Re: Why …
Let me say it more clearly.
He was NOT an elected president and did not bring the will and wishes of Public.
He brought something like Majlis e Shoora of his own choice and implemented laws of his liking.
Public was not the part of his actions.
His actions are irrelevant when one talks about future of Pakistan.
As to what happened afterward, everyone knows repeatedly the NA has been dissolved and more importantly another dictator ruled over the country for years.
Good thing that 18th amendment to constitution was passed to remove earlier misuse of power by the President. Zardari signed that I think.
But the fact is that repeatedly the wishes of public had been ignored.
Now if the majority of NA passed Nizam e Adal, so why criticize?
Isn’t that democracy all about?
President signs Nizam-e-Adl Regulation: Presidency - GEO.tv
Also, see this video.
I do not think the data shown in video altogether statistically valid but** what I am saying majority of Pakistani awam still accepts Islam being a part of Govt. and laws…**
…just like when Zia did the referandum and fooled people by adding the question on the ballot about Islami Nizam and him being accepted as the Ameerul Momineen.
People thought he would be sincere and a lot of people voted yes.
Again you keep dragging me in to system change discussion and I need you to talk about surgical and precise dissection and removal of problems regardless of the system.
So no more discussion on the system change at this time.