Re: Yazid
I have a different take on Yazid, as a completely inadequate ruler and weak person at heart who could not have done what he is attributed to: Something which quite frankly IMO is nothing but a concocted story based on earlier legends of the death of the innocent at the hands of a corrupt ruler: John, Jesus, Mithra etc.
Other than muslim tradition, there is a relatively sparse account of pre-Umayyad era, however, the time from the late 650s onwards seems to be reasonably documented. It is said that Yazid's accession was heavily opposed which begs the question, why. It does not take a rocket scientist to realize that heriditary accession is not the way of a muslim state, and the dominion comes with ability to rule fairly and properly (which by the way goes for the grandson of the Prophet as well).
Considering that the Umayyad rule was at its peak during his father's reign as "commander and elder of the faithful" (Amir-ul-Mu'mineen) Yazid's rise to power, and fall in three years, followed by rise of his son Mu'awiyah II, only to be thwarted down one year later is a definite trend here. The Islamic state is nobody's personal property nor is it a lineage based dominion, especially when ruled by those who are incapable of ruling.
The Root Cause of Lineage Based Rule
It is said that the time following the death of the third Amir of what I call the REAL Knights of the Round Table (Rashiduun Caliphate), is said to have been that of turmoil and uncertainty. The successor, Uthmaan seems to have favoured those of his close family in key administrative positions, which makes sense since he wanted to make sure he could trust the people he worked with. But this may have set the wrong precedent, and started a chain reaction for the worse if you catch my drift.
Accounts of Hun bin AbdurRahmaan from his Diary discovered in Spain (translated from Spanish in 1910)
Sometime between 13 and 26 Safar AH 100:
I am requesting Amir-ul-Momineen (Umar bin Abdul Aziz) to let us establish four army garrisons in Andalusia (Spain) just as Sayyedna Umar Farooq had established two new garrisons in Kufah and Basra. We are here to stay because people in this country love us. They feel liberated. There is total peace in our Emirah (Rule). Jews, Christians, Muslims, all live in harmony and without fear. There is no unrest of any kind, religious or otherwise.
Sometime between 26 Safar AH 100 and 17 Rajab, AH 100:
Just as the plots of the Magians (Zoroastrians) had created trouble in 'Iraq during the first few decades of Islam, similarly we face conspiracies xxx that erupt now and then. The reason is obvious. The local rich elite and the powerful leaders of the past hate social equity between people.
I understand that it is impossible to find people of the caliber of Ali, Hasan and Husain. They, as Emirs (governors), have truly made Iraq a paradise on earth (WHAT???). Ali and Husain (r. a.) sacrificed their lives in their noble offices as Emirs (WHAT???). The Magians had thought that by assassinating these two honorables, Iraq would xxx to the Farisis. But the sacred blood of Emir Ali and Emir Husain was not shed in vain. Ambassadors from the Center (prob. Damascus) and elsewhere report that in Al-Hijrah 100, Kufah, Basra, and xxx are even more peaceful and prosperous than Syria, Palestine and Egypt.
The above accounts are also supported by the works of Abdul Jabbar Qaramati in the Istanbul archives. In my opinion, the traditional accounts of the martyrdom of Hussain are fictional works of the likes of Tabari (who wrote his collection of "History" more than 200 years after the incident).
These three gentlemen (Ali, Hasan and Husain) worked towards establishing peace in the region they administered, with conviction and dedication, and are honourable in every respect. But to elevate them to the levels we have today, including the totally unrealistic accounts of the martyrdom of Husain, is totally uncalled for and crossing the bounds into what the Quran tells us not to do.
So you tell me... how does the story of being killed while serving as governers morph into an epic tale of voilent bloodshed in "the middle of nowhere"? Whether Yazid was involved is even more unlikely since he may have had his own problems at best...