Re: With no offense to women
Thanks everyone for the informative posts.
Now coming to the following comment.
Let women decide what they want to do for themselves without interference from any other person, man or woman. Even if you don't agree with what they do it is their choice, not yours. You are not their keeper, they are not your pets.
Hmm....If I apply your logic on your own post, it would become the following:
Let STP decide what he wants to say as his perspective without interference from underthedome. Even if underthedome don't agree with what STP say, it is STP's own choice, not of underthedome. underthedome is not STP's keeper, STP is not underthedome's pet.
^^ But I won't apply your logic on your post. Why ?!?, because I think you have a right to sincerely give your opinion/criticizm on what I say, because it is the duty of every human to encourage what he thinks is morally right and discourage what he thinks is morally wrong.
Also your logic automatically applies on you when you say:
Let women decide what they want to do for themselves without interference from any other person, man or woman. Even if you don't agree with what they do it is their choice, not yours. You are not their keeper, they are not your pets.
^ So yes, according to your logic (which applies also on you),** let them decide themselves if my first post is right or wrong "for them". You are not their keeper, they are not your pets**
Makes sense ?:)
And ofcourse I was just giving my opinion which might be wrong. You would be "Certainly" right to say "You are not their keeper, they are not your pets" **ONLY** when I am physically forcing them or mentally controlling them to go against their will, which I am not. And they can happily ignore and criticize my posts, if they don't agree with me. I am just giving my views. SO, your "this" point is unreasonable.