Re: Woman Attacks Man = A Comical Sight?
Just read this. I don’t know how u came to conclusion in ur first sentence. Of course not. I was simply responding to the 40 pct stat in OP. To me that was the story. The gross exaggeration based on a group for “parity”. It never crossed my mind that presenting accurate figures is equivalent to excusing abuse against men.
As for ur other point in other post, u brought up some cases from men may go unreported. Even factoring that the rato currently at 6 -15 could drop maybe to 5-12?
Now please agree with me. I have had a rough couple of weeks here.
Sorry I thought I was replying to Ghost. Above sentence was meant for him.
I came to the conclusion because instead of addressing the question/topic (abuse against men is trivialized), you started spouted stats on why women were the greater victims and ignored the topic at hand. Your post minimized the issue.
You failed to read with comprehension or the thread in its entirety and your post when read in context appears biased.
We trivialize domestic violence by bringing up loose statistics without doing proper research and digging under the hood. ***The first thing that occurred to me was the MAGNITUDE of violence probably was much higher against women in terms of severity of injuries. Little did I realize it was this much higher.
***So maybe this thread served a purpose. Brought to light things are far from “parity”.