The bold part is my point. There’s an element of self policing in all laws and rules of society, and that should apply to women as well as men, as far as antagonizing a larger person and facing the consequences of that goes. The reason **some **women (and I’m not saying it’s all women) test this limit, or disregard it entirely, is because society immediately condemns a man if he ever makes the mistake of hitting a woman. In this instance, the fact that the **woman attacks the man, **still results in assumptions about what the man may have done. And you don’t think our culture is skewed about holding women accountable? That’s my point. Women get protected.
I wouldn’t but since every person in the world isn’t like me, it’s irrelevant. I also wouldn’t rape or steal, but that happens doesn’t it?