Zia's killing Pak cinema, responsible for increase in vulgarity in Pak society

Zia attempts to radicalize Pakistan society has been the source of many evils facing Pakistan today.
His main push was to eliminate the so-called “vulgarity” from the society. But ironically, one of the steps he took back-fired, and resulted in even more vulgarity in society. I am talking about his deliberate attempts to kill Pakistan cinema.
He was quite successful in this endeavor. Today Pakistan cinema is virtually non-existent. But the death of Pakistan cinema left a void. And much to the chagrin of many people, this void has been filled by the Bharati cinema.

Now Bharati cinema is much more vulgar, and no-thanks to Zia’s radical policies towards our cinema, Pakistan people have no choice but to watch Bharati cinema, and get effected by its bad influence on Pakistan society.

Reporting from Lahore, Pakistan - The Odeon Cinema’s creaky, ripped red vinyl seats are mostly empty except for a couple of back rows where a dozen Pakistani men sit slouched, their eyes half-open, legs slung over the seats in front of them. Along the hall’s bubble-gum pink walls, rows of fans barely move the hot, dank air. The Odeon’s loudspeakers crackle like a ham radio.

The feature on this recent evening is a Pakistani film called “Majajan,” a love story. The barely breathing, Lahore-based Pakistani film industry produces less than a dozen movies each year, which explains why every day, three times a day for the last three years, the only movie screened at the Odeon has been “Majajan.”

Welcome to Lollywood, or what’s left of it. It wasn’t always this way. Back in the 1960s and '70s, Lahore buzzed with movie shoots, red-carpet premieres and box-office hits. The Pakistani film industry has always been based here, and though it didn’t have the girth or dazzle of Bombay’s Bollywood, “Lollywood” thrived in a country staking out an identity distinct from its Indian neighbor.

In their heyday, theaters such as the Odeon had queues of Pakistanis snaking far beyond the box-office window and down Lahore’s bustling sidewalks. Moviegoers dressed in their snazziest salwar kameezes and arrived two hours before a showing to secure tickets.

Today, Pakistani cinema has all but vanished, a victim of the VCR, cable television, President Muhammad Zia ul-Haq’s Islamization of Pakistani society, and finally DVD piracy. In 1985, 1,100 movie houses operated in Pakistan; today, only 120 are in business. The few directors, producers and cinema owners often rely on second jobs to make ends meet.

Reviving the industry necessitates junking what’s left of Pakistani cinema and starting from scratch, says Jahanzaib Baig, a Lahore cinema owner pushing for a revival of Pakistani film. Baig has been lobbying the government to clamp down on DVD piracy, a scourge that keeps Pakistanis from leaving their living rooms to head to cinemas. “We have hit rock bottom,” says Baig. “We can only go up. Whatever we had before is not only destroyed but is obsolete in terms of technology and skills. So we’re setting the foundation for a new film industry in Pakistan.”

Sangeeta, a Lollywood mega-star during the 1970s and one of the few survivors still directing homegrown films, says a revival of the industry can happen only if the Pakistani government lends a hand.

“We need government support,” says Sangeeta, now 52. “We need new cameras, new studios. Right now, producers aren’t investing because the equipment isn’t good.”

On the set of a television drama she’s shooting, the hardships Sangeeta faces are evident. The cameras are dead ringers for clunky 1980s camcorders. There are no trailers, no craft service, no security to keep Pakistani passers-by from wandering onto the set.

Zia, the alternate of Abdullah Bin Ubai, who was condemned in Holy Quraan with strong terms for his hypocracy, destroyed all institutions in Pakisan including Pakistani Film Industry. Woh to jahanam rasid ho gaya magar mulk ko tabah o barbard kar gaya.

The height of hyporcacy can be measured when he invited to his house many times the Indian actor Shetro Ghan Sinha on the demand of his metally challenged daughter. He had full communication with actors of Bollywood but bambooed Pakistani film industry.

Re: Zia's killing Pak cinema, responsible for increase in vulgarity in Pak society

[quote]
Pakistan people have no choice but to watch Bharati cinema
[/quote]

I refuse to buy that.

Pakistan has no dearth of excellent writers, lyricists, musicians, talented actors minus its thriving film industry. I am from India, out of curiosity I had seen a few very old Pakistani films on video. I thought that when bollywood thrives on artificiality and a sub culture, Pakistani films being down to earth have preserved the subcontinetal Indian culture. You can find numerous Indians conceding my idea. In the field of music, few Pak films have created wonderful musical effect through its meaningful songs with few indigenous instruments which expensive and huge orchestra of bollywood could not.

Now why I am saying this. Instead of competing with commercial bollywood, pakistani films through their simple narration can put a marvellous cinematic idiom and become a beacon of excellent cinematic language by speaking for the distressed common man marred with scores of domestic and social problems. This is only possible when Pakistani intellectuals come in front and take collective initiative. Don't look for govt help in any way, this will put all efforts in vain.

Re: Zia's killing Pak cinema, responsible for increase in vulgarity in Pak society

Yeah just blame someone and relax.

Why? Give us the alternatives, where Pakistani people could understand the language.

It is even easier not to bother to look at the reasons of the failure.

Re: Zia's killing Pak cinema, responsible for increase in vulgarity in Pak society

^Well Zia is not the only reason for the failure. Our National TV made great shows and dramas until late 90's but now they're in disaster, why?

Although I agree Zia's regime was the most suffocating and stagnant one in our history, no one is forcing us to watch Indian movies (not cinema).

Sangeeta isn't complaining about Zia though. Her complaint is about the equipment. I wonder if the wonderful film-makers of 70s and television drama producers of 80s had better equipment.

Its about your commitment and talent and Pakistan film industry lacks both at this time. How much government support and technology is needed to remind them that a person having been shot 21 times (I counted, and the person in question was Shan) does not remain in a condition to pick up a gun and shoot down 25 guys and eventually run to hug the heroine.

That is so humble of him, Sultan rahi used to catch the rocket fired at him and throw it back to the bad guys, ofcourse by that time he had been shot and beaten and every thing...

I wonder why we all have to "yell" and "curse" one specific leader for all the crimes in the society.

Cinema's decline occurred due to two main reasons.

  1. Religious chauvinism of Pak society
  2. New trends in the design of movie halls and the cinema owners' refusal to update the core trends of movie going.

1 - Religious chauvinism

Zia was there for 10 years, but the religious rot in our society had started long before he forced himself on the scene.

Pakistanis have over the years adopted Saudi view towards entertainment. That means all the music all the pictures are haram except duff or some other medieval Arab music.

As there were no cinemas allowed in Saudi, we as citizens of Pak quit supporting the movie halls.

We also failed to understand the modern concept of Movie ratings such as the Hollywood system of PG, PG-13, and R.

Instead of allowing the age-based permission to view a movie, we have treated adults and kids with the same censorship. Thus exposing both adults and kids to the vulgarity.

Had we implemented the movie rating system, and allowed movie theater owners to enforce the age-based showing of the movies, we would have been much better off than where we are now.

2 - Not only in Pakistan but in the West, cinema halls have gone through a sea-change in the last 30+ years.

Theater owners have slowly changed from very large movie halls to a set of 5-10 smaller movie theaters.

The new arrangement allowed the theater operators to screen 5-10 movies and thus making more money than just focusing on one movie at a time.

So the bottom line is that Zia did a lot of terrible things, but the decline of movie theaters have a more reasons than just one person's actions.

We should also look at the general trends in our society and the modern trends in a given industry such as: Movie theaters.

Re: Zia's killing Pak cinema, responsible for increase in vulgarity in Pak society

khoji bhai do you feel the same about Khumeni's regime?

Thats lame. As much as i differ from Zia, this is quite lame excuse to watch vulgar Indian movies. First of all "movies" its self is not bread and butter of life. One can live without watching movies. I dont watch Indian movies (ok may be 1/2 a year), and I am living perfectly fine. Not missing anything.

Sorry but its like, "hum kia kareen? Hamree street kee lerkyoon nai pardah ker leya tha, tu aaap next street kee lerkeyaan hee daikheen gaay na...aab next street kee lerkyaan nude hotee hain tu hum kia kareen? is sai acha yee nahee k hameen apnee hee street kee lerkyaan daikhney doo?"

you really dont need vulgarity for entertainment. our TV dramas have proved that to quite an extent.

DD behen, Khumeini's regime did not kill the cinema. Actually, no other country in the world would deliberately kill its own cinema.

That's your personal opinion that watching movies, a form of entertainment, is not important. Try convincing your neighbors.

[quote]
you really dont need vulgarity for entertainment.
[/quote]

That's the point of thread. Don't stop entertainment. Otherwise people will turn to other sources, which may be more vulgar

Re: Zia’s killing Pak cinema, responsible for increase in vulgarity in Pak society

burqa:

Zia actually started the discouragement of cinema, considering it vulgar. And the society in general agreed.
Why else did downfall start in 80’s? Read this:

Following Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq’s military coup, he began to Islamicise the country and one of the very first victims of this socio-political change included the film industry.[36] Imposition of new registration laws for film producers requiring filmmakers to be degree holders, where not many were, led to a steep decline in the workings of the industry. The government forcibly closed most of the cinemas in Lahore.[37] New tax rates were introduced, further decreasing cinema attendances.
Films dropped from a total output of 98 films in 1979, of which 42 were in Urdu, to only 58 films (26 in Urdu) in 1980.

Because they are following Bharati TV channels, and given up on originality. People they show in dramas now are far different from regular Pakistanis and their lives.

I didn't say that every decline in every aspect of Pakistani society could be contributed to Zia's policies.

True, no one is forcing us. But people need entertainment. And one of the cheapest entertainment is cinema. And in the absence of Pakistani cinema, the alternative available to common Pakistanis is/was Bharati cinema.
As hard as you may try, people will not watch Arabic or English channels, because these languages are altogether foreign to Pakistanis.

my top 2 favorite movies are Iranian: The Color of Paradise and The taste of cherry.

Iran has thriving movie industry. Here in Saudi my friends travel across the border to Bahrain to watch a movie in a cinema.

Re: Zia’s killing Pak cinema, responsible for increase in vulgarity in Pak society

I am not sure if Zia ul Haq directed…