‘With Maharashtra For Maharashtrians ...Where is India For Indians?’

Looks like Maharashtrians are rejecting the Hindi domination. They do not want Hindi to be part of Maharashtra assembly.


NEW DELHI - Reacting to Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray’s criticism of Sachin Tendulkar, Minister of State for External Affairs Shashi Tharoor on Nov 16 said “with Maharashtra for Maharashtrians and Kashmir for Kashmiris, where is India for Indians?”

Tharoor’s posting on social networking site ‘twitter.com’ read: “on Sachin & Sena, my late dad Chandran Tharoor said in 66 — with Maharashtra 4(for) Maharashtrians & Kashmir 4(for) Kashmiris, where is India for Indians?”.

Thackeray had accused Tendulkar of hurting Marathi sentiments with his “Mumbai for all” remarks.

In an interaction with the media on completing 20 years in international cricket, Tendulkar had said, “I am a Maharashtrian and I am extremely proud of that. But I am an Indian first. And Mumbai belongs to all Indians.”

Thackeray, in the party Marathi mouthpiece ‘Saamna’, said that Tendulkar, through his remark, had “left the crease and moved to the pitch of politics and this had hurt the Marathi psyche”.

India Journal - South Asian News for Southern California

Re: ‘With Maharashtra For Maharashtrians ...Where is India For Indians?’

Well as i said before
biggest threat for India are the extreme fundamentalist Hindus.

They will be reponsible for India's disintegration.

Re: ‘With Maharashtra For Maharashtrians ...Where is India For Indians?’

It is very essential to understand the local politics before such comments are made.
BT is in his last stage of his political career and is doing everything to remain relevant. These parties have lost election after election and is trying to create a ruckus so that they can garner some votes. This strategy would have worked in the past, but will not work now...

Re: ‘With Maharashtra For Maharashtrians ...Where is India For Indians?’

in 50s it was tamil problem, in 70s it was eastern india problem, in 80s it was sikh problem....and our democracy is competent to resolve such issues....

I am sure you do, just kill the entire villages and problem will be resolved.

Although i agree that this Thackrey is just an idiot who manages to fool some jaahil Maharashtran people otherwise not many people care about him outside Maharashtra but we all know what "Indian democracy" is all about.

This policy was tried by someone in the region .... and they had to lose that part !!!!

It is important that all voice a be heard in a democracy and dealt with in a democratic way .... it doesn't matter how absurd the voice is !!!!

lecture on democracy by a pak citizen....bravo!

India is a democracy! WoW!!!!

Yes and listen to your own leaders at least :smiley:

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan

No terror in India due to democracy, says Nawaz
Daily Times Monitor

LAHORE: Terrorism cannot prevail in India because of the strong democracy in that country, a private TV channel quoted former premier Nawaz Sharif as saying on Monday.

The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz chief said the democratic regimes in India had barred terrorism from the country. Nawaz said terrorism flourished in dictatorial regimes. To eradicate terrorism, he said, the door should be slammed shut on martial law forever.

He said the National Reconciliation Ordinance was still before the court and added that President Asif Zardari enjoyed immunity under the constitution and the courts would take note of that.

I am sure shri maoist live on mars not in India… Gaja also say lot of other things… :rotfl:

P.S: BTW they also says in democracy ppl don’t die of starvations LOL…

Where is lecture??
I just said "we all know what "Indian democracy" is all about" :D

Don't worry there is still a hope, you haven't fully lost Assam as yet :D:D

BTW your civilized Shiv Sainks are doing pretty well aren't they???Attacking offices, degrading your top crickters, i am sure you are as cvilized as your Shiv Sainaks :P

Keep dreaming for all you might. Assam will remain a part of India ...

Chetan Bhagat says - Inter-regiona, Inter Castel and religious marriages are the best way to bring national integration

Most publications and channels are only interested in covering high-class issues rather than the stories of the people of Mumbai, thus relegating a perfectly fine Marathi culture to a lower-class status. Ours is probably the only country where local cultures are looked down upon. Anything too Indian, or liked by too many Indians, is considered down-market. This, despite Marathi culture being one of the richest, original cultures in India, followed by a majority of Maharashtrians. In such a scenario, any party offering visibility to an ignored but loved culture is bound to get support. For the record, the MNS has organised Marathi poetry recitations and literature exhibitions.

However, despite the above valid causes and potentially good intentions, MNS may not be the best bet for Marathis. MNS has gained maximum publicity when it does something dramatic and violent. While such acts attract attention, it is a slippery slope. To get noticed next time, you have to keep increasing the intensity and do something with higher shock value. Members of the MNS have reached the point of slapping an elected representative in the state assembly. But even that story died soon. Soon they’ll increase the heat further, hurt innocent people, and cross the limits of civilised behaviour. Is that Marathi culture?

MNS may have brought forward the Marathi cause but by going against almost everyone non-Marathi, it has demonstrated how little it understands the state’s dependence on the central government. Maharashtra needs central support to complete critical irrigation projects, which will cost thousands of crores of rupees. Our best shot at progress as a nation is if all states work together with a common agenda, instead of pulling in different directions. Also, by indulging in violent fights with other political parties, the MNS displays an unwillingness to get along with other interest groups. Such an attitude is impractical in a country like India. If MNS members can’t listen to people, who will listen to them?

By claiming Mumbai for Marathis and calling everyone else an outsider, MNS is only harming Marathis in the long term. In today’s world, progress depends on inter-dependence. If global agricultural companies are incentivised and welcomed to base themselves in Maharashtra, it can dramatically alter the standard of living for Marathi farmers. Kicking everyone else out won’t. A lack of understanding of the modern world also casts doubt over MNS’s ability to actually deliver on the issues it has raised.

Most Marathis still do not vote MNS. It is these people who can help most by talking more about the choices available to their community and the pros and cons of each option. Increasing the decibel levels of the moderate Marathi voice is needed now. In that respect, the recent comments by Sachin Tendulkar are commendable. Non-Marathis have to stop painting individual personalities as villains and spend more time thinking about what is truly driving the support base of a divisive person. If you dig deep, you will find that just like you, all that the MNS supporters are looking for is a better life. And that common desire alone is enough reason for us to be one.

*The writer is a best-selling novelist. *

To Maharashtra, With Love - Edit Page - Opinion - Home - The Times of India

and who are this we....if not citizens of pak...do you have any idea..what democracy is...

we indians today do not know who is ruling in pakistan...said the indian pm.

Re: ‘With Maharashtra For Maharashtrians ...Where is India For Indians?’

The common expectation from MG and others is that India should be a perfect democracy or else it is no good. No democracy is or ever was perfect. Democracies by the very definition cannot be perfect, particularly in a country as big as India and containing as many diverse ethnic, linugistic and religious groups.

I would like to say that MG and others who criticise India sans arrêt, do so out of a misunderstanding of democracy's nature, but that alas would not be true. Pakistan has failed totally as a democracy and this criticism of India as an imperfect democracy comes from jealousy, pure and simple.

Re: ‘With Maharashtra For Maharashtrians ...Where is India For Indians?’

I don't know why such a big thinng is being made of this. This whole idea that I am an Indian/Pakistani/Canadian first then Marathi/Quebecois/Lahori second is meaningless. If you are a Pakistani from Lahore, does it ever happen that Lahore goes to war with the rest of the Pakistan and you have to take one side or other? This is just rhetoric and everybody should ignore it. Just taliya pitao or bhool jao. And while we are at it, why does Thackeray never criticise Dawood Ibrahim? Beacause he is a Maharashtrian?