisad in Arabia … so that Najdi tribal leader (Saud) can use that ideology to do takfeer on Arabian Muslims and kill, convert to this ideology, and/or conquer them. Later that ideology became part and parcel of Saudi system exporting it to other parts of Islamic land, and regularly creating group of people who are doing 'takfeer' and creating 'fitna and fisad' amongst Muslims.

Re: Are taleban today's kharijiites?

bhago yahan se bhai, yahan to kufr ke fatway lag rahay hayn.

May be move it to R&S now and leave a pointer in PA for reference.

Re: Are taleban today's kharijiites?

woh mussalmaan hi kaisa joh kuffar kay fatway na lagai....

Re: Are taleban today’s kharijiites?

Can you copy paste some information that you have regarding the bolded part.

And please can you tell me what aqaidh/kuffar fatwas the current day kharij(according to you) have that make them khawarij. Please dont just make statement, try giving me some referenced reply(like when /in which book they gave those statement) so that i know that you know the subject and are not influenced by external factors.This is what i am asking from you people since my initial posts but you guys tend to ignore this.

Let see how saleem last post fare in wordle.

We got your point bhai saab, all you need is to prove that. shukran

The thread now belongs to Religion forum.


Restored attachments:

Re: Are taleban today's kharijiites?

Yahan tau taliban say bura hal hay, kuffar ka fatwa and the reason "kion kay hum keh rahy hain".