Would he do it, or would he not ?

Hangout GupShup Cafe
1

Suppose I , Code Red is the mentor of suicide bombers. I am ordered from my command and control centre to accomplish a mission. The mission is very critical and should be accomplished without iffs and buts.

I pick two finest trained suicide bombers and all the required logistics and reach the spot. Some how or the other i am able to dodge the security and both of them fully loaded with explosive reach inside the holy places.

One place is The most sacred place form muslims, **Holy Kaba. **They other one is 300 miles away the second most holy place for muslims, Masjid-e-nabwi

Now the question for all you.

Q. Once he (suicide bomber) is ordered to blow himself up inside the most holiest place on earth for muslim (holy Kaba / masjid-e-nabwi), Would he do it or would he not ?

Ans

**1. Yes **
2. No

I request you all to read the question with cool mind and answer it according to your understanding.

Please choose your answer and explain it with reasoning in your own words. thanks. :flower2:

2

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

As far as your Q is no 1 will never think of such act, Allah ke ghar ki hifazat Allah hi karta hai.

No. Never

3

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

...........................

4

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

I agree with DM . But these suicide bombers are heartless , mindless robots . They are so much brainwashed that they can’t even think . I won’t be surprised if he’ll just do it .

Btw we already have an incident in history when a group of people captured kabah , and we also know their end . So I won’t be surprised if they’ll do it again . Freaks :vivo:

5

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

^^ Suicide bombing is not da invention of Muslims, it was started 1st by srilankan tamils, so pointing only muslims for suicide attacks not acceptable.

6

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

^ Read OP and you'll understand the context in which I replied .

Btw if Srilankans were inventors then we are the users .

7

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

^ I apologize i got in wrong context..... yeah u r ryt we r users.

8

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

Since humans are diverse we can't say either yes/no for sure.Depends.Allah ne uskey dil mai daal diya....not to do it..he won't...nai daala..he will..simple as tht.
Sahi Raasta dikhaney wala sirf Allah hai.

9

You know, I never knew this happened until a few years ago when I read up on it…I was so shocked. Now, I wouldn’t be surprised if an incident like the above happened again.

10

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

yes

11

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

looking at how suicide bombers dont refrain to kill people in markets , at darbars , in hospital why would they refrain from killing people in holy places.Sadly these people are great morons who dont care for anyones life

12

suicidal attacks are old tricks, Japanese were the master of that

13

and Muslims did kill muslims in Kaba on July 31st 1987

14

but now a days Muslims are labeled as suicide attackers.I wonder why ?

15

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

you all talk about suicide bombers and nobody mentions drugs? come on people, they're intoxicated, they can do anything you tell them.

btw Code, don't be surprised if they hold you at the airport more than usual. ;)

16

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

I requested member to please answer the question speceficly (yes / no) and state the reason, according to your understanding in your own words. The topic is pricisely mentioned in first post.

The history of suicide bombing is a different topic.

Through this thread i want to understand specific psychology and more importantly the *moudus operan'di *of this specific type of people. Thanks

17

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

Many times in life i have desired nothing more than a glorious death in battle.

Now to say a death in battle... in todays world of brutal modern warfare i am tempted to go out on a bombing spree... very tempted.

But as a dying breed of warriors i do not see the millatary long term effectiveness of suicide bombing, as a tactic it's the limit of desperation. To commit yourself to such can only be justified in my mind if by destroying myself i destroy the enemy completely... Thus in the case of a siege for example or blockade i would glady breach the defenses with my own body.

But in relation to this question i am not a fan of suicadal attacks for a living enemy is more deadly than a dead one.

Thus i would never use this sort of tactic in such a manner.

And as far as shrines, masjids even holy places of other faiths i would not attack with small arms heck i wouldn't dare walk in with a sword so to bomb it is a no no...

Definately answer from me is no.

But sadly some worthless scum feel different.

18

Re: Would he do it, or would he not ?

Codey- they have attacked other places of worship, I dont put it past them that in some "greater scheme of things" or overall mission as they understand it..and I use the term 'understand' very loosely, they would blow up bombs there. the holy sites have been used as bargaining chips/hostages before as well.

19

Even in the late 90s, these suicide bombers were called kamikaze attackers. kamikaze are Japanese version of suicide attackers.

20

Qayamt ke kareeb eik zamana aaye gaa jab naa marnay waley ko pata ho gaa ke woh kyoon maar raha hai and naa marnay waley ko. Anywayz one should never say yes to these kind of acts if they are true muslims and they have little iman left in them, even if its holy place or some common building.