I think you have not read the post which on which I have responded. This kind of selective reasoning only leads to racism and prejudice. Zardari was not alone in all what ever were the deals. Their counter parts "military, cocerned departments" are also invoved. Why only Zardari to be punished why not the people who orginally made the deals should also be punished. This kind of mantra is racism. We are here repeating the begining of 1971 disaster.
Read again that stupid and racist statement, I don't know what he is talking about.
What is racist in this statement?
I am just mentioning Zardar's wrong should not be spared jsut because somebody else has wronged too!
This is a universally accepted fact of normal behaviour. Your linking of Zardari's wrong with other wrongs is in fact abnormal behaviour which no jury in the world will accept as a defence.
Is there any other point in favour of Zardari which you can show the forum except:
1) Accusation that anyone who points out Zardari's crimes is a racist.
2) He should be spared from his crimes because others also have indulged in crimes and state was unable top punish them.
Niden bhai,
With due respect, apart from your verbal slurs of me being stupid idiot and racist, I don't think any jury in the world will be impressed with this kind of defence.
I started a thread accusing President of possesion of assets beyond his known source of income, as reported in a newspaper that SC has been furnished with details of these assets. Possesion of assets beyond your declared income is a crime. In this thread you are trying to defend this crime based on above two points counter accusing me of being racist. As you have accused me of being racist, I want to clarify:
1) I want him to be convicted because I want my money back. As a tax payer it is my money which has been illegally robbed from me.
2) There is nothing racist in this demand. I am the aggrieved party and simply I seek justice.
3) I demanding as a citizen from the government to formulate a system in the country that no one in future can rob me again.
4) I want my money back from everyone who has robbed it, Zardari inclusive.
As I am the aggrieved party I don't want anyone to be spared on what so ever grounds.
I really 100% agree with your last sentence that you really don't know what I am talking about. I can assure you I know exactly what I am talking about!