im sorry, i think its you who doesnt know basic history, i offer you the oppinion of a noted historian, and you regurgitate propaganda and pass it off as doctrinal truth.
please present your evidence. Wikipedia is not a valid source, the presence of ruins is not evidence, history books by the RSS are not valid sources either…
You make the broad assumpltion that ALL Muslim rulers must have been identical in disposition and motivation. You ignore complexity, for the solace of simplicity. Your mindset is typical of someone who is to lazy to do some actual research. I know hisotry doesnt always conform to how we want to perceive things, but that’s how it is, love it or leave it.