My position is strictly religious … Sex should be done the proper way or not at all. People don’t have rights over their own bodies … We need to give them back to our Creator.
Personally I will never forceful against gays.
But Govt should not support(rather promote) it as a life style.
I had a cousin who did it. They could have little imbalance in them.
That cousin is happily married to a widow woman with children. One thing, because he did not live up to be a man in his young age, he does have some qualities too.
I think he can be a good social worker and many more things.
okay! I did not have time earlier to answer your posts.
First of all: You said something to divert the question which was posed by catskin.
The question was : Do you think gay marriage is not about sex?
You turned around and gave the answer like a politician: It is not just about sex.
The question was not “just about”.
Right there you admitted sex IS a part of gay marriage. But you phrased the answer in such a way that you would be politically correct but not have to clearly admit that SEX still is part of gay marriage.
Now:
The fundamental problem here is that you and people who endorse gayism do not think gayism is abnormal or unnatural and lots of lots of people rightly and justifiably do.
Why is that?
Because you or people who endorse such activity or behavior either deliberately ignore what is NORMAL and NATURAL and HARMFUL for society
or
are completely brainless to even acknowledge that gay activity is abnormal, unnatural and illogical. Like a disease.
No one hates the diseased person. But all of us feel bad/sad if someone gets affected by any disease.
P.S. Read carefully this, I have answers for your other posts later.
You are so out there it’s comical. My point about Rush was that he’s irrational. He doesn’t care if you’re a citizen by law, you’re not white, you’re not protestant, so GTFO! You would say that he’s just a hate monger, well that’s like the pot calling the kettle black. You are exhibiting the same kind of irrationality towards gays. I don’t think homosexuality should be promoted, but in secular America, gays have every right to a non-religious, civil union.
Nobody’s asking you to love gay people, but do you really think God would punish you for practicing compassion beyond what the Quran outlines? If someone kills your family member, would you be less of a Muslim if you don’t demand his head? (which you are entitled to).
And instead of trying to nitpick at my metaphors, try to consider and respond to my message as a whole.
Please read EDAL’s posts. It’s the same way Glenn Beck claims he’s “just asking questions” about Obama when anyone with half a brain knows that Beck is riled up because Obama is black. And homosexuality is a natural abnormality. Even animals exhibit homosexual behaviour. So homosexuality is not the majority, and I don’t think it should be promoted, but to claim that it is some kind of man made abomination is just stupidity
Point = missed. If Brittany Spears gets divorced within 24 hours you might be slightly amused. If a gay couple decides to get married you’ll be outraged. I’m saying fix the former, before you worry about the latter.
Just a gues - it appears 50% of people in this thread have serious issues with tolerance. There will be less sympathy when I hear protests from the same group re: religious intolerance/bias etc that they experience in the West.
I don’t know why people try to dramatize over and over again what is not really there.
Why even bring words like hatred or ‘tolerance’? :no:
I mean having a negative feeling about gayism is not so uncommon.
A whole lot of majority feels sad about these people or they just do not endorse.
No mass murder of gays has occurred by people in this world by heterosexuals, even where a lot of religious people or heterosexual population lives, and even where a lot of homosexual individuals live where heterosexual people live!!
But these fake gay right proponents love to show somehow they are the champions of gay ‘rights’.
I think a true ‘gay rightist’ will try to educate gays not to engage in such activity or help them get out of this wrong behavior rather than supporting or encouraging it.
Sex, anal sex, is not ALWAYS a part of EVERY marriage is what I was trying to say. More than 1/3rd of gay couples dont even have anal sex. Why is it so hard to understand that some gay people just want companionship and love? It’s not about sex, if it was they wouldn’t feel the need to come out to the world. They could just have gay sex behind closed doors and be straight to the world to prevent from being lashed out on. Are you not capable of thinking from another person’s perspective without passing a judgement? You may learn a thing or two.
If this holier-than-thou and rigid attitude makes you live better, then so be it. I’m not going to bother, I’m w/ @Southie on this one.
There is whole world living in non-white countries.
I would be agree to give a person full right of his body if.
1-very advance disease detection system.
2-Complete quarantine of sick edit But if you want to live with us humans then you better respect what is baseline established.
